405:
Analog Game
Studies is a good source, the others seem like definitions or brief mentions in the middle of talking about something else. Usually one solid source is still not enough to merit a full page. Therefore I am still not "convinced", though I will admit there is a non zero amount of coverage
369:
431:
is not correct here. The third one does talk about the concept in a larger context, but has significant analysis way beyond a definition (what it means for the game, contrast to other concept,...). So is there material
364:
358:
177:
41:
352:
564:
coverage is sufficient to meet WP:N and we have more than just a dictionary definition. I could see a broader article on this plus related things such as RAW and RAI (as mentioned above).
134:
387:, and later be spun out again as soon as someone uses the listed sources further. But aside from that fact that I see no advantage in that, it would already be akward to fit in the
375:
has a full essay on the topic. How can 6+ pages contain "only a definition"? So it seems to me the nomination is mostly talking about the current status of the article, which is
249:
288:. While you may enjoy the article, personal preference doesn't factor into AfDs, only evidence that a full article can be created based on the idea of "rules lawyering".
241:
171:
245:
36:
66:
270:. come on, this is the stuff we come to Knowledge (XXG) for. Suppose it could be merged somewhere; would support that if appropriate placement is identified.
81:
237:
588:
494:
61:
54:
17:
498:
107:
102:
573:
556:
521:
503:
466:
445:
415:
400:
332:
311:
297:
279:
261:
229:
111:
75:
71:
192:
94:
159:
320:
217:
543:
which discuss two sides of the same coin. A list is a better place for this, since a standalone article is borderline
138:
544:
209:
346:
The article as it is now, although short, already has some content which would not fit into a dictionary. And a
220:, but that one is more in a legal context than a gaming one, and not exactly well-sourced or stable in itself.
490:
427:
The first two books (sorry, I had a wrong link there) each have a specific section dedicated to the topic, so
153:
532:
475:
384:
316:
149:
307:
275:
391:
contexts where same term may pop up, but more rarely so if the Google Books search is any indication.
593:
285:
199:
552:
480:
185:
347:
441:
396:
433:
411:
328:
293:
257:
225:
98:
50:
376:
350:
search shows that various sources dealing with table-top roleplaying games have more to say:
517:
303:
271:
213:
569:
165:
548:
582:
462:
437:
392:
422:
407:
324:
289:
253:
221:
90:
27:
128:
513:
565:
302:
I’m satisfied what’s there shows it can. Tell me where you would merge it.
458:
368:
all have about a page of content, including commentary. And the journal
478:. The relevance of the "Related terms" seems very tenuous to me.
429:
brief mentions in the middle of talking about something else
212:
as the article only consists of a definition. A potential
124:
120:
116:
184:
198:
42:
Articles for deletion/Rules lawyer (2nd nomination)
512:, Related terms would appear to be NOTDICTIONARY.
434:to expand the article beyond the length of a stub
379:. All that said, the first and primary paragraph
236:Note: This discussion has been included in the
406:about the concept of rules lawyering in RPGs.
8:
82:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
319:seems like a better place to merge it than
235:
377:not decisive when deciding about deletion
365:The Postmodern Joy of Role-Playing Games
34:
428:
359:The Civilized Guide to Tabletop Gaming
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
457:based on sources found by Daranios.
323:given its predominant use in RPGs.
37:Articles for deletion/Rules lawyer
24:
240:lists for the following topics:
67:Introduction to deletion process
574:17:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
557:13:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
522:20:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
504:00:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
467:16:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
446:10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
416:23:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
401:15:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
333:07:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
312:07:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
298:07:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
280:06:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
262:06:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
230:06:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
589:AfD debates (Games or sports)
321:letter and spirit of the law
218:Letter and spirit of the law
57:(AfD)? Read these primers!
610:
531:main article content into
474:that one paragraph into
533:Role-playing game terms
476:Role-playing game terms
385:Role-playing game terms
317:Role-playing game terms
33:AfDs for this article:
139:edits since nomination
55:Articles for deletion
371:Analog Game Studies
208:Simple failure of
502:
264:
72:Guide to deletion
62:How to contribute
601:
545:WP:NOTDICTIONARY
537:Rule as Intended
484:
426:
383:be merged in to
238:deletion sorting
210:WP:NOTDICTIONARY
203:
202:
188:
132:
114:
52:
609:
608:
604:
603:
602:
600:
599:
598:
579:
578:
541:Rule as Written
420:
145:
105:
89:
86:
49:
46:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
607:
605:
597:
596:
591:
581:
580:
577:
576:
559:
526:
525:
524:
481:ClaudineChionh
469:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
436:? Absolutely!
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
265:
206:
205:
142:
85:
84:
79:
69:
64:
47:
45:
44:
39:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
606:
595:
592:
590:
587:
586:
584:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
506:
505:
500:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
477:
473:
470:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
447:
443:
439:
435:
430:
424:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
372:
367:
366:
361:
360:
355:
354:
349:
345:
342:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
140:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
83:
80:
77:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
59:
58:
56:
51:
43:
40:
38:
35:
29:
26:
19:
561:
540:
536:
535:, alongside
528:
509:
508:Concur with
486:
479:
471:
454:
388:
380:
370:
363:
357:
351:
343:
267:
216:is merge to
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
91:Rules lawyer
48:
28:Rules lawyer
594:AfD debates
304:Hyperbolick
272:Hyperbolick
172:free images
583:Categories
362:p. 66 and
286:WP:ILIKEIT
250:Psychology
549:Jtwhetten
353:On A Roll
348:WP:BEFORE
495:contribs
438:Daranios
393:Daranios
242:Language
135:View log
76:glossary
487:she/her
423:Zxcvbnm
408:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
373:Vol. IV
356:p. 45,
325:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
290:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
254:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
248:, and
222:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
178:WP refs
166:scholar
108:protect
103:history
53:New to
514:IgelRM
214:WP:ATD
150:Google
112:delete
566:Hobit
529:Merge
510:merge
499:email
472:Merge
389:other
381:could
246:Games
193:JSTOR
154:books
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
570:talk
562:Keep
553:talk
539:and
518:talk
491:talk
463:talk
455:Keep
442:talk
397:talk
344:Keep
308:talk
284:See
276:talk
268:Keep
186:FENS
160:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
459:BOZ
252:.
200:TWL
133:– (
585::
572:)
555:)
520:)
497:·
493:·
489:·
465:)
444:)
414:)
399:)
331:)
310:)
296:)
278:)
260:)
244:,
228:)
180:)
137:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
568:(
551:(
547:.
516:(
501:)
485:(
461:(
440:(
425::
421:@
412:ᴛ
410:(
395:(
329:ᴛ
327:(
306:(
294:ᴛ
292:(
274:(
258:ᴛ
256:(
226:ᴛ
224:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
131:)
93:(
78:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.