Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Responsible Research and Innovation - Knowledge

Source 📝

429:: I'm sorry to disagree with the other editors who've suggested this for deletion, but Responsible Research and Innovation is a reputable academic discipline that not only gets EU funding but substantial amounts of funding in the UK from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. It's about anticipatory governance in technology projects - ie the sort of ethical consideration that could (it is hoped) in the future prevent some of the data misuse and technological scandals that have become all too prevalent. There is a very solid basis of academic research, some of which is already cited here, and Research Councils are including requirements for Responsible Research and Innovation in their calls for funding from universities. For example it's included as part of the work on quantum computing that several universities in the UK are participating in. I am happy to rewrite the article, which I agree isn't very good, but it's definitely not promotional. 469::The proposer says "One reason I voted for Brexit is because my money is going on non-notable projects such as this.". But WikiPedia deletion policy clearly says that "Articles on topics you wish didn't exist for personal belief reasons" is NOT a reason to delete a page. Responsible Research and Innovation is research area funded by the EU, UK research councils, the US National Science Foundation, and others. I don't care why you voted for Brexit. This is totally irrelevant to serious academic research, and your personal opinions don't come into it. 368:— just explaining a term that is roughly as opaque as any other that I've seen used by all scientific funding agencies everywhere. I loathe this kind of language roughly as much as anyone who has had to deal with those agencies, but that in itself isn't a reason to delete an article about it. 212: 383: 299: 557:
concerns have been addressed: news and academic sources demonstrate notability, we give due weight to criticisms/concerns so it can't be called promotional, and a top-down rewrite removed the copyvio text.
567: 634:
and great effort from XOR who cleaned the article well. XOR also raises a good point. This nominator did not have to bring Brexit or politics up in this AfD, especially this coming from an administrator.
459: 395: 377: 355: 331: 342:
Over 5,000 hits on Google Scholar and in-depth news coverage indicate that this is one of those management terms that we really ought to have an article for. I have trimmed the article back (
206: 138: 133: 142: 165: 125: 319: 172: 406: 112: 531:, please discuss the nomination itself, attacking the nominator while also not saying anything about the article is not really a good thing to do in AfD. 97: 129: 227: 194: 493: 121: 73: 644: 622: 595: 540: 520: 478: 438: 418: 310: 290: 262: 67: 188: 593: 553:. "I voted Leave" is not an argument (nor, of course, are "I voted Remain", "I am above politics and refuse to vote", etc.). The 184: 92: 85: 17: 258: 234: 617: 283: 106: 102: 663: 200: 40: 487: 474: 640: 536: 278: 483: 470: 659: 563: 455: 434: 391: 373: 351: 327: 36: 430: 591: 414: 220: 528: 512: 360:
Having cut it down and added new material based on the academic literature, I don't see anything
306: 252: 243:
One reason I voted for Brexit is because my money is going on non-notable projects such as this.
444: 636: 532: 516: 81: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
658:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
604: 582: 559: 451: 387: 369: 347: 323: 62: 612: 586: 496:) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. 247:
thinks it is spam but it has survived four years so I will let it have this discussion. —
545:
Yes, we expect deletion discussions to be about the article. But in fairness, we expect
443:
Thanks for mentioning quantum computing! I found a few references on RRI in that field:
508: 410: 361: 446: 631: 608: 578: 550: 302: 248: 159: 53: 448: 504: 272: 244: 364:
in the article as it currently stands. It's certainly not promoting a
652:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
271:: I'm surprised it's survived for four years but I agree with 155: 151: 147: 219: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 666:). No further edits should be made to this page. 551:don't bring in the nominator's personal politics 405:Note: This discussion has been included in the 318:Note: This discussion has been included in the 384:Earwig's Copyvio Detector now finds no problems 233: 8: 549:to be about the article, too, and that they 320:list of Science-related deletion discussions 113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 407:list of Europe-related deletion discussions 481: 404: 317: 298:: it is unambiguous promotion. See also 603:per the massive cleanup effort done by 346:back) to make a reasonable stub of it. 275:'s assessment that it is G11-worthy. 450:. Are you aware of more/better ones? 7: 382:Oh, and with the old stuff cut out, 122:Responsible Research and Innovation 74:Responsible Research and Innovation 24: 98:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 645:18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 623:16:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 596:15:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 568:13:57, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 541:01:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC) 521:21:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC) 503:: Next you propose to delete 479:10:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 460:13:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 439:09:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC) 419:20:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 396:20:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 378:19:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 356:18:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 332:18:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 311:18:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 291:14:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 263:11:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC) 68:01:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC) 511:because you are against? -- 88:(AfD)? Read these primers! 683: 655:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 86:Articles for deletion 497: 421: 334: 103:Guide to deletion 93:How to contribute 674: 657: 620: 615: 288: 286: 281: 238: 237: 223: 175: 163: 145: 83: 60: 34: 682: 681: 677: 676: 675: 673: 672: 671: 670: 664:deletion review 653: 618: 613: 284: 279: 277: 180: 171: 136: 120: 117: 80: 77: 54: 52:, as improved. 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 680: 678: 669: 668: 648: 647: 625: 611:accomplished. 598: 572: 571: 570: 523: 509:United Ireland 498: 484:Pingleresearch 471:Pingleresearch 464: 463: 462: 423: 422: 401: 400: 399: 398: 380: 336: 335: 314: 313: 293: 241: 240: 177: 116: 115: 110: 100: 95: 78: 76: 71: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 679: 667: 665: 661: 656: 650: 649: 646: 642: 638: 633: 629: 626: 624: 621: 616: 610: 606: 602: 599: 597: 594: 592: 590: 589: 584: 580: 576: 573: 569: 565: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 543: 542: 538: 534: 530: 527: 524: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 499: 495: 492: 489: 485: 480: 476: 472: 468: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 447: 445: 442: 441: 440: 436: 432: 428: 425: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 403: 402: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 338: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 316: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 297: 296:Speedy delete 294: 292: 289: 287: 282: 274: 270: 269:Speedy delete 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 257: 254: 250: 246: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182:Find sources: 178: 174: 170: 167: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 140: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 114: 111: 108: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 87: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 654: 651: 637:Jovanmilic97 627: 600: 587: 574: 554: 546: 533:Jovanmilic97 525: 500: 490: 466: 426: 365: 343: 339: 295: 276: 268: 255: 242: 230: 224: 216: 209: 203: 197: 191: 181: 168: 79: 63: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 628:Strong Keep 581:as done by 555:substantive 547:nominations 431:Octaviapink 362:promotional 207:free images 605:XOR'easter 588:Ritchie333 583:XOR'easter 560:XOR'easter 452:XOR'easter 388:XOR'easter 370:XOR'easter 348:XOR'easter 324:XOR'easter 660:talk page 411:DannyS712 37:talk page 662:or in a 505:feminism 494:contribs 303:JimRenge 259:contribs 249:RHaworth 166:View log 107:glossary 39:or in a 529:Oisguad 526:Comment 513:Oisguad 366:product 213:WP refs 201:scholar 139:protect 134:history 84:New to 632:WP:HEY 609:WP:TNT 579:WP:HEY 285:(talk) 185:Google 143:delete 57:bd2412 228:JSTOR 189:books 173:Stats 160:views 152:watch 148:links 16:< 641:talk 630:Per 614:Brad 601:Keep 577:per 575:Keep 564:talk 537:talk 517:talk 501:Keep 488:talk 475:talk 467:Keep 456:talk 435:talk 427:Keep 415:talk 392:talk 374:talk 352:talk 340:Keep 328:talk 307:talk 280:SITH 253:talk 221:FENS 195:news 156:logs 130:talk 126:edit 50:keep 507:or 344:way 273:DGG 245:DGG 235:TWL 164:– ( 643:) 607:. 585:. 566:) 539:) 519:) 482:— 477:) 458:) 437:) 417:) 409:. 394:) 386:. 376:) 354:) 330:) 322:. 309:) 301:. 261:) 215:) 158:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 639:( 619:v 562:( 535:( 515:( 491:· 486:( 473:( 454:( 433:( 413:( 390:( 372:( 350:( 326:( 305:( 256:· 251:( 239:) 231:· 225:· 217:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 187:( 179:( 176:) 169:· 162:) 124:( 109:) 105:( 64:T

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
bd2412
T
01:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Responsible Research and Innovation

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Responsible Research and Innovation
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.