Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Richard Curtis (literary agent) - Knowledge

Source 📝

641:" If NY Times posited in their own word that he's been influential or significant, that's something else. By the way, should we use NAUTHOR, or should we use guidelines that would normally be applied to general business person because the purported notability is for "literary agent" ? 632:
Reading through some of the sources, it doesn't seem convincing to me that he's accepted as being significant and influential with the way some of the source writes, for example "IN a book to be published this month by Houghton Mifflin, the literary agent Richard Curtis charges that
201: 659:
I agree he doesn't technically qualify for NAUTHOR. However he has stronger sourcing for inclusion than some authors. But yet perhaps not enough for ANYBIO/GNG. For me it's a close call, however I end up as
515: 195: 493: 285: 127: 122: 131: 544: 476:
review here - "A flaccid, formless book, overweighted with scenes of childhood .. and gratuitous gossip .. and overprotective of Chiang's reputation.", love this one!:)
114: 511:
mentioned this title as one of the books on publishing that he loved (near the end under "Is there anything you know about the business that most writers don’t?")),
305: 265: 154: 482: 449: 161: 101: 86: 216: 504: 183: 567:, Curtis has been in the literary publishing game for a long time, but has he been significant/influential in any way? Well, in 2000 PW 177: 673: 650: 620: 556: 535: 429: 404: 383: 361: 341: 317: 297: 277: 257: 56: 464: 173: 81: 74: 17: 568: 374:
It doesn't. I meant only that the article contains inaccurate information. If I were "voting," it would be a weak delete.
223: 604: 590: 118: 460: 471: 95: 91: 486: 110: 62: 690: 475: 453: 425: 189: 40: 616: 552: 531: 580: 686: 36: 600: 421: 53: 669: 646: 595: 400: 357: 313: 293: 273: 253: 245: 209: 395:, ok thank you for your clarification. If you have a position, please consider placing your vote. 664:
given what I think is borderline GNG combined with an article that is heavily promotional. Best,
612: 585: 548: 527: 379: 337: 523: 350: 70: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
685:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
576: 497: 233: 665: 642: 396: 353: 309: 289: 269: 249: 241: 572: 519: 390: 375: 333: 237: 608: 148: 500: 240:. The page is based on trivial coverages, press releases and primary sources. 569:
named him amongst 11 people to help shape the book business for the millenium
508: 583:, his name/thoughts regularly appear in articles about the industry eg. in 349:
clarify please. What do you mean? I am not seeing how that book satisfies
442: 438: 681:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
581:"Some of the (publishing) industry’s most innovative reps .." 445:, still held (allbeit ebooks?) in numerous libraries eg. 144: 140: 136: 208: 286:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
579:included him in a roundtable question session of 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 693:). No further edits should be made to this page. 543:Note: This discussion has been included in the 304:Note: This discussion has been included in the 284:Note: This discussion has been included in the 264:Note: This discussion has been included in the 545:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 522:) so may not be such an outright "doesn't meet 306:list of New York-related deletion discussions 222: 8: 591:"Publishing: Agent Says Writers Are Cheated" 328:- Sloppily written--has the novelization of 266:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 609:"Literary Agents: Midwives for New Authors" 639:some publishers are still cheating authors 542: 303: 283: 263: 441:of Curtis' books that are, according to 635:publishers have always cheated authors, 7: 232:Does not satisfy notability under 24: 513:How to get your e-book published 87:Introduction to deletion process 111:Richard Curtis (literary agent) 63:Richard Curtis (literary agent) 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 601:"Publishers at the floodgates" 1: 605:The Christian Science Monitor 77:(AfD)? Read these primers! 710: 248:) 17:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 683:Please do not modify it. 674:01:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 651:05:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 332:as published in 1972... 57:16:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 621:23:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 557:14:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 536:14:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 430:20:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 405:10:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 384:12:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 362:02:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 342:17:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 318:17:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 298:17:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 278:17:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 258:17:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 498:Publisher Weekly (PW) 491:Beyond the Bestseller 480:The Berrigan Brothers 437:, lots of reviews by 420:a non-notable writer. 75:Articles for deletion 458:So Much To Live For 586:The New York Times 559: 447:The Genial Idiots 422:John Pack Lambert 320: 300: 280: 92:Guide to deletion 82:How to contribute 54:Black Kite (talk) 701: 526:" after all(?). 394: 227: 226: 212: 164: 152: 134: 72: 34: 709: 708: 704: 703: 702: 700: 699: 698: 697: 691:deletion review 577:Writer's Digest 505:in a PW Q&A 503:) (incidently, 469:Chiang Kai-shek 388: 169: 160: 125: 109: 106: 69: 66: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 707: 705: 696: 695: 677: 676: 656: 655: 654: 653: 624: 623: 561: 560: 539: 538: 520:PW review here 432: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 367: 366: 365: 364: 322: 321: 301: 281: 230: 229: 166: 105: 104: 99: 89: 84: 67: 65: 60: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 706: 694: 692: 688: 684: 679: 678: 675: 671: 667: 663: 658: 657: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 631: 628: 627: 626: 625: 622: 618: 614: 613:Coolabahapple 610: 606: 602: 598: 597: 592: 588: 587: 582: 578: 574: 573:Jane Friedman 570: 566: 563: 562: 558: 554: 550: 549:Coolabahapple 546: 541: 540: 537: 533: 529: 528:Coolabahapple 525: 521: 517: 516:170 libraries 514: 510: 506: 502: 499: 495: 494:245 libraries 492: 488: 484: 483:200 libraries 481: 477: 473: 472:190 libraries 470: 466: 462: 461:80 libraries 459: 455: 451: 450:140 libraries 448: 444: 440: 436: 433: 431: 427: 423: 419: 416: 415: 406: 402: 398: 392: 387: 386: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 363: 359: 355: 352: 348: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 324: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 295: 291: 287: 282: 279: 275: 271: 267: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 225: 221: 218: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 175: 172: 171:Find sources: 167: 163: 159: 156: 150: 146: 142: 138: 133: 129: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 103: 100: 97: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 78: 76: 71: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 682: 680: 661: 638: 634: 629: 594: 584: 564: 512: 490: 479: 468: 457: 446: 434: 417: 346: 329: 325: 231: 219: 213: 205: 198: 192: 186: 180: 170: 157: 68: 49: 47: 31: 28: 575:writing in 501:review here 487:review here 465:review here 454:review here 196:free images 524:WP:NAUTHOR 351:WP:NAUTHOR 687:talk page 666:Barkeep49 643:Graywalls 509:Garth Nix 397:Graywalls 354:Graywalls 330:Halloween 310:Graywalls 290:Graywalls 270:Graywalls 250:Graywalls 242:Graywalls 234:WP:ANYBIO 37:talk page 689:or in a 596:Overland 443:WorldCat 391:Caro7200 376:Caro7200 334:Caro7200 155:View log 96:glossary 39:or in a 565:Comment 435:Comment 347:comment 326:Comment 202:WP refs 190:scholar 128:protect 123:history 73:New to 662:delete 571:, and 439:Kirkus 418:Delete 238:WP:GNG 174:Google 132:delete 50:delete 637:that 630:reply 217:JSTOR 178:books 162:Stats 149:views 141:watch 137:links 16:< 670:talk 647:talk 617:talk 553:talk 532:talk 426:talk 401:talk 380:talk 358:talk 338:talk 314:talk 294:talk 274:talk 254:talk 246:talk 210:FENS 184:news 145:logs 119:talk 115:edit 489:), 478:), 467:), 456:), 236:or 224:TWL 153:– ( 672:) 649:) 619:) 611:. 607:- 603:, 599:- 593:, 589:- 555:) 547:. 534:) 507:, 428:) 403:) 382:) 360:) 340:) 316:) 308:. 296:) 288:. 276:) 268:. 256:) 204:) 147:| 143:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 121:| 117:| 52:. 668:( 645:( 615:( 551:( 530:( 518:( 496:( 485:( 474:( 463:( 452:( 424:( 399:( 393:: 389:@ 378:( 356:( 336:( 312:( 292:( 272:( 252:( 244:( 228:) 220:· 214:· 206:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 181:· 176:( 168:( 165:) 158:· 151:) 113:( 98:) 94:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Black Kite (talk)
16:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Richard Curtis (literary agent)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Richard Curtis (literary agent)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.