487:
My institute studies different
Chinese romanization systems including Nankinese. The input software based on this romanization is published on GIT, which proves it exists. And GIT shows it is based on a published dictionary. On zh.wiki there is another romanization of Nankinese. This article should
438:
FYI, all three pages are created by the same editor, and the
Chinese Knowledge page includes extra information about a second (first?) pre-modern romanization used in a 1902 publication (which is itself the additional reference).
198:
593:
This is not a sufficient reason for deleting. A lot of articles show no usable source in
English, but show in other language. This article describes a romanization of a language, which has already received attention from
257:) that appears to be crowdsourced, with no visible "About us" page apart from a Weibo page (and hence I believe it is fully plausible that 柳漫 themselves is responsible for usage of this romanization on the website).
325:
The input software base on
Nankinese Pinyin is on GIT. It is downloaded and uesed by thousands of people in the world. A software or project on GIT is convincing enough for wiki. This is the reason why there is
233:
The primary one is the Github-hosted outline of the romanization created by the WP page-creator+probable romanization-creator (else why is this one of 2 references and the only one describing the romanization?
192:
159:
282:
132:
127:
302:
136:
415:
are essential the same as the
English, the lan 2 article has a single additional reference that is not enough to make this article subject pass notability
106:
119:
91:
373:
671:
213:
180:
704:. This means the romanization of Nankinese has got attention from academy since more than 100 years. Why should it be deleted? --
86:
79:
17:
174:
713:
691:
638:
624:
603:
588:
569:
541:
519:
501:
477:
448:
426:
393:
359:
314:
294:
274:
61:
347:
239:
170:
100:
96:
579:, there are no usable sources to be found in English and no one has pointed out usable sources in other languages. –
412:
253:
The second reference is an online pronunciation dictionary presented as an example of adoption of this romanization (
52:. The best arguments in this debate, as supported by policy and guidelines, fell on the 'delete' side of the debate.
532:
I agree with Phil
Bridger, whether you are a supporter of any group is irrelevant. But your phantasy is really ...--
123:
554:
473:
459:
732:
343:
220:
40:
377:
335:
115:
67:
368:
is not a reliable source for
Knowledge purposes. Anyone can create an entry there. And whether the article
389:
728:
709:
469:
355:
36:
186:
620:
616:
585:
527:
515:
511:
444:
440:
381:
331:
310:
306:
290:
286:
270:
266:
262:
629:
As I wrote above, my institute studies different
Chinese romanization systems including Nankinese.--
364:
I have as yet no opinion on whether this article should be deleted or not, but must point out that
206:
701:
243:
376:, is completely irrelevant to the article under consideration here. I am not a supporter of the
634:
599:
537:
507:
497:
421:
385:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
727:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
682:), but it seems to be a book about the Nanking topolect, not about this romanization system.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
705:
687:
655:
351:
235:
57:
488:
be extended instead of deleting. The references on zh.wiki show sufficient sources to pass
581:
667:
697:
679:
489:
404:
247:
240:
https://github.com/uliloewi/lang2jin1/commit/2fdc822739d4dca0f00291a79646671669c94263
659:
630:
610:
595:
533:
493:
433:
416:
153:
683:
663:
565:
53:
408:
339:
407:
I did a search and did not find anything. The two other language articles
369:
365:
327:
506:(No one else has mentioned it, so I will: strong suspicions of a
723:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
338:, whose policy is wiping out all languages and dialects except
557:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
462:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
615:
Can you elaborate (what "academy"?) and provide evidence?
254:
334:
is active on
Chinese wiki. He seems to be a supporter of
149:
145:
141:
205:
563:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
468:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
735:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
281:Note: This discussion has been included in the
283:list of Language-related deletion discussions
219:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
303:list of China-related deletion discussions
300:
280:
403:The existing refrences do NOT support
372:should exist, after being deleted in
7:
670:and only two primary sources cited.
674:cites one additional source (which
342:in the territory. See the case of
24:
658:is not sufficient for inclusion.
700:show it is a doctoral thesis in
696:The 1st page and the preface of
678:in English, and is available on
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
384:is or not is also irrelevant.
1:
714:18:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
692:08:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
639:09:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
625:09:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
604:07:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
589:12:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
570:10:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
542:09:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
520:09:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
502:10:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
478:08:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
449:05:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
427:18:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
261:There is also no evidence of
394:21:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
360:08:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
315:23:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
295:23:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
275:23:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
662:are necessary to establish
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
752:
666:. At present there are no
229:Has only two references.
116:Romanization of Nankinese
68:Romanization of Nankinese
62:12:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
725:Please do not modify it.
378:Communist Party of China
32:Please do not modify it.
255:http://cn.voicedic.com/
80:Articles for deletion
702:Leipzig University
668:secondary sources
572:
480:
425:
317:
297:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
743:
660:Reliable sources
614:
562:
560:
558:
531:
470:Vaticidalprophet
467:
465:
463:
437:
419:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
751:
750:
746:
745:
744:
742:
741:
740:
739:
733:deletion review
698:Nanking Kuanhua
608:
573:
553:
551:
525:
481:
458:
456:
431:
382:User:Suzukaze-c
374:this discussion
332:User:Suzukaze-c
242:). Hence it is
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
749:
747:
738:
737:
719:
718:
717:
716:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
561:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
466:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
397:
396:
380:, but whether
362:
348:Inner Mongolia
319:
318:
298:
259:
258:
251:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
748:
736:
734:
730:
726:
721:
720:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
650:
649:
640:
636:
632:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
612:
607:
606:
605:
601:
597:
592:
591:
590:
587:
584:
583:
578:
575:
574:
571:
568:
567:
559:
556:
543:
539:
535:
529:
524:
523:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
491:
486:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
464:
461:
450:
446:
442:
435:
430:
429:
428:
423:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
299:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:WP:NOTABILITY
256:
252:
249:
246:research and
245:
241:
237:
232:
231:
230:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
722:
675:
651:
580:
576:
564:
552:
484:
457:
400:
386:Phil Bridger
322:
260:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
680:archive.org
672:zh:南京話拉丁化方案
244:WP:ORIGINAL
193:free images
664:notability
617:Suzukaze-c
594:academy.--
528:Suzukaze-c
512:Suzukaze-c
508:WP:BADSOCK
441:Suzukaze-c
307:Suzukaze-c
287:Suzukaze-c
267:Suzukaze-c
238:, and see
729:talk page
654:. Merely
340:Putonghua
330:on wiki.
37:talk page
731:or in a
656:existing
582:Thjarkur
555:Relisted
460:Relisted
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
631:NeujorK
611:NeujorK
596:NeujorK
534:NeujorK
494:NeujorK
434:Jeepday
417:Jeepday
236:User:柳漫
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
684:Cnilep
652:Delete
586:(talk)
577:Delete
566:Bungle
490:WP:GNG
411:&
405:WP:GNG
401:Delete
370:Vue.js
366:Github
328:Vue.js
248:WP:COI
171:Google
137:delete
54:Daniel
50:delete
413:lan 2
409:lan 1
344:Tibet
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
710:talk
688:talk
635:talk
621:talk
600:talk
538:talk
516:talk
498:talk
485:Keep
474:talk
445:talk
422:talk
390:talk
356:talk
346:and
323:Keep
311:talk
291:talk
271:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
492:.--
336:CPC
221:TWL
158:– (
712:)
706:柳漫
690:)
676:is
637:)
623:)
602:)
540:)
522:)
518:)
510:.
500:)
476:)
447:)
392:)
358:)
352:柳漫
350:--
313:)
305:.
293:)
285:.
273:)
265:.
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
708:(
686:(
633:(
619:(
613::
609:@
598:(
536:(
530::
526:@
514:(
496:(
472:(
443:(
436::
432:@
424:)
420:(
388:(
354:(
309:(
289:(
269:(
250:.
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.