275:
Brewercrewer, My father is actually better known in the United States for his work with
Falconry. Few people here in the US have jobs that depend on falcons. For the first three years at CFCS he was a big fish in a small pond. He also founded the school where Tim Duncan learned to play Basketball, I
257:
No you didn't - you are referring to me, and I need to set straight that I never argued that
Seattle was a non-notable city. You need to actually demostrate notability through publication in reliable, independent, third-party sources. Given that I have now been indirectly mentioned in this AfD, I
168:
I see that you are
Portuguese. To argue that a profile of the founder of the Caribbean Food Crop Society is marginal is the equivalent of an argument that a profile on the founder of the Portuguese Chamber of Commerce must be marginal because after all it is in Portugal. I think you have a stronger
235:
Eco, I had this sort of argument before when someone felt that
Seattle was not a notable City while they were trying to add every village in England. Speaking of songs there were complaints about the first Conference as the United States paid for the Colonial Prime Ministers to stay in a five star
353:
There were a fair number of Google hits under
Richard M. Bond in relation mostly to his work with ornithology. He was considered to be one of the 250 top specialist in ornithology in the US by Cooper Ornithological Society. His specialty was falcons particularly the Peregrine.
490:, the article itself would need a complete organization to make it encyclopedic. Sometimes it is better to scrape clean and start anew, but there is not much in the article to indicate that it would be worth the effort.
412:- I concur with the delete stance (see below), but please confine comments to the content. Notability is determined without regard to the motivations and approach of any individual author. Also,
236:
hotel. It was part of the competition against Castro. Some St. Vincentians got upset that their island
Government decided to close the sugar mill. An American heard about it and wrote "
416:
does not automatically exist just because the author is related to the subject. It is the nature of the edits themselves, not the position of the author, that determines COI.
324:
139:
298:
is demonstrated. At the moment there is very little to go on in terms of substantive coverage by third-party reliable sources. GoogleBooks also produces very little
299:
106:
101:
110:
93:
146:
Subject appears to be of less-than-marginal notability. Furthermore, it appears that the article's author is the son of the article's subject
169:
argument on the basis of COI but I think some third party who is both 1) impartial and 2)familiar with his contributions would be helpful.
371:
Then find a third-party source that tells us that he was some notable expert. It isn't enough to tell us what he wrote - look at
337:
220:
442:- notability not established. Publishing a paper doesn't automatically confer notability. However, if it can be established by
17:
61:
210:
499:
462:
432:
404:
383:
363:
346:
314:
285:
267:
249:
228:
201:
178:
162:
75:
514:
36:
97:
513:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
147:
89:
81:
237:
359:
281:
245:
174:
342:
225:
197:
158:
379:
263:
68:
395:- Not notable and author has not only a COI but a confrontational approach to article creation.
186:
My heritage is irrelevant to this discussion, though I will gladly take out my guitar and play
400:
188:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
301:, mostly references to catalogues/listst of Yale graduates. Might concievably be notable per
495:
355:
277:
241:
170:
455:
425:
332:
310:
215:
193:
154:
375:
302:
259:
213:(which would make Richard Marshall Bond a redirect) and rearrange article's context. --
475:
471:
413:
295:
150:
53:
49:
479:
443:
396:
127:
491:
487:
483:
372:
449:
419:
306:
507:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
470:(I apologize, couldn't resist) In addition to the likely
134:
123:
119:
115:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
517:). No further edits should be made to this page.
325:list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions
276:will put together a page on the CFCS though
8:
474:problems and lack of evidence of meeting
323:: This debate has been included in the
305:but that case has not been made either.
7:
24:
192:if the discussion gets dull. :)
149:, which offers a bit of sticky
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
446:, I would change my opinion.
211:Caribbean Food Crops Society
258:will not be making a !vote
534:
500:00:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
463:21:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
433:21:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
405:19:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
384:21:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
364:20:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
347:19:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
315:18:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
286:17:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
268:18:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
250:17:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
229:16:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
202:11:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
179:11:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
163:10:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
76:05:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
510:Please do not modify it.
294:, unless notability per
32:Please do not modify it.
50:non-notable individual
478:by using independent
90:Richard Marshall Bond
82:Richard Marshall Bond
238:Joshua Gone Barbados
480:reliable assertions
44:The result was
461:
431:
349:
328:
189:April in Portugal
525:
512:
460:
458:
452:
447:
430:
428:
422:
417:
340:
335:
329:
319:
223:
218:
137:
131:
113:
73:
66:
58:
34:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
524:
523:
522:
521:
515:deletion review
508:
456:
450:
448:
426:
420:
418:
338:
333:
221:
216:
133:
104:
88:
85:
69:
62:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
531:
529:
520:
519:
503:
502:
465:
437:
436:
435:
389:
388:
387:
386:
351:
350:
317:
273:
272:
271:
270:
233:
232:
204:
181:
144:
143:
84:
79:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
530:
518:
516:
511:
505:
504:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:verifiability
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:Lete, de Lete
466:
464:
459:
453:
445:
441:
438:
434:
429:
423:
415:
411:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
385:
381:
377:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
348:
345:
344:
341:
336:
326:
322:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
269:
265:
261:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
231:
230:
227:
224:
219:
212:
208:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
185:
182:
180:
176:
172:
167:
166:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
141:
136:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
83:
80:
78:
77:
74:
72:
67:
65:
59:
57:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
509:
506:
467:
439:
409:
392:
352:
343:(yada, yada)
331:
320:
291:
274:
234:
226:(yada, yada)
214:
206:
187:
183:
145:
70:
63:
55:
45:
43:
31:
28:
356:RichardBond
278:RichardBond
242:RichardBond
171:RichardBond
488:notability
482:to enable
397:Rob Banzai
194:Ecoleetage
155:Ecoleetage
376:Fritzpoll
260:Fritzpoll
140:View log
410:Comment
303:WP:PROF
184:Comment
107:protect
102:history
492:B.Wind
476:WP:BIO
472:WP:COI
451:Frank
440:Delete
421:Frank
414:WP:COI
393:Delete
339:crewer
296:WP:BIO
292:Delete
222:crewer
151:WP:COI
135:delete
111:delete
46:delete
457:talk
444:WP:RS
427:talk
307:Nsk92
138:) – (
128:views
120:watch
116:links
56:jonny
48:as a
16:<
496:talk
401:talk
380:talk
373:WP:N
360:talk
334:brew
321:Note
311:talk
282:talk
264:talk
246:talk
217:brew
207:Move
198:talk
175:talk
159:talk
124:logs
98:talk
94:edit
52:. --
486:of
330:--
327:.
209:to
498:)
454:|
424:|
403:)
382:)
362:)
313:)
284:)
266:)
248:)
240:"
200:)
177:)
161:)
153:.
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
494:(
399:(
378:(
358:(
309:(
280:(
262:(
244:(
196:(
173:(
157:(
142:)
132:(
130:)
92:(
71:t
64:m
60:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.