542:
non-commercial organization. And I don't think it should run it's course, simply because it is by the same person (the aus.rail "Nomen Nescio/George Orwell/Anonymous Sender" character) who has made the last 5 nominations, and that any
Railpage article AfD made by him is tainted, and should be nipped in the bud, pronto. If you wish a *proper* AfD, then wait a respectable period of time (say a month or two), and nominate it yourself.
379:
Oops, sorry. I wasn't aware of the prior AfD history, when I made that suggestion. I only saw a speedy nomination that didn't seem to meet the criteria, and figured a prod would be contested in a matter of minutes, so declined and suggested AfD as the standard forum of appeal. No particular opinion,
65:
spam. This article has been the subject of an on going edit war 4 AfD nominations and at least 6 CSD tags inside 10 days. It has also been subject to 4 other AFD nominations prior to this round of edit warring. Its also difficult to AGF the nomination by an editor new to this page today (11 Aug).
332:
Though most of the previous AfDs were closed early as bad faith nominations, making the number of discussions a bit misleading, this nomination has been made by yet another single-purpose account. If it is so pertinent that an administrator recommended taking this to AfD, then that admin is more
541:
You can certainly argue for a weak delete, as you did in your first sentence. It's just that arguing over content (as you did in your second half) has no real bearing on the debate. The
Railpage article is not going to be deleted over whether or not Railpage Australia is a commercial or
262:" Each time you nominate the article for a spurious AfD, you lose more and more credibility, and the chance of the article actually being deleted becomes less and less. You are turning the Fundie Railpage Kiddies into a bunch of people who are being picked on by a bully.
516:
Tezza, an AfD is not the place for a content dispute ("Commercial or non-commercial?"). If you include discussions like that here, you may very well cause the debate to be closed. There is one place for that debate,and that is in the
Railpage Talk
351:- single-issue SPA account undermines the credibility of the nomination. All previous nominations have been seriously compromised by SPA's and votestacking; yet, they have all been closed as keep. Multiple sources on the page demonstrate
494:, is technically a "voluntary payment for service". There is no transparent disclosure process where the donated money actually goes, and any "donations" would be classified as income generated by Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd
136:
474:
This nomination should be let to run its course. I suspect in the second nomination for deletion there was voting fraud. The later part of the current article is borderline advertising (Digital River) see hosting services
130:
125:
100:
427:- If there were a non-bad faith nomination by a non-SPA, then there's probably room for a discussion since it has actually been a while since a valid AfD. However that is not the case as it stand.
120:
115:
110:
105:
95:
279:
557:
Whatever the original nominators intentions (i suspect his/her intentions could be the opposite to what people immediately think) I still think this nomination should be run till end,
192:
90:
443:
255:
318:
I'd just like to note that not only is this IP address an SPA, but it recently edit-warring by invalidly adding a speedy deletion page to this page. --
415:- 1st Afd (May 06) withdrew on Stub page. 2nd Afd (Feb 07) Keep. 3rd Afd (July 07) closed as content dispute. 4th - 7th Afd closed as bad faith nom.
199:
Despite weeks to change the text no attempt has been made to clean up the advertising. This is being taken to AFD as recommended by Luna Santin.
165:
160:
482:
If weak deleted there should be some mention in the article that
Railpage is a commercial venture. Railpage seems intertwined with its owner
340:
169:
495:
303:
152:
561:
546:
536:
521:
508:
464:
452:
431:
419:
407:
395:
371:
359:
343:
322:
311:
286:
270:
249:
233:
221:
203:
73:
17:
58:
229:- Bad faith nom by a single purpose account. The article may have problems, but abuse of process isn't the way to solve them. --
497:
and subject to tax. I have even tried to compromise, stating "Commercial - Yes, Free membership, Voluntary payment for service"
266:, and permanently block the nominator, and the next sockpuppet he uses, and the one after that, and the one after that, etc.
578:
36:
337:
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
156:
307:
390:
368:
148:
79:
52:
532:
Okay, so I can't argue for a weak delete? I still think the current nomination should run it's course.
334:
246:
200:
70:
500:. If a weak delete is supported the box in the top right hand corner should be edited as follows.
217:
404:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
352:
382:
230:
48:
62:
367:
And please stop wasting our time. It seems this page is up for deletion every few days.
67:
485:. I have asked other users to provide evidence for Railpage "non commercial status"
213:
186:
558:
543:
533:
518:
505:
461:
449:
283:
267:
492:
483:
356:
319:
491:
Asking for "donations" by a commercial organization like
Railpage Australia
478:
and a vanity write up with no proper referencing of individuals involved.
428:
416:
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
280:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_checkuser/Case/The_Null_Devicefor
137:
Articles for deletion/Railpage
Australia (second nomination)
131:
Articles for deletion/Railpage
Australia (9th nomination)
126:
Articles for deletion/Railpage
Australia (8th nomination)
101:
Articles for deletion/Railpage
Australia (3rd nomination)
476:
501:
498:
486:
282:
more sockpuppets that this editor has used in the past.
182:
178:
174:
212:- this is actually the eighth AFD for this article.
333:than welcome to nominate the article for deletion.
256:
Knowledge (XXG):Assume_the_assumption_of_good_faith
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:The first rule of WP:AGF: Don't talk about WP:AGF.
61:) suggestion was in response to the article being
581:). No further edits should be made to this page.
355:. We do not need to go through this again. --
8:
121:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (7)
116:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (6)
111:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (5)
106:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (4)
96:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia (2)
460:Oh please, this is getting ridiculous! --
442:: This debate has been included in the
91:Articles for deletion/Railpage Australia
88:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
444:list of Australia-related deletions
241:and you MUST assume good faith. An
86:
24:
245:recommended taking this to AFD.
488:. To this date they have not.
278:. Refer to the bottom part of
1:
562:09:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
547:09:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
537:09:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
522:08:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
509:08:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
465:08:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
453:08:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
432:08:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
420:08:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
408:08:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
396:07:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
372:07:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
360:07:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
344:07:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
323:07:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
287:08:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
271:08:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
250:06:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
234:06:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
222:06:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
204:06:54, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
74:10:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
598:
574:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:AfDs for this article:
458:Speedy close and keep
403:This is ridiculous.
312:few or no other edits
314:outside this topic.
149:Railpage Australia
80:Railpage Australia
447:
315:
220:
589:
576:
438:
394:
387:
369:Recurring dreams
301:
216:
190:
172:
34:
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
585:
579:deletion review
572:
383:
381:
380:beyond that. –
163:
147:
144:
142:
139:
83:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
584:
583:
567:
566:
565:
564:
552:
551:
550:
549:
539:
527:
526:
525:
524:
480:
479:
468:
467:
455:
435:
434:
422:
410:
398:
374:
362:
346:
327:
326:
325:
300:. not notable
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
247:Fundie Busters
224:
201:Fundie Busters
197:
196:
143:
141:
140:
135:
133:
128:
123:
118:
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
87:
84:
82:
77:
44:The result was
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
582:
580:
575:
569:
568:
563:
560:
556:
555:
554:
553:
548:
545:
540:
538:
535:
531:
530:
529:
528:
523:
520:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
502:
499:
496:
493:
489:
487:
484:
477:
473:
470:
469:
466:
463:
459:
456:
454:
451:
445:
441:
437:
436:
433:
430:
426:
423:
421:
418:
414:
411:
409:
406:
402:
399:
397:
392:
388:
386:
378:
375:
373:
370:
366:
363:
361:
358:
354:
350:
347:
345:
342:
339:
336:
331:
328:
324:
321:
317:
316:
313:
309:
305:
304:124.190.97.81
299:
296:
288:
285:
281:
277:
274:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
248:
244:
243:administrator
240:
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
225:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
194:
188:
184:
180:
176:
171:
167:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
145:
138:
134:
132:
129:
127:
124:
122:
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
81:
78:
76:
75:
72:
69:
64:
60:
57:
54:
50:
47:
46:speedy closed
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
573:
570:
504:
490:
481:
471:
457:
439:
424:
412:
405:Nick mallory
400:
384:
376:
365:Speedy close
364:
349:Speedy close
348:
330:Speedy close
329:
297:
275:
264:Speedy Close
263:
259:
242:
238:
227:Speedy close
226:
209:
198:
55:
45:
43:
31:
28:
472:Weak delete
385:Luna Santin
310:) has made
231:Bongwarrior
49:Luna Santin
353:notability
210:correction
63:WP:CSD#G11
377:Comment:
239:Disagree
214:Tony Fox
193:View log
59:contribs
425:Comment
401:Comment
338:megalon
276:Comment
166:protect
161:history
559:Tezza1
544:Johnmc
534:Tezza1
519:Johnmc
506:Tezza1
462:Canley
450:Canley
298:Delete
284:Johnmc
268:Johnmc
218:(arf!)
170:delete
517:page.
357:Haemo
320:Haemo
254:From
187:views
179:watch
175:links
71:garra
16:<
440:Note
413:Note
391:talk
341:2000
335:Maxa
308:talk
183:logs
157:talk
153:edit
68:Gnan
53:talk
448:--
446:.
429:KTC
417:KTC
191:– (
302:—
185:|
181:|
177:|
173:|
168:|
164:|
159:|
155:|
393:)
389:(
306:(
258:"
195:)
189:)
151:(
56:·
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.