341:
process..." give a summary of what the company does without relying on quotes and without sounding overly promotional. I guess I don't know what you mean by "independent of people directly affiliated with the company". Of course the articles get their information from people directly affiliated with the company; that doesn't mean they aren't reliable secondary sources. If those pieces had consisted of nothing but direct quotes or on-the-spot, breaking-news type coverage, then that would be different.
282:
said the emissions and odors from NOR are expected to be minimal compared to other operations they review, including cremations, demolitions of asbestos-filled buildings and marijuana cultivation. Recompose’s air permit requires no visible emissions from the facility, adequate filters, no detectable
340:
I'm not quite sure I understand...Reference 10 provides lots of background information and analysis that is independent of the subject, which is the definition of a secondary source. There are some quotes in there, but it's not an interview. The two paragraphs beginning with "The
Recompose
385:
a little secondary coverage in that article. The second clause of the Van Slyke quote could be that, and the paragraph immediately before the two you selected covering pricing would be considered secondary as well, but I don't see any analysis in those two paragraphs specifically. As for
390:'s requirement for intellectual independence doesn't necessarily explicitly say that it's stronger than "sufficient paraphrasing to be out of quote marks and still not be plagiarism," but it still very strongly implies it.
235:
This seems to be a self-promotional article written by an employee of
Recompose (just like the Katrina Spade article). Even ignoring the self-promotion, it seems that Recompose fails to meet the notability criteria.
258:
and are both independent and non-passing in nature. I agree that the article seems rather self-serving and should be trimmed down considerably. But the company does have detailed coverage in secondary sources.
204:
161:
319:
315:
198:
280:
coverage by Kiley. Can you point clearly to a passage independent of people directly affiliated with the company, other than the short quote from Van Slyke (who
93:
108:
311:
289:(as currently cited in the article) seem to be entirely quotes from Spade and Carpenter-Boggs, so I'm excluding it from my consideration for now.
421:, on the basis the company has clearly attracted more than passing interest, in a number of major news outlets, and internationally (BBC).
88:
81:
17:
399:
372:
298:
102:
98:
134:
129:
219:
138:
447:
40:
186:
165:
121:
346:
264:
180:
285:)? That segment does not seem secondary to me. Or, perhaps a second source? The BBC coverage mentioned by
443:
36:
176:
430:
403:
376:
350:
328:
302:
268:
245:
63:
395:
368:
294:
212:
387:
255:
342:
273:
260:
226:
241:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
442:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
360:
426:
391:
364:
323:
290:
192:
125:
237:
155:
422:
286:
117:
69:
54:
283:
odors and independent review by a third party every three months.
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
147:
143:
355:
I don't see how those paragraphs could be independent
254:. References 6, 10, and 12 (Seattle Times) establish
211:
225:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
450:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
309:
281:
276:, I have concerns with regards to the
252:Keep but tone down promotional content
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
314:lists for the following topics:
94:Introduction to deletion process
359:secondary. We could take it to
431:09:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
404:00:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
377:00:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
351:21:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
329:09:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
303:11:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
269:01:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
246:23:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
64:23:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
467:
440:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
166:edits since nomination
82:Articles for deletion
331:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
458:
326:
312:deletion sorting
230:
229:
215:
159:
141:
79:
62:
34:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:deletion review
324:
172:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
453:
452:
434:
433:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
386:independence,
381:I'd say there
333:
332:
307:
306:
305:
233:
232:
169:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
451:
449:
445:
441:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
416:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
384:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
343:WeirdNAnnoyed
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
330:
327:
321:
317:
313:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
279:
278:Seattle Times
275:
274:WeirdNAnnoyed
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
261:WeirdNAnnoyed
257:
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
243:
239:
228:
224:
221:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
178:
175:
174:Find sources:
170:
167:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
439:
437:
418:
382:
356:
277:
251:
234:
222:
216:
208:
201:
195:
189:
183:
173:
75:
56:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
199:free images
320:Washington
444:talk page
392:Alpha3031
388:WP:ORGIND
365:Alpha3031
325:Spiderone
316:Companies
291:Alpha3031
256:WP:SIGCOV
118:Recompose
70:Recompose
37:talk page
446:or in a
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
238:Kitzing
205:WP refs
193:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
177:Google
139:delete
423:Sionk
287:Sionk
220:JSTOR
181:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
427:talk
419:Keep
347:talk
318:and
265:talk
242:talk
213:FENS
187:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
50:keep
361:RSN
227:TWL
160:– (
52:.
429:)
402:)
398:•
383:is
375:)
371:•
363:?
357:or
349:)
322:.
301:)
297:•
267:)
244:)
207:)
164:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
60:iz
425:(
400:c
396:t
394:(
373:c
369:t
367:(
345:(
299:c
295:t
293:(
263:(
240:(
231:)
223:·
217:·
209:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
179:(
171:(
168:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
57:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.