254:
information is available and an article will be possible. It will continue from there until it is released and it will then be old news from there onwards. It's a shame so much contributor time is spent wrestling with speculation and constantly rebuilding articles on works-in-progress when it would
114:
157:
180:
There was an AfD for
Assassin's Creed 2 not too long ago under almost identical circumstances. Not enough information to warrant its own article. Yet.
17:
81:
76:
85:
189:
250:
No, thankyou. There is no need to try and sieve articles from gossip and forum chatter, there will be a point where enough
68:
277:
36:
259:
276:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
234:
262:
236:
221:
194:
169:
146:
256:
204:
for now. I'd be shocked if a sequel didn't happen eventually, but from where we stand now this fails
142:
205:
126:
243:
209:
49:
230:
184:
165:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
134:
217:
212:
if the "officially announced" assertion can be sourced, but the rest is just speculation.
138:
251:
130:
122:
181:
161:
64:
56:
102:
229:
Pure speculation. No verifiable information present to write an article with. -
213:
52:: "Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article"
255:
only have to be done once if it was left till it was released. Oh well.
270:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
98:
94:
90:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:). No further edits should be made to this page.
158:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
156:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
191:What I've done for Knowledge (XXG)
24:
1:
263:21:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
237:11:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
222:07:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
195:04:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
170:01:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
147:01:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
297:
248:"Resistance 3 is rumoured"
273:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
208:. Worth a mention in
244:Resistance (series)
210:Resistance (series)
44:The result was
172:
123:original research
288:
275:
192:
187:
152:
112:
106:
88:
34:
296:
295:
291:
290:
289:
287:
286:
285:
284:
278:deletion review
271:
190:
185:
108:
79:
63:
60:
48:under criteria
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
294:
292:
283:
282:
266:
265:
239:
224:
198:
197:
174:
173:
119:
118:
59:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
293:
281:
279:
274:
268:
267:
264:
261:
258:
253:
249:
246:
245:
240:
238:
235:
232:
228:
225:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
199:
196:
193:
188:
183:
179:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
116:
111:
104:
100:
96:
92:
87:
83:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
61:
58:
55:
53:
51:
47:
46:Speedy delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
272:
269:
247:
242:Redirect to
241:
226:
201:
186:(talk to me)
177:
153:
127:crystal ball
120:
65:Resistance 3
57:Resistance 3
45:
43:
31:
28:
129:gazing. No
206:WP:CRYSTAL
139:Beeblebrox
133:Contested
182:ZappyGun
252:reliable
121:Blatant
115:View log
260:another
257:Someone
178:Comment
162:MrKIA11
131:sources
82:protect
77:history
227:Delete
214:BryanG
202:Delete
110:delete
86:delete
113:) – (
103:views
95:watch
91:links
16:<
218:talk
166:talk
154:Note
143:talk
135:prod
99:logs
73:talk
69:edit
231:Mgm
137:.
220:)
168:)
160:.
145:)
101:|
97:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
75:|
71:|
50:A1
233:|
216:(
164:(
141:(
125:/
117:)
107:(
105:)
67:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.