500:: You maybe right about the big, generic, and mainstream publications. However, I just want you to look at the variety of her creative works and also the wide range of her productions. In such a case how can you define someone as not a notable person? I invite you to look at many other musical composers in Knowledge (XXG), this page I have created from many aspects is more compact, tidy and well-presented. If in Knowledge (XXG) you are going to judge people's exact artistic worth with respect to their so-called fame then what is the point of creating such an independent world knowledge source? As you are an academician and as I am an academic person can you explain this to me? Creative works, compositions and educational insight must represent the real artistic stance of such people. Again I just invite you to comprehend the exact artistic value which the artist presents to the world, and I mainly ask you to recognise it as the world knowledge. If we are really going to prove every knowledge as truth based assumptions on the generic newspaper news then why do we need such a source at all? You are claiming that this artist has not any record label as such, please look at the same page again. Her newest album is coming from Navona Records, if you are in classical music industry you may have heard Parma Recordings and its branch of Navona ones. By the way, can you say that being an independent artist and also producing your own compositions on your own can be enough reason as an obstacle to your universality?
210:
commissioned by the
Bowerman family, which is the co-founder of NIKE. Consequently, I regard her commentary on my entry as completely biased and ungrounded in terms of her objections. In any part of this article you can not find self-serving statements. The entire category list with regard to the artist's creative works was carefully organised in line with her official records. In that manner, any part of the article cannot be labelled as routine coverage as such. This article requires better editors who can judge the exact universality of such important figures in the world and especially for this resource.
521:
a mistake that many new editors make. Knowledge (XXG) does not publish original research, it publishes articles based on what has already been published. It is not the place to raise the profile of an unknown but no doubt worthy artist. It is the place to record those whose career has already made a significant impact, an impact which can be
520:
Inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) is based on the criteria for notability as defined by Knowledge (XXG), which have been explained in depth above. It has nothing to do with artistic worth or accomplishment, and deletion discussions are not about a panel independently assessing someone's artistic talents,
185:
Contested PROD. Creator removed it saying that "this article is being tried to be improved by various sources," but if among the long list of minor awards and compositions already listed nothing has yet established notability, I doubt more work will. Just isn't notable - no significant coverage in
209:
I strongly disagree with your opinion, I think your objection itself does not represent a credible objectivity in itself. The artist I was working on to describe in this world's free knowledge has been so notable figure in the circles of
American classical music for years. In addition, she was
529:
cd. It hasn't come out yet. And even if it had already come out, it would be only one cd, and on a compilation with works by other people. It is simply not enough. Again, I emphasise that this is not a reflection on Ms. Oswald's talent or potential, it is simply the framework within which
266:
I can certainly clarify that I had not registered to
Knowledge (XXG) as the sole purpose of writing this article. I am a post graduate political philosophy student in Europe. I have many projects on Knowledge (XXG) especially for Turkish articles in my academic field.
441:
in the absence of substantial print coverage. But I'm afraid this still doesn't pass. Music played by highly notable ensembles or soloists in major venues? No evidence of this. Two recordings with a notable record label? One recording,
154:
301:
577:: I have added several more review and article references, in light of the editor's concerns about notability. I believe this should satisfy at least one of the notability criteria at
115:
329:
be established by a couple of published reviews by an independent and reputable newspaper or magazine. If these emerge from this Afd I'd be delighted to change my opinion. --
148:
394:: There are many languages given, but the German article doesn't exist. (I have no time to check others.) Why is English specified as a language in the en-WP? --
470:
show a total of 3 scores in 3 library holdings, one of which is her Master's thesis and the remaining two are self-published. The scores for the pieces on the
437:, and couldn't find anything but very local coverage, and none of it substantial. There are other ways the subject could pass the notability criteria at
356:
This discussion will remain open for at least seven days, so you should have time to identify reliable references to verify notability. --
283:
226:
88:
83:
17:
92:
186:
reliable sources. (I'll note for the purpose of this AfD that "Rebecca Oswald performed/will perform at this event" is generally
478:
and do not appear to be held in any libraries yet. By the way, the article has several chunks copy-pasted from her website and
419:
199:
75:
169:
136:
458:? No evidence of this. Multiple scores published by well-known music publishing houses and widely held in libraries? Her
604:
36:
130:
603:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
586:
505:
349:
I will try to find them, please give me enough time space...--M. Hikmet Luleci 11:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
279:
222:
590:
568:
543:
509:
491:
423:
403:
386:
365:
342:
316:
287:
271:
257:
230:
214:
203:
126:
57:
539:
487:
399:
79:
582:
501:
447:
275:
241:
218:
53:
578:
438:
176:
526:
187:
71:
63:
463:
415:
336:
251:
195:
162:
48:. I'm sorry Lulecimhikmet. I know you worked hard on this article but the consensus here is clear.
564:
455:
361:
556:
535:
483:
395:
382:
312:
244:: Did you join Knowledge (XXG) with the sole purpose of writing the Rebecca Oswald article? --
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
479:
142:
49:
467:
411:
331:
246:
191:
560:
357:
534:
Knowledge (XXG) editors have to work, whether or not we are academics in real life.
378:
308:
109:
446:, self-published. Winner of a notable and prestigious award for composition e.g.
451:
475:
459:
410:
It doesn't exist in any of the other languages. I'll remove those now.
597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
434:
302:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
607:). No further edits should be made to this page.
555:as unnotable, per the points noted by nom &
325:As with a number of similar Afds, notability
8:
296:
300:: This debate has been included in the
190:that does not establish notability.)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
474:recording are self-published at
1:
591:23:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
569:16:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
544:09:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
510:23:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
492:14:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
424:08:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
404:08:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
387:02:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
366:13:59, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
343:02:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
317:00:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
288:11:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
258:02:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
231:00:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
204:22:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
624:
433:I have a subscription to
58:01:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
600:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
482:without attribution.
448:Guggenheim Fellowship
456:Charles Ives Prize
435:this press archive
44:The result was
319:
305:
291:
274:comment added by
234:
217:comment added by
615:
602:
339:
334:
306:
290:
268:
254:
249:
233:
211:
188:routine coverage
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
623:
622:
618:
617:
616:
614:
613:
612:
611:
605:deletion review
598:
337:
332:
269:
252:
247:
212:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
621:
619:
610:
609:
572:
571:
549:
548:
547:
546:
527:Navona Records
495:
494:
427:
426:
407:
406:
389:
371:
370:
369:
368:
351:
350:
346:
345:
320:
293:
292:
263:
262:
261:
260:
236:
235:
183:
182:
119:
72:Rebecca Oswald
66:
64:Rebecca Oswald
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
620:
608:
606:
601:
595:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
583:Lulecimhikmet
580:
576:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
550:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
524:
519:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
502:Lulecimhikmet
499:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
372:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
347:
344:
341:
340:
335:
328:
324:
321:
318:
314:
310:
303:
299:
295:
294:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:Lulecimhikmet
273:
265:
264:
259:
256:
255:
250:
243:
242:Lulecimhikmet
240:
239:
238:
237:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:Lulecimhikmet
216:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
599:
596:
574:
573:
557:Voceditenore
552:
536:Voceditenore
531:
522:
517:
497:
496:
484:Voceditenore
472:October wind
471:
444:October wind
443:
430:
396:Gerda Arendt
391:
374:
330:
326:
322:
297:
270:— Preceding
245:
213:— Preceding
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
579:WP:MUSICBIO
439:WP:MUSICBIO
149:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
523:documented
452:Rome Prize
525:. Re the
462:identies
412:Roscelese
309:• Gene93k
192:Roscelese
561:Eusebeus
476:lulu.com
460:WorldCat
420:contribs
377:per nom.
358:Deskford
284:contribs
272:unsigned
227:contribs
215:unsigned
200:contribs
116:View log
575:Comment
518:Comment
498:Comment
392:Comment
379:4meter4
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
553:Delete
431:Delete
375:Delete
323:Delete
127:Google
93:delete
46:delete
333:Klein
327:could
248:Klein
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
587:talk
565:talk
540:talk
506:talk
488:talk
480:here
466:and
416:talk
400:talk
383:talk
362:talk
338:zach
313:talk
298:Note
280:talk
253:zach
223:talk
196:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
532:all
468:Two
464:One
307:--
177:TWL
114:– (
589:)
581:.
567:)
559:.
542:)
508:)
490:)
454:,
450:,
422:)
418:⋅
402:)
385:)
364:)
315:)
304:.
286:)
282:•
229:)
225:•
202:)
198:⋅
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
585:(
563:(
538:(
504:(
486:(
414:(
398:(
381:(
360:(
311:(
278:(
221:(
194:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.