322:; on the whole I agree with the concerns that have been expressed above. On the question of the translation of "Rheinische Sprache", I suspect that the word "Rhenish" would be the closest term in English. I don't know if this would be the same thing as the Rhenish dialect of German, on which subject Google Books finds
175:- there is a corresponding article in the German Knowledge (XXG) and the Germans live happily with it. They gave three (similar) meanings of "Rheinische Sprache" and our article is about the third one. (Both English and German articles seem to be of low quality, but it is possible to make them better.)--
193:
I wouldn't read to much into the link - if you look through the history, it's apparent that the link to the German article is the work of the same user who wrote most of the nonsense on this page. In any case, the German page doesn't inspire confidence - it's just an unsourced listing of usages, with
212:
is the appropriate and most widely used
English translation of "Rheinische Sprache". If Rhinelandic is not used, its German counterpart seems to be used albeit infrequently by German writers, as Google Scholar brings up 1,880 hits for Rheinische + Sprache, the vast majority of the Rheinische's are
162:
is not used in
Germanic linguistics - there is simply no need for an article with this title. No one has been able to cite any published peer-reviewed work in which the term is used. Add to this the fact that the content itself is clueless nonsense. I originally questioned the value of this article
339:
when one introduces quotation marks. Still significant, but since the German wikipedia treats the term as ambiguous (I read it as saying there is a High German accent, a
Standard German dialect, and a bunch of Low German local variants) I am still concerned that the present article is OR.
213:
not of the
Sprache, but of the University or location of the research, which are not relevant however, Google Scholar also brings up a couple of hits for "Rheinische Mundart" but that gets us in to the eternal langauge (Sprache) vs. dialect (Mundart) debate.
374:. But the unreferenced content is a problem. Move most of it to the talk page pending reference inclusion, leaving a valid stub. P.S. I also tagged the German page for lack of references, in case that will bring any forward.
134:
163:
10 months ago. The fact that no one has attempted to answer the criticisms in all that time suggests that there is no need to delay deletion any further. --
273:, which divides Low from High German. Original reasearch; whether or not this is a genuinely useful concept, we would do better starting over.
290:, seems like OR, but, like Ioannes Pragensis said, there is an article on the German Wikpipedia, and a Google search turns up a few results.
66:
17:
269:
both clearly divides the tonal area into two language areas and clearly fails to conceal they are yet very similar." The
English is
71:
253:
Googling suggests that the word is used to discuss dialects. Whether it is a colloquial or technical term is unclear, however.
107:
102:
111:
94:
393:
36:
392:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
61:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
176:
323:
378:
357:
336:
330:
312:
294:
282:
257:
242:
217:
198:
188:
179:
167:
149:
76:
370:. Dialects are a serious topic in German, probably more so than in English, so this may be a case of
353:
308:
278:
184:
And even if it's not the proper translation, it should be kept as a redirect to the more proper one.
291:
238:
214:
56:
53:
341:
146:
327:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
371:
300:
98:
368:
349:
304:
274:
142:
49:
266:
233:
375:
270:
185:
128:
254:
226:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
209:
159:
90:
82:
195:
164:
141:
Contested speedy. Unreferenced article about some term, suspected of being
386:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
367:. Clearly this is not completely made up, e.g. see sidebar in:
194:
no implication that the term has any status in linguistics. --
303:, which would be "Rhenish language" or "dialect" in English.
145:. I suppose it should be deleted if no sources can be found.
348:, of which at least 4 have nothing to do with language.
124:
120:
116:
231:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
396:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
299:Note, however, that the German article is
158:It should be deleted because the term
208:we should be check to make sure that
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
265:; babble, badly translated. "The
48:. Should be cleaned up to remove
1:
413:
389:Please do not modify it.
379:01:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
358:03:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
331:00:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
313:03:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
295:23:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
283:20:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
258:03:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
243:23:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
199:10:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
189:01:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
77:20:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
324:over 600 separate works
218:22:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
180:20:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
168:16:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
150:14:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
301:de:Rheinische Sprache
356:
311:
281:
245:
177:Ioannes Pragensis
143:original research
50:original research
404:
391:
352:
307:
277:
241:
230:
227:
132:
114:
74:
69:
64:
59:
34:
412:
411:
407:
406:
405:
403:
402:
401:
400:
394:deletion review
387:
350:Septentrionalis
305:Septentrionalis
275:Septentrionalis
232:
225:
105:
89:
86:
72:
67:
62:
57:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
410:
408:
399:
398:
382:
381:
362:
361:
360:
317:
316:
315:
292:Tim.bounceback
285:
267:Benrather line
260:
247:
246:
229:
221:
220:
215:Carlossuarez46
203:
202:
201:
191:
170:
139:
138:
85:
80:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
409:
397:
395:
390:
384:
383:
380:
377:
373:
369:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
338:
335:That becomes
334:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
293:
289:
286:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
259:
256:
252:
249:
248:
244:
240:
237:
236:
228:
223:
222:
219:
216:
211:
207:
204:
200:
197:
192:
190:
187:
183:
182:
181:
178:
174:
171:
169:
166:
161:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
148:
144:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
84:
81:
79:
78:
75:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
388:
385:
365:Keep as stub
364:
345:
319:
287:
271:Benrath line
262:
250:
234:
224:
205:
172:
155:
140:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
342:Rhinelandic
210:Rhinelandic
160:Rhinelandic
91:Rhinelandic
83:Rhinelandic
354:PMAnderson
309:PMAnderson
279:PMAnderson
251:Maybe keep
135:View log
376:Dhaluza
372:WP:BIAS
337:83 hits
288:Neutral
186:Dhaluza
147:W.marsh
108:protect
103:history
54:King of
328:ChrisO
320:Delete
263:Delete
255:Mangoe
239:scribe
156:Delete
112:delete
344:gets
326:. --
196:Pfold
165:Pfold
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
206:Keep
173:Keep
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
235:WjB
133:– (
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
52:.
346:5
137:)
131:)
93:(
73:♠
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.