660:, you used the phrase "typical routine local coverage" above in one of your comments so I responded. As to the rest of this "dance" going on, I don't dance and leave the evaluation of disagreements up to the closing admin. The fact that I'm a Knowledge (XXG) admin myself has no bearing on this AFD (I'm simply participating as an interested editor) and I'm unsure why that's mentioned.--
792:
is as follows: "Comment on content, not on the contributor. . . . Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done. When in doubt, comment on the article's content without referring to its contributor at all." Calling someone "clueless" (i.e.
637:
CFBCoach is always used by the same few people trying to avoid having to show that the subjects meet the GNG, and is a last resort when nothing else works. It is not a convincing argument to use to keep an article, as it is circular reasoning. The same goes for your mantra of "typical
914:. The closing admin need not resolve the broader debate presented here between Fram and Paulmcdonald as to whether or not all head coaches should be presumed notable. In this case, the consensus is clear (at a 5-to-2 rate) that the coverage of Mains is sufficient to pass
729:
You've overstepped in your edit summary calling Paul "clueless" (dictionary definition: "having no knowledge, understanding, or ability"). We can have differing views on the notability of S.L. Mains, but the personal attacks are wholly unnecessary.
213:
285:
865:
with a number of related AFDs so readers can review what is a "typical outcome" of an AFD on a college football head coach. It's useful information and germane to this discussion.--
265:
248:
could be found. The information from the non-reliable sources findagrave and rootsweb contradicts each other (perhaps that's why these are not relaible and shouldn't be used?)
415:
has been met. As the discussion has turned to an essay, I'm not inclined to change my position. I'll let the consensus determine if the sources I gave you are enough for GNG.
166:
390:
At your suggestion, I've now rewritten this to the point where it is now at least a "passable stub" supported by reliable sources. Will you now consider changing to "keep"?
305:
643:
Please stick to policies and guidelines, and even more importantly don't misrepresent either these or the opinions of others (when you use them as strawman arguments).
561:
207:
560:
is typical routine local coverage. Which leaves us only with the two local obituaries, which at least talk about his sporting career (unlike what is the case at
325:
98:
113:
793:"having no knowledge, understanding, or ability") is a derogatory comment not on the content, but on the contributor. This should be avoided.
173:
611:
Paulmcdonald, as an admin, it would be better if you didn't constantly misuse essays and guidelines in your effort to keep these articles.
678:) successful use of our policies, guidelines, and essays. While a !vote at AfD doesn't involve the use of tools, any admin who points to
818:
675:
93:
86:
17:
594:
597:. It's been found useful for a number of reasons, including as a place where discussions are refined and improved over time.--
139:
134:
143:
107:
103:
228:
788:
Not an issue with my feelings. Just trying to keep things civil, and your comments crossed the line. The simple gist of
195:
126:
944:
40:
449:
549:
444:
The notion advanced by some that every "head" football coach at every college ever is notable is just ludicrous.
348:
767:
694:
423:
367:
553:
189:
686:
and lacks clue. Even your obvious dishonesty about linkrot is unbecoming an admin but sadly not punishable.
880:
622:
888:
870:
844:
826:
665:
602:
940:
185:
36:
927:
892:
874:
858:
854:
848:
830:
802:
774:
739:
701:
679:
669:
652:
606:
590:
573:
539:
518:
501:
482:
462:
453:
430:
399:
374:
336:
317:
297:
277:
257:
68:
356:
493:
445:
836:
618:
586:
582:
783:
761:
755:, which talks about use of reasoning rather than use of rhetoric. A professional critique is not a
724:
688:
535:
417:
385:
361:
235:
221:
514:
470:
557:
884:
866:
840:
822:
661:
598:
329:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
939:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
810:
752:
352:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
359:
you could write a passable stub. As an immediatist, I don't support retaining this article.
130:
915:
814:
544:
CFBCOACH is an essay, not an accepted guideline, and with good reason. As for the sources:
527:
466:
412:
245:
923:
798:
735:
478:
395:
63:
789:
581:
good sources, typical outcome for college football head coaches is to keep the article.
545:
201:
683:
648:
569:
531:
313:
293:
273:
253:
465:, and I added several sources which are sufficient to demonstrate that he also passes
593:
essay is widely used, referenced, and linked in discussions--one of the standards in
510:
160:
122:
74:
552:
shows notability for the team, not really for Mains or others mentioned in it,
919:
794:
756:
746:
731:
474:
406:
391:
53:
657:
644:
565:
309:
289:
269:
249:
839:, one editor mentioned a source "gives a 404 error" so I responded.--
347:
This article doesn't make a claim of notability. With sources like
935:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
857:. I did use the phrase "typical outcome" when referring to
879:
FYI also --- (and hopefully finally) I didn't reference
621:: what we do have though, is your constantly misapplied
628:"Local sources must be independent of the subject, and
156:
152:
148:
286:
list of
American football-related deletion discussions
220:
562:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/F. W. Sweeney
234:
630:must provide reports beyond routine game coverage.
548:is not a reliable source (just like findagrave),
266:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
947:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:Note: This discussion has been included in the
304:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
264:Note: This discussion has been included in the
614:No one mentioned LINKROT, so that's a strawman
853:FYI also -- I cannot find any link I made to
625:, which actually explicitly contradicts you:
564:), but are not really sufficient in my view.
306:list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions
8:
114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
751:It used to be that admins read stuff like
323:
303:
283:
263:
326:list of Iowa-related deletion discussions
863:Head coach notability discussion library
759:, even if they both hurt your feelings.
490:Meets GNG per the sources from Cbl62. ~
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
819:User:Chris troutman/My RfA criteria
595:Knowledge (XXG):The value of essays
585:applies to events and not people.
24:
589:is not a reason to delete. The
99:Introduction to deletion process
1:
883:in this discussion either.--
89:(AfD)? Read these primers!
964:
928:16:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
893:21:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
875:21:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
849:21:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
831:21:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
803:22:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
775:20:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
740:19:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
702:18:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
670:18:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
653:15:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
607:04:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
574:09:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
540:03:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
519:20:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
502:18:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
483:03:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
454:01:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
431:14:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
400:03:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
375:15:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
337:14:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
318:14:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
298:14:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
278:14:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
258:14:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
244:No evidence that he meets
69:01:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
674:Being an admin requires (
937:Please do not modify it.
461:. Mains qualifies under
32:Please do not modify it.
821:are also all essays.--
87:Articles for deletion
556:gives a 404 error,
861:which contains a
617:No one mentioned
526:per Cbl62. Meets
446:John Pack Lambert
339:
320:
300:
280:
104:Guide to deletion
94:How to contribute
955:
835:FYI also -- per
787:
773:
770:
764:
750:
728:
700:
697:
691:
496:
429:
426:
420:
410:
389:
373:
370:
364:
334:
239:
238:
224:
176:
164:
146:
84:
66:
61:
34:
963:
962:
958:
957:
956:
954:
953:
952:
951:
945:deletion review
781:
768:
762:
760:
757:personal attack
744:
722:
695:
689:
687:
682:both suffers a
494:
424:
418:
416:
404:
383:
368:
362:
360:
330:
181:
172:
137:
121:
118:
81:
78:
64:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
961:
959:
950:
949:
931:
930:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
877:
851:
833:
807:
806:
805:
784:Chris troutman
763:Chris Troutman
725:Chris troutman
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
690:Chris Troutman
684:cognitive bias
641:
640:
639:
635:
634:
633:
615:
576:
542:
521:
504:
485:
456:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
419:Chris Troutman
411:I don't think
386:Chris troutman
378:
377:
363:Chris Troutman
341:
340:
321:
301:
281:
242:
241:
178:
117:
116:
111:
101:
96:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
960:
948:
946:
942:
938:
933:
932:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
910:
909:
894:
890:
886:
885:Paul McDonald
882:
881:WP:SPORTBASIC
878:
876:
872:
868:
867:Paul McDonald
864:
860:
856:
852:
850:
846:
842:
841:Paul McDonald
838:
834:
832:
828:
824:
823:Paul McDonald
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
791:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
771:
765:
758:
754:
748:
743:
742:
741:
737:
733:
726:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
703:
698:
692:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
667:
663:
662:Paul McDonald
659:
656:
655:
654:
650:
646:
642:
636:
631:
627:
626:
624:
623:WP:SPORTBASIC
620:
616:
613:
612:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
599:Paul McDonald
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
577:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
503:
499:
498:
497:
489:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
439:
432:
427:
421:
414:
408:
403:
402:
401:
397:
393:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
371:
365:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
338:
335:
333:
327:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
187:
184:
183:Find sources:
179:
175:
171:
168:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
115:
112:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
62:
60:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
936:
934:
911:
862:
629:
578:
523:
506:
492:
491:
487:
458:
441:
344:
332:CAPTAIN RAJU
331:
243:
231:
225:
217:
210:
204:
198:
192:
182:
169:
80:
57:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
859:WP:CFBCOACH
855:WP:OUTCOMES
680:WP:OUTCOMES
591:WP:CFBCOACH
509:per Cbl62.
463:WP:CFBCOACH
208:free images
123:S. L. Mains
75:S. L. Mains
837:WP:LINKROT
676:to my mind
619:WP:ROUTINE
587:WP:LINKROT
583:WP:ROUTINE
941:talk page
658:User:Fram
638:outcome".
532:Ejgreen77
37:talk page
943:or in a
546:rootsweb
511:Jweiss11
471:WP:BASIC
167:View log
108:glossary
39:or in a
912:Comment
811:WP:CLUE
753:WP:CLUE
214:WP refs
202:scholar
140:protect
135:history
85:New to
916:WP:GNG
815:WP:HEY
528:WP:GNG
467:WP:GNG
442:Delete
413:WP:HEY
355:, and
345:Userfy
246:WP:BIO
186:Google
144:delete
920:Cbl62
809:FYI--
795:Cbl62
790:WP:PA
747:Cbl62
732:Cbl62
475:Cbl62
407:Cbl62
392:Cbl62
229:JSTOR
190:books
174:Stats
161:views
153:watch
149:links
16:<
924:talk
889:talk
871:talk
845:talk
827:talk
817:and
813:and
799:talk
769:talk
736:talk
696:talk
666:talk
649:talk
645:Fram
603:talk
579:Keep
570:talk
566:Fram
558:this
554:this
550:this
536:talk
524:Keep
515:talk
507:Keep
495:EDDY
488:Keep
479:talk
469:and
459:Keep
450:talk
425:talk
396:talk
369:talk
357:this
353:this
349:this
314:talk
310:Fram
294:talk
290:Fram
274:talk
270:Fram
254:talk
250:Fram
222:FENS
196:news
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
56:brad
52:. –
50:keep
236:TWL
165:– (
926:)
918:.
891:)
873:)
847:)
829:)
801:)
738:)
668:)
651:)
605:)
572:)
538:)
530:.
517:)
500:~
481:)
473:.
452:)
398:)
351:,
328:.
316:)
308:.
296:)
288:.
276:)
268:.
256:)
216:)
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
65:🍁
922:(
887:(
869:(
843:(
825:(
797:(
786::
782:@
772:)
766:(
749::
745:@
734:(
727::
723:@
699:)
693:(
664:(
647:(
632:"
601:(
568:(
534:(
513:(
477:(
448:(
428:)
422:(
409::
405:@
394:(
388::
384:@
372:)
366:(
312:(
292:(
272:(
252:(
240:)
232:·
226:·
218:·
211:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
188:(
180:(
177:)
170:·
163:)
125:(
110:)
106:(
58:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.