608:: Sometimes "a presumption of notability" gets confused with automatic and the bar is set higher on BLP's. In the case of a state Supreme Court judge of India (there are 1076) with a population of over 1.3 billion people there is certainly a presumption. Rajasthan has over 68.5 million people and 50 high court judges. When backed by sources there is notability. In this case there are sources and some were
280:
states (modified for brevity) that "Judges who have held sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office are presumed to be notable". Yes, it does say that "meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included", but I would be very surprised if there was not sufficient secondary
281:
sources to establish notability, even if only in Hindu, and as such I don't believe we should delete this article until a Hindu-speaking editor who can confirm that there is nothing to back up a claim of notability beyond his high position. --
412:: I have added a couple of references and text concerning the subject's National Green Tribunal role. Aside from the incident noted above, a Google India news search shows significant coverage of recent decisions led by the subject:
212:
304:
I had assumed that finding sources would be hard, but I should have searched immediately. While most of the articles revealed mention him in passing, there are others that discuss him in more detail, such as this horrific
312:, it doesn't appear to be a tabloid either, so it is possible it is true and thus reinforces the notability of the concerned individual, and hints towards additional references on non-English platforms. --
206:
165:
363:. But yes, Hindi would probably have been more correct. As for the references; in that case, perhaps you can search for them, and if you can't find any note that to us? --
436:, SIGCOV? Any judge across any court (unless at the lowest tier) will get such routine mentions. Which source has covered his activities/ judicial performance in detail?
138:
133:
390:
142:
112:
585:
125:
97:
172:
462:
The minimum requirement for appointment as judicial member in the subject's current role is to have served as a high court judge (see 5(1) on p4 of
306:
478:
would not thereby be met? That the decisions of tribunals over which he has presided are being reported in the media provides supplementary
227:
194:
514:
447:
349:
265:
413:
92:
85:
17:
129:
188:
642:
621:
597:
576:
549:
516:
495:
449:
428:
401:
377:
351:
326:
295:
267:
67:
504:
437:
339:
255:
184:
106:
102:
558:
531:
661:
234:
121:
73:
40:
593:
572:
657:
36:
200:
545:
467:
360:
220:
463:
589:
568:
476:"judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office"
394:
374:
323:
292:
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
656:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
617:
251:
62:
638:
541:
491:
483:
471:
424:
416:
277:
243:
We assume auto-notability for
Supreme Court judges or Chief Justices of High Courts.
609:
247:
364:
335:
313:
282:
159:
630:
613:
479:
53:
634:
500:
487:
433:
420:
338:, what the heck is Hindu? There is a language called Hindi and I speak that.
309:
482:
of the subject's active role, but my keep opinion is centred on the
650:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
561:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
534:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
155:
151:
147:
219:
567:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
540:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
466:), which the subject satisfies through his 2007-15
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
664:). No further edits should be made to this page.
584:Note: This discussion has been included in the
389:Note: This discussion has been included in the
233:
8:
113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
583:
391:list of India-related deletion discussions
388:
586:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
474:presumed notability criterion for
24:
503:, the usual SNG/GNG debate......
98:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
470:role. I see no reason why our
1:
643:09:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
622:13:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
68:19:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
598:07:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
577:21:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
550:19:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
517:12:40, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
496:11:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
450:11:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
429:10:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
402:10:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
378:11:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
352:11:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
327:10:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
296:10:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
268:08:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
88:(AfD)? Read these primers!
681:
122:Raghuvendra Singh Rathore
74:Raghuvendra Singh Rathore
653:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
415:. Overall, enough for
86:Articles for deletion
468:Rajasthan High Court
361:Hindustani language
600:
579:
552:
404:
103:Guide to deletion
93:How to contribute
672:
655:
566:
564:
562:
539:
537:
535:
512:
507:
445:
440:
399:
371:
368:
347:
342:
320:
317:
289:
286:
263:
258:
238:
237:
223:
175:
163:
145:
83:
60:
34:
680:
679:
675:
674:
673:
671:
670:
669:
668:
662:deletion review
651:
580:
557:
555:
553:
530:
528:
508:
505:
441:
438:
395:
369:
366:
343:
340:
318:
315:
287:
284:
259:
256:
180:
171:
136:
120:
117:
80:
77:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
678:
676:
667:
666:
646:
645:
624:
602:
601:
565:
554:
538:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
455:
454:
453:
452:
406:
405:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
355:
354:
330:
329:
299:
298:
241:
240:
177:
116:
115:
110:
100:
95:
78:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
677:
665:
663:
659:
654:
648:
647:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
590:Coolabahapple
587:
582:
581:
578:
574:
570:
563:
560:
551:
547:
543:
536:
533:
518:
515:
513:
511:
502:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
451:
448:
446:
444:
435:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
419:criterion 1.
418:
414:
411:
408:
407:
403:
400:
398:
392:
387:
379:
376:
373:
372:
362:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
350:
348:
346:
337:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
322:
321:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
297:
294:
291:
290:
279:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
264:
262:
253:
249:
244:
236:
232:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
186:
183:
182:Find sources:
178:
174:
170:
167:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
114:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
82:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
65:
61:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
652:
649:
626:
605:
569:Jovanmilic97
556:
529:
509:
480:verification
475:
464:the 2010 Act
442:
409:
397:CAPTAIN RAJU
396:
365:
344:
314:
283:
273:
260:
245:
242:
230:
224:
216:
209:
203:
197:
191:
181:
168:
79:
63:
56:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
486:criterion.
308:Looking up
207:free images
542:Randykitty
658:talk page
305:incident.
252:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
660:or in a
559:Relisted
532:Relisted
484:WP:JUDGE
472:WP:JUDGE
417:WP:JUDGE
310:Zee News
278:WP:JUDGE
166:View log
107:glossary
39:or in a
336:NoCOBOL
250:and/or
213:WP refs
201:scholar
139:protect
134:history
84:New to
631:Otr500
629:, per
614:Otr500
375:(talk)
324:(talk)
293:(talk)
248:WP:GNG
246:Fails
185:Google
143:delete
57:bd2412
635:Julle
610:added
501:AllyD
488:AllyD
434:AllyD
421:AllyD
370:COBOL
319:COBOL
288:COBOL
228:JSTOR
189:books
173:Stats
160:views
152:watch
148:links
16:<
639:talk
627:Keep
618:talk
606:Keep
594:talk
573:talk
546:talk
492:talk
425:talk
410:Keep
274:Keep
221:FENS
195:news
156:logs
130:talk
126:edit
50:keep
633:. /
510:WBG
443:WBG
345:WBG
261:WBG
235:TWL
164:– (
641:)
620:)
612:.
596:)
588:.
575:)
548:)
494:)
427:)
393:.
367:No
316:No
285:No
276:.
254:.
215:)
158:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
52:.
637:(
616:(
592:(
571:(
544:(
506:∯
490:(
439:∯
423:(
341:∯
257:∯
239:)
231:·
225:·
217:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
187:(
179:(
176:)
169:·
162:)
124:(
109:)
105:(
64:T
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.