200:
415:
While the Who's Who mentioned above can be considered a reliable source in some cases, which is not the case for the other Who's Who, just being mentioned in a reliable source does not give notability. The actual guidelines calls for
298:
not notable in his own right. He is a courtesy marquess but there is no certainty that he will become Duke of
Beaufort. We should cross that bridge when we come to it. For now he is not notable in his own right and doesn't pass
194:
395:
134:
129:
138:
121:
161:
338:
321:
108:
93:
420:, mentions in reliable sources that are significant. The mention of this person in Who's Who does not really meet the significant coverage requirement.
215:
182:
429:
404:
384:
370:
347:
330:
312:
290:
240:
63:
176:
172:
261:, which is depreciated. Regardless I was hovering around weak keep until I saw the following snippet of information in the article
125:
222:
88:
81:
17:
250:
117:
69:
188:
102:
98:
446:
425:
40:
380:
236:
442:
274:
36:
421:
366:
258:
208:
58:
376:
286:
232:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
308:
262:
362:
399:
342:
325:
268:
359:
300:
254:
53:
282:
155:
304:
273:". This confirms to me that this is a non-notable position. Now,
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
281:
he will likely have the established notability for an article.
251:
previous attempt to establish notability criteria for nobility
257:. The only major source that is not a passing mention is the
231:
I don't think peerage is among
Knowledge notability criteria
396:
list of
Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions
151:
147:
143:
207:
360:
https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U17226
275:
if this guy eventually becomes the Duke of
Beaufort
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
394:Note: This discussion has been included in the
337:Note: This discussion has been included in the
320:Note: This discussion has been included in the
303:. For now just noteworthy for who his father is
267:"The title Marquess of Worcester is used as a
221:
8:
339:list of England-related deletion discussions
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
358:Notable as he has an entry in UK Who's Who
322:list of People-related deletion discussions
393:
336:
319:
118:Robert Somerset, Marquess of Worcester
70:Robert Somerset, Marquess of Worcester
7:
375:Not among our notability criteria.
249:: I was initially torn on this. A
24:
271:by the duke's eldest son and heir
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
253:failed, so we have to go by
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
466:
430:19:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
405:12:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
385:19:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
371:18:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
348:18:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
331:18:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
313:10:54, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
291:03:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
241:02:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
439:Please do not modify it.
64:08:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
422:John Pack Lambert
407:
350:
333:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
457:
402:
345:
328:
263:Duke of Beaufort
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
61:
56:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
400:
343:
326:
168:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
433:
432:
409:
408:
390:
389:
388:
387:
352:
351:
334:
316:
315:
293:
269:courtesy title
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
411:
410:
406:
403:
397:
392:
391:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
361:
357:
354:
353:
349:
346:
340:
335:
332:
329:
323:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
270:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
438:
436:
417:
412:
377:Lembit Staan
355:
295:
278:
266:
246:
233:Lembit Staan
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
195:free images
363:Piecesofuk
259:Daily Mail
443:talk page
401:Spiderone
344:Spiderone
327:Spiderone
37:talk page
445:or in a
418:multiple
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
283:Curbon7
201:WP refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
413:Delete
305:Uhooep
301:WP:GNG
296:Delete
255:WP:GNG
247:Delete
173:Google
139:delete
60:plicit
50:delete
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
426:talk
381:talk
367:talk
356:Keep
309:talk
287:talk
279:then
237:talk
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
223:TWL
160:– (
428:)
398:.
383:)
369:)
341:.
324:.
311:)
289:)
277:,
265::
239:)
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
424:(
379:(
365:(
307:(
285:(
235:(
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.