Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Reaping The Dungeon - Knowledge (XXG)

Source ๐Ÿ“

127:
Extremely nonnotable piece of old software. Article has been tagged as not establishing notability or having reliable sources etc. for more than a year. Was another article prodded but had the prod removed by a serial deprodder who never gives any adequate reasons for removing the tag.
244:
consists of user-generated content and is hence not considered a reliable source. Second, placing it as an external link under the References section makes it very hard for readers to determine whether an article is sourced or not. That's why we use
369:
Notability is the issue as I don't see it established that the game was widely distributed. I agree that we should be somewhat lenient in regards to proof required, but currently the sole source provides is basically a wiki/blog.
283:
find other sources, you're just very unlikely to find them online. Games prior to 1997 tend to have better coverage in print sources than online ones, as the later internet sources don't tend to go back to cover older products. --
352:
if they think they can get sources out of it. I'd be happy to give this the benefit of the doubt and leave it in userspace for 2-3 months for sources to be found because it's very unlikely to be something promotional. -
187:
Instead of just insisting that every article you see with a delete tag on it is notable, perhaps for once you'd like to offer an actual reason why... and one that follows actual Knowledge (XXG) criteria?
348:
Notability is not the issue. If the game was indeed released widely, it's clearly notable. The issue lies with the lack of sources and the difficulty to get any. I recommend someone to contact
349: 120: 265:- For once I'll agree with Esasus. This has historical value, it's not an advert and you're not going to find many sources for it other than the one or two already given. 148: 298:
And here I chucked my entire collection of PC Magazine back issues a few years ago... back when it had more than 10 paper pages! Real paper I tell you!
87: 82: 91: 74: 54: 17: 327:
is not adequate. One source only is given, twice. I encourage the expansion of references and might change my opinion to "Keep"
452: 36: 437: 420: 400: 379: 360: 340: 307: 293: 274: 253: 235: 221: 197: 178: 160: 137: 56: 451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
78: 433: 358: 212:- it is improper to remove the references contained in an article while the discussion is still in progress. 52: 70: 62: 396: 354: 301: 268: 250: 193: 133: 416: 156: 49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
246: 375: 336: 231: 217: 174: 289: 392: 209: 189: 129: 412: 152: 108: 429: 371: 332: 227: 213: 170: 324: 285: 241: 409: 445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
48:. Boston put it best: "notabilityness is not adequate". โ€“ 350:
Knowledge (XXG):Newspapers and magazines request service
226:
The reference in question is there twice needlessly. --
115: 104: 100: 96: 169:- Notable early DOS computer games released 1993. 428:due to the lack of coverage in reliable sources. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 455:). No further edits should be made to this page. 149:list of video game related deletion discussions 8: 147:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 408:here is the game creator's website 24: 1: 472: 329:if the article is improved 438:19:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 421:15:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 401:14:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 380:13:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 361:09:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 341:00:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 308:00:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 294:00:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 275:00:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 254:00:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 236:23:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 222:22:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 198:03:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 179:20:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 161:15:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 138:15:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 57:05:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 448:Please do not modify it. 411:Probably worth keeping. 32:Please do not modify it. 249:for this exact reason! 319:as notability must be 71:Reaping The Dungeon 63:Reaping The Dungeon 44:The result was 163: 463: 450: 306: 304: 273: 271: 247:inline citations 143: 118: 112: 94: 34: 471: 470: 466: 465: 464: 462: 461: 460: 459: 453:deletion review 446: 302: 299: 269: 266: 114: 85: 69: 66: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 469: 467: 458: 457: 441: 440: 423: 403: 385: 384: 383: 382: 364: 363: 343: 325:notabilityness 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 238: 203: 202: 201: 200: 182: 181: 164: 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 468: 456: 454: 449: 443: 442: 439: 435: 431: 427: 424: 422: 418: 414: 410: 407: 404: 402: 398: 394: 390: 387: 386: 381: 377: 373: 368: 367: 366: 365: 362: 359: 356: 351: 347: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 309: 305: 303:FreeRangeFrog 297: 296: 295: 291: 287: 282: 278: 277: 276: 272: 270:FreeRangeFrog 264: 261: 255: 252: 248: 243: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 199: 195: 191: 186: 185: 184: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 140: 139: 135: 131: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 447: 444: 425: 405: 388: 345: 328: 320: 316: 280: 262: 166: 144: 126: 50:Juliancolton 45: 43: 31: 28: 208:Comment to 279:Well, you 393:Unionsoap 391:per nom. 242:MobyGames 251:MuZemike 210:DreamGuy 190:DreamGuy 130:DreamGuy 121:View log 413:Kagetto 406:Comment 240:First, 153:MrKIA11 88:protect 83:history 430:Stifle 426:Delete 389:Delete 372:Boston 346:Userfy 333:Boston 317:Delete 228:Boston 214:Esasus 171:Esasus 116:delete 92:delete 46:delete 321:shown 286:Sabre 119:) โ€“ ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 434:talk 417:talk 397:talk 376:talk 337:talk 290:talk 263:Keep 232:talk 218:talk 194:talk 175:talk 167:Keep 157:talk 145:Note 134:talk 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 355:Mgm 331:.-- 281:can 436:) 419:) 399:) 378:) 370:-- 339:) 323:; 292:) 234:) 220:) 196:) 177:) 159:) 151:. 136:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 432:( 415:( 395:( 374:( 357:| 335:( 300:ยง 288:( 267:ยง 230:( 216:( 192:( 173:( 155:( 132:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Juliancolton


05:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Reaping The Dungeon
Reaping The Dungeon
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
DreamGuy
talk
15:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
list of video game related deletion discussions
MrKIA11
talk
15:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Esasus
talk
20:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DreamGuy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘