276:
I acknowledge what you're saying, but I'm not changing my !vote. We had 'List of minor characters from The
Simpsons' recently. We need to achieve some kind of consensus. I don't believe that 'subject of multiple non-trivial media reports' is really the standard (although, by the way, I believe that
303:
A relatively subsidiary charactery in a major complicated series can have an important role in the continuity, and clarity for the readers may be greatly helped by presenting the character in a separate article. However, this article is written in such a over-detailed way it doesn't really
261:
I don't see your logic. Minor characters are minor characters regardless of the longevity of the show they're from. And I'd also vehemently disagree with the claim that articles like this make
Knowledge great; I'd argue quite the opposite.
281:
satisfy that standard, if you were to look over the last 52 years' worth of electronic and print media in the US). The fact that a TV show is widely published can ipso facto give its content notability. -
247:
has run for 13 thousand episodes and 52 years. A minor character from this show is more notable than a minor character from an ordinary show. Article like this are what make wikipedia great. -
176:
304:
accomplish much in the way or clarity. If it's rewritten, it might be keepable. (I assume for the sake of argument that it is possible to accomplish a clear concise account of the story.)
132:
202:
72:
323:. This is just what Knowledge doesn't need: yet another long, rambling, unreferenced wall-of-text plot summary. There is no assertion or demonstration of
99:
94:
103:
86:
17:
148:
391:
36:
390:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
376:
359:
342:
315:
291:
287:
271:
256:
252:
235:
217:
191:
166:
56:
90:
372:
144:
82:
62:
283:
248:
213:
187:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
267:
231:
162:
355:
368:
335:
140:
311:
209:
183:
50:
120:
324:
263:
227:
158:
351:
328:
306:
384:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
327:
in the real world, or even within the limits of the soap opera.
157:--unremarkable, despite the million words in that article.
177:
list of
Fictional characters-related deletion discussions
127:
116:
112:
108:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
394:). No further edits should be made to this page.
203:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
201:: This debate has been included in the
175:: This debate has been included in the
70:
367:per nom lacks real world notability.
226:absolutely irrelevant to the non-fan.
7:
73:Articles for deletion/Rose D'Angelo
69:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
139:Unremarkable fictional person
1:
377:06:57, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
360:22:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
343:21:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
316:20:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
292:08:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
272:07:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
257:07:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
236:06:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
218:06:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
192:06:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
167:05:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
149:04:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
57:04:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
411:
387:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
350:doesn't meet the GNG.
68:AfDs for this article:
277:this minor character
61:
245:As the World Turns
44:The result was
220:
206:
194:
180:
402:
389:
333:
207:
197:
181:
171:
130:
124:
106:
53:
34:
410:
409:
405:
404:
403:
401:
400:
399:
398:
392:deletion review
385:
339:
329:
126:
97:
81:
78:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
408:
406:
397:
396:
380:
379:
362:
345:
337:
318:
301:Very weak Keep
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
284:Richard Cavell
249:Richard Cavell
238:
221:
195:
169:
137:
136:
77:
76:
75:
67:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
407:
395:
393:
388:
382:
381:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:
344:
341:
340:
334:
332:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
308:
302:
299:
293:
289:
285:
280:
275:
274:
273:
269:
265:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
204:
200:
196:
193:
189:
185:
178:
174:
170:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:Rose D'Angelo
80:
79:
74:
71:
64:
63:Rose D'Angelo
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
386:
383:
364:
347:
336:
330:
320:
305:
300:
278:
244:
240:
223:
198:
172:
154:
141:John Collier
138:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
325:notability
369:JBsupreme
210:• Gene93k
184:• Gene93k
133:View log
100:protect
95:history
52:MBisanz
365:Delete
348:Delete
321:Delete
264:JuJube
228:JuJube
224:Delete
159:Drmies
155:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
46:delete
352:RMHED
279:would
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
373:talk
356:talk
331:Reyk
312:talk
288:talk
268:talk
253:talk
241:Keep
232:talk
214:talk
199:Note
188:talk
173:Note
163:talk
145:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
338:YO!
307:DGG
208:--
205:.
182:--
179:.
375:)
358:)
314:)
290:)
270:)
255:)
243:-
234:)
216:)
190:)
165:)
147:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
48:.
371:(
354:(
310:(
286:(
266:(
251:(
230:(
212:(
186:(
161:(
143:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.