255:
believe it meets our current standards, even if it was enough for a "no consensus" then: Of the sources considered then, the
BusinessWeek article is now a 404 I can't find an archived copy of, the LA Times article appears to be a reprint of a press release submitted to Bloomberg News, and the review in Stocks and Commodities possibly meets the criteria—if there are similar sources, we should consider refocusing the article on that particular product.
254:
Pretty much the whole article is promotional and I could not find any significant coverage. The funds they manage are LISTED, but the company seems not to be, and notability is not inherited. There was a significant expansion of the article concurrent with the previous AfD in 2012, but I do not
77:
218:
72:
332:
I'll also note that some of the employees of
Renaissance might be presumed notable under supplementary criteria of NBIO for being highly influential, but there is not an equivalent for companies I'm aware of.
212:
178:
309:
144:
139:
148:
261:
171:
131:
285:
402:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.
103:
118:
408:
394:
375:
346:
325:
301:
277:
56:
233:
200:
194:
98:
91:
17:
190:
342:
321:
297:
273:
240:
112:
108:
135:
354:
425:
40:
127:
62:
250:
Full disclosure, I found this article because it was posted to the #wikipedia-en irc for possible promotional issues.
206:
421:
36:
338:
317:
293:
269:
226:
390:
87:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
366:
334:
313:
289:
265:
403:
386:
53:
165:
78:
Articles for deletion/Renaissance
Capital (US company) (2nd nomination)
416:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
357:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
161:
157:
153:
225:
73:
Articles for deletion/Renaissance
Capital (US company)
363:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
239:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions
308:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
260:Note: This discussion has been included in the
262:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
8:
286:list of Finance-related deletion discussions
119:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
307:
283:
259:
70:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
385:Very promotional likely non notable
69:
24:
128:Renaissance Capital (US company)
104:Introduction to deletion process
63:Renaissance Capital (US company)
1:
94:(AfD)? Read these primers!
445:
409:11:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
57:15:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
418:Please do not modify it.
395:10:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
376:13:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
347:02:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
326:02:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
302:02:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
278:02:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
68:AfDs for this article:
92:Articles for deletion
378:
374:
328:
304:
280:
251:
109:Guide to deletion
99:How to contribute
436:
373:
371:
364:
362:
360:
358:
249:
244:
243:
229:
181:
169:
151:
89:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
379:
367:
365:
353:
351:
186:
177:
142:
126:
123:
86:
83:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
412:
411:
397:
361:
350:
330:
329:
305:
281:
247:
246:
183:
122:
121:
116:
106:
101:
84:
82:
81:
80:
75:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
410:
407:
406:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
387:🌸 1.Ayana 🌸
384:
381:
380:
377:
372:
370:
359:
356:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
257:
256:
252:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
188:Find sources:
184:
180:
176:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
93:
88:
79:
76:
74:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
415:
404:
399:
382:
368:
352:
331:
253:
248:
236:
230:
222:
215:
209:
203:
197:
187:
174:
85:
49:
47:
31:
28:
213:free images
369:Sandstein
422:talk page
335:Alpha3031
314:Alpha3031
290:Alpha3031
266:Alpha3031
37:talk page
424:or in a
405:HighKing
355:Relisted
172:View log
113:glossary
39:or in a
219:WP refs
207:scholar
145:protect
140:history
90:New to
54:Spartaz
400:Delete
383:Delete
191:Google
149:delete
50:delete
234:JSTOR
195:books
179:Stats
166:views
158:watch
154:links
16:<
391:talk
227:FENS
201:news
162:logs
136:talk
132:edit
241:TWL
170:– (
393:)
345:)
341:•
324:)
320:•
312:.
300:)
296:•
288:.
276:)
272:•
264:.
221:)
164:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
52:.
389:(
343:c
339:t
337:(
322:c
318:t
316:(
298:c
294:t
292:(
274:c
270:t
268:(
245:)
237:·
231:·
223:·
216:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
193:(
185:(
182:)
175:·
168:)
130:(
115:)
111:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.