Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Working dog - Knowledge

Source 📝

555:, which describes working dogs (in a non-exhaustive manner) as: "Thus, in the United States today, working dogs may include guide dogs, service dogs, assistance dogs, therapy dogs, or dogs that search airplanes for explosives, monitor our borders for the entry of illegal drugs and plants, or search for people who are lost in avalanches, the wilderness, and in natural or man-made disasters.". Here is a book chapter: 580:, thank you for finally finding some usable RS, now I think we have the basis for an article. I cannot read any of the second link but the first clearly articulates a broad definition of the term, whilst it specifies this interpretation of the term to be American, in time this may be expanded upon. Here in Australia the term is very much confined to sheep and cattle dogs ( 256:), it is not RS given its own terms of service states it does "not warrant that the content is accurate, reliable or correct". A google search revealed a number of books from Australia, but in Australia the term "working dog" only refers to sheep and cattle dogs, which is reflected in the sources. I suspect the page is a good faith creation because a number of 534:
I accept this proposal appears to be unpopular and so should probably be closed as keep, but it was whilst conducting research to attempt to improve the page I discovered I could find no reliable secondary sources that define "working dogs" as the broad type described in the article, and despite some
528:
and two about drug detection dogs. Of the remaining three, one opens it to "any purebred dogs that are 16 inches at the withers", one makes mention of explosive detection dogs, guide dogs and military working dogs without further expansion and the last is a study about a population of military
556: 605:
My understanding is that "Working dog" these days is any trained dog that is used in a non-pet or hobby context. I am not sure just how American this is, or whether it is just the favored term. I don't recall hearing this term when I was younger, though
550:
It is not surprising that sources often focus on particular subsets of working dogs, such as military working dogs. In journal articles I provided, I selected some from the first page of results on google scholar. Here is one from the second page:
529:
working dogs. None come close to actually defining working dogs as "a canine working animal, i.e., a type of dog that is not merely a pet but learns and performs tasks to assist and/or entertain its human companions, or a breed of such origin".
652:-- this is an overview article and is suitable for inclusion. I search google books for "working dogs" and the book titles that come up show that "working dog" is not just for military working dogs. For example: 210: 664:("In addition, the term 'working dog' is often used very loosely because 'terriers', 'sheepdogs', 'protecting dogs', 'sledge dogs', or 'gundogs' are all working breeds,..."). Etc. -- 163: 590:, the papers you presented earlier demonstrate that in Britain the term may also be used to describe military working dogs. I have withdrawn the nomination above. Regards, 204: 394: 430: 427: 110: 95: 421: 170: 581: 560: 709: 418: 331: 326: 335: 285: 280: 251: 136: 131: 90: 83: 17: 289: 140: 694:. I'm not sure how much work it may need in that regard, but probably some. The content needs to be more consistent with 318: 225: 584: 272: 192: 123: 417:. This can't be serious. Sourcing of the present article could be improved, but it is trivial to locate sources. BBC: 104: 100: 731: 40: 186: 439: 436: 433: 552: 499:-Working dog(s) is a "must be" in any encyclopedia, improve sources if the current ones are unreliable.-- 727: 706: 669: 441:. Working dogs assist the blind, sniff drugs, served in armed forces, herd sheep, and many other tasks. 182: 36: 714: 673: 633: 619: 599: 572: 544: 508: 491: 475: 450: 406: 385: 368: 322: 65: 276: 629: 595: 540: 521: 381: 364: 504: 402: 232: 218: 59: 471: 424: 686:
that various dogs are trained for and, to some extent, bred with the intention of. It is not a
615: 568: 446: 79: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
726:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
698:(another role-not-type/breed article), even if "Dog work" might be an awkward article title. 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
701: 665: 127: 607: 625: 591: 536: 463: 377: 360: 198: 500: 398: 241:
Fails GNG. Only one of the cited sources on the page actually mentions "working dogs" (
54: 682:. It needs to be very clear to the reader (in the lead and throughout) that this is a 488: 467: 243: 611: 577: 564: 559:, covering sled dogs and herding dogs as case studies for the wider class. A book: 517: 459: 442: 314: 352: 306: 157: 263:
Additionally nominating the following redirects that relate solely to this page:
587: 525: 462:
layout a lot of great sources for GNG, but the subject can also qualify through
268: 257: 119: 71: 695: 691: 458:– Working dogs are a core article in the wiki world of dogs. Not only did 687: 624:
Interesting, it’s a shame they don’t provide the context it was used in.
484: 553:
The modern working dog—a call for interdisciplinary collaboration
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
658:
Working Sheep Dogs: A Practical Guide to Breeding, Training...
654:
Ranch Dog: A Tribute to the Working Dog in the American West
563:
covering the interdisciplinary science of working dogs.
535:
sensationalist language none have been presented here.
348: 344: 340: 302: 298: 294: 153: 149: 145: 586:) and apparently the editors of the Oxford Dictionary 217: 520:, one uses the term "working dog" exclusively about 376:- RS supporting the term has been presented below. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 734:). No further edits should be made to this page. 393:Note: This discussion has been included in the 561:Canine Ergonomics: The Science of Working Dogs 231: 8: 111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 395:list of Animal-related deletion discussions 392: 662:Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition 7: 516:- of the eight sources provided by 24: 610:thinks this dates back to 1885. 254:from the original on 2015-10-21. 96:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 483:- op. cit. Eostrix's comment. 1: 699: 715:23:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 674:20:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 634:09:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC) 620:14:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 600:14:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 573:10:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 545:10:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 509:20:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 492:20:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 476:17:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 451:12:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 407:11:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 386:14:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC) 369:10:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC) 66:05:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 86:(AfD)? Read these primers! 751: 557:Evolution of working dogs 260:have a "working group". 724:Please do not modify it. 52:. Nomination withdrawn. 32:Please do not modify it. 426:, The Washington Post: 680:Keep but maybe clarify 432:... Journal articles: 420:, The New York Times: 374:Withdrawn by nominator 522:military working dogs 84:Articles for deletion 409: 101:Guide to deletion 91:How to contribute 742: 713: 356: 338: 310: 292: 255: 236: 235: 221: 173: 161: 143: 81: 62: 57: 34: 750: 749: 745: 744: 743: 741: 740: 739: 738: 732:deletion review 608:Merriam Webster 329: 313: 283: 267: 242: 178: 169: 134: 118: 115: 78: 75: 60: 55: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 748: 746: 737: 736: 718: 717: 685: 677: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 588:think likewise 531: 530: 511: 494: 478: 453: 411: 410: 358: 357: 311: 244:"Working Dogs" 239: 238: 175: 114: 113: 108: 98: 93: 76: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 747: 735: 733: 729: 725: 720: 719: 716: 711: 708: 705: 704: 697: 693: 689: 683: 681: 678: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 648: 647: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 604: 603: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 582: 579: 576: 575: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 549: 548: 546: 542: 538: 533: 532: 527: 523: 519: 515: 512: 510: 506: 502: 498: 495: 493: 490: 486: 482: 479: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 454: 452: 448: 444: 440: 437: 434: 431: 428: 425: 422: 419: 416: 413: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 391: 390: 389: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 366: 362: 354: 350: 346: 342: 337: 333: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 291: 287: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 265: 264: 261: 259: 253: 249: 245: 234: 230: 227: 224: 220: 216: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 184: 181: 180:Find sources: 176: 172: 168: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 116: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 85: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 64: 63: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 723: 721: 702: 692:breed of dog 679: 661: 657: 653: 649: 526:herding dogs 524:, two about 513: 496: 480: 455: 414: 373: 372: 359: 315:Working dogs 262: 258:kennel clubs 247: 240: 228: 222: 214: 207: 201: 195: 189: 179: 166: 77: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 703:SMcCandlish 688:type of dog 666:K.e.coffman 497:Strong keep 481:Speedy keep 456:Speedy keep 269:Working Dog 248:dogtime.com 205:free images 120:Working dog 72:Working dog 50:speedy keep 696:Dog sports 626:Cavalryman 592:Cavalryman 537:Cavalryman 378:Cavalryman 361:Cavalryman 728:talk page 399:Shellwood 37:talk page 730:or in a 468:Missvain 464:WP:BASIC 252:Archived 164:View log 105:glossary 39:or in a 612:Eostrix 578:Eostrix 565:Eostrix 518:Eostrix 514:Comment 460:Eostrix 443:Eostrix 332:protect 327:history 286:protect 281:history 211:WP refs 199:scholar 137:protect 132:history 82:New to 56:Schwede 690:nor a 583:& 501:Darius 336:delete 290:delete 183:Google 141:delete 353:views 345:watch 341:links 307:views 299:watch 295:links 226:JSTOR 187:books 171:Stats 158:views 150:watch 146:links 16:< 684:role 670:talk 650:Keep 630:talk 616:talk 596:talk 569:talk 541:talk 505:talk 489:Talk 472:talk 447:talk 415:Keep 403:talk 382:talk 365:talk 349:logs 323:talk 319:edit 303:logs 277:talk 273:edit 219:FENS 193:news 154:logs 128:talk 124:edit 712:😼 485:Elf 233:TWL 162:– ( 700:— 672:) 660:; 656:; 632:) 618:) 602:. 598:) 571:) 547:. 543:) 507:) 487:| 474:) 466:. 449:) 438:, 435:, 429:, 423:, 405:) 397:. 388:. 384:) 367:) 351:| 347:| 343:| 339:| 334:| 330:| 325:| 321:| 305:| 301:| 297:| 293:| 288:| 284:| 279:| 275:| 250:. 246:. 213:) 156:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 61:66 710:¢ 707:☏ 676:‎ 668:( 636:. 628:( 614:( 594:( 567:( 539:( 503:( 470:( 445:( 401:( 380:( 363:( 355:) 317:( 309:) 271:( 237:) 229:· 223:· 215:· 208:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 185:( 177:( 174:) 167:· 160:) 122:( 107:) 103:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Schwede
66
05:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Working dog

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Working dog
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.