543:, you state that this "is indeed intended as an attack page." I don't agree. It should be noted that this is not a run-of-the-mill scam--this scam is so bizarre that it takes a fair amount of space to report the company's ruthless activities, and the article contains only a fraction of them. For example, not one patent was ever brought to be profitable after the thousands of dollars that trusting people spent--actually one was but it was dropped by the company after a time and then the owner took out a patent on it for himself. Or for example you believe that the so-called board members need only their names listed. This would really be an egregious fault of us as editors because the board members, other than Whitaker, appeared to have no idea that they were taking part in a scam. That is not to say that they should have followed up on their initial agreement to check the company out, though, other than Whitaker they all returned and money they had made.
1023:. In other words, the cited policy directly contradicts the point the nominator is using it to advance.Moving the article to draftspace is inappropriate. Draftspace is intended to develop articles that don't yet meet notability or other criteria, but this article is already amply sourced and comprehensive. It can of course be improved, and issues of weight can be hashed out, but in that regard it is no different from hundreds of thousands of other mainspace articles. Policy states that draftifying
1031:, but that seems to be exactly how it's being employed here.As best I can tell, the underlying complaint seems to be that the article reflects negatively on a Trump-Administration figure. First of all, an article describing a scam that bilked people out of large amounts of money will—if neutrally written—sound "negative", because most people perceive scamming people out of money negatively. I don't see any actual BLP violations identified or even posited, just
842:. We do not have a BLP1E equivalent for companies: if they only become notable as a scam, then they're still notable and that's how we report on them. It's not Knowledge (XXG)'s fault that secondary sources have tied Whitaker to WPM, and any debate about the mention in his bio needs to be had on that talk page, not here. There was coverage before Trump's pick of Whitaker, so this was not simply a blip of reporting related to Trump:
588:. The advisory board provides non-binding advice, it is very informal in nature, and has no authority to vote on corporate matters or bear legal fiduciary responsibilities. Readers who don't know or may not understand the capacity/duties of an advisory board could easily misinterpret the role Whitaker played, and the manner in which this article has been presented is part of what makes it unacceptable.
1039:. The kindest explanation for this nomination and the support for deleting or hiding an article that clearly meets notability criteria is that there's been a collective, hopefully temporary, collapse of competence on the part of several experienced editors. I mean, this borders on a disruptive AfD nomination, given how patently obvious it is that this subject meets
882:. However, it's no surprise that the surge of reporting in late 2018 was what brought the company to the article creator's attention and there is no evidence of ill-intent. Since then, many reliable sources have prominently discussed Whitaker's role at WPM, including that he was aware of and involved in responding to complaints (e.g.
744:
whether or not the company was in fact scamming people, and whether or not
Whitaker was aware of that. This could just as easily be interpreted as Whitaker confronting a would-be extortionist on behalf of the company because he believed it was legitimate, and that the customer complaint amounted to
749:
is sitting in prison right now due to such an extortion attempt against a company. To be clear, the sources do not hesitate to say that the WPM's founder, Scott Cooper, was aware that it was a scam. There is not a single source that says that
Whitaker in fact knew that the company was a scam, or
615:
There is, of course, no evidence whatsoever that
Whitaker had any more idea of the scam than any other board member; the actual investigation resulted in no finding of wrongdoing on Whitaker's part, and it is therefore just as likely that he was scammed as any other board member. DGG's point is
519:
for re-editing to. ensure NPOV coverage. The article as it is seems grossly over-detailed. The various named people can just be listed with their professions, and linked to the WP articles. The details of their practice are unnecessary. From the way this has been written , I think it was indeed
563:
I think it a sufficiently notable scam for an article, but it was nothing sensational. This sort of exploitation of naïve people applying for patents was not their invention. It is possible that much of the notability is due to the fact that they were able to enroll or pretend to enroll a
887:
226:
The company was only in business for 3 years and is one of many scam start-ups in the "invention/patent" industry. The company is only notable for its choice of advisors who were high profile individuals, and now those individuals are noncompliance issues per
315:
the “WPM news" was added and rewritten in the
Whitaker BLP - it is not in any of the other high profile BLPs of advisory board members, including the scientist or the occupy Democrats founder, even though other high profile people were on the advisory
951:
718:
There was no evidence that
Whitaker knew company salespeople were making false promises to inventors, court receiver Jonathan Perlman said in an interview. “I have no reason to believe that he knew of any of the wrongdoing,” Perlman
1014:
suggests a deep lack of understanding of that policy—and constitutes a completely unsupported aspersion against the creators and editors of the article, as well as a massive and inappropriate assumption of bad faith. Bizarrely,
957:
334:
was reverted by
Smartse. ::I'm of the mind that there is enough evidence to demonstrate what appears to me to be an attack page. This article should be deleted considering the large number of marketing/patent company refunds
195:
692:"The emails the FTC obtained, in fact, suggests Whitaker used his background as a U.S. attorney to try to silence customers who claimed they were defrauded by the company and sought to take their complaints public."
671:"Documents in the FTC’s docket show that Whitaker, who served on the World Patent Marketing board from 2014 to 2017, was not just a paid advisory board member -- he threatened at least one victim who complained."
824:
per DDG. The talk page of the article and the way the article is written certainly make it appear this is an attempt to smear a person rather than to actually talk about a business of questionable notability.
783:
is a reasonable outcome pending determination of whether the article has been constructed so as to highlight roles of some parties while diminishing that of others in order to present a biased narrative.
693:
807:
Keep per
Goldsztajn. If BD2412 has any RS that supports favorable conduct of any parties that have been diminished it should be presented at the article talk page where discussion is ongoing.
405:
908:
Knowledge (XXG) is only following the reliable sources. On the other hand, I doubt other advisory board members should have quotes from WPM press releases included - that seems
430:
189:
156:
564:
particularly high number of notable people as members of the board. W. was just one of them. His notability and their notability overlap, but do not depend on each other.
867:
520:
intended as an attack page, and is therefore unsuitable for mainspace. But since the firm is actually a notable scam, we can justify an article, but not this article.
380:
716:
who cites WaPo where there is political bias. Read the
Telegram article that Forbes cited. They quoted other advisory board members, as well as the court receiver:
721:
To imply otherwise in this article or
Whitaker's BLP is noncompliant with WP:GUILT. It's not always easy, but our job as editors is to avoid the tempation to RGW.
88:
906:
103:
899:
129:
124:
133:
863:
750:
provides information that could not as easily be explained by
Whitaker believing that he was defending a legitimate enterprise from extortionists.
116:
997:
875:
328:
Trump announced Whitaker would assume the role. (It was added to the Whitaker article on that date - the same day the WPM article was created.
895:
977:
913:
713:
981:
851:
616:
well-taken. This article is being used more as a vessel of highlighting board member affiliation than in examining the company itself.
210:
83:
76:
17:
985:
879:
177:
970:
891:
97:
93:
916:, but any other advisory board member for whom we cannot find secondary coverage should only be listed, nothing more. See
859:
855:
903:
929:
171:
1066:
991:
40:
1049:
964:
934:
871:
843:
834:
816:
799:
765:
735:
707:
631:
602:
575:
552:
531:
511:
494:
467:
447:
422:
397:
369:
282:
245:
120:
58:
167:
1020:
1016:
458:
comprehensively referenced article, don't see issues with verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns.
306:
847:
1036:
290:
217:
745:
an effort by the customer to concoct a smear against the company. That sort of thing happens with regularity—
921:
732:
599:
444:
419:
394:
366:
279:
242:
1011:
298:
112:
64:
1032:
1021:"is not necessarily an attack page, even if the content in question reflects negatively upon its subject"
1007:
302:
1062:
812:
703:
548:
36:
1024:
294:
507:
261:
183:
1019:
is cited as a reason to delete, when that policy actually states that an article spun out of a BLP
1002:, etc. This one isn't even close, and to claim as the nominator does that it "unequivocally fails"
463:
203:
1006:
shows—to be charitable—a complete lack of familiarity with relevant policy.The nomination lists a
830:
585:
53:
909:
340:
228:
946:
significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
490:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1061:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
478:
265:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
808:
794:
760:
746:
699:
626:
544:
352:
336:
1040:
1003:
943:
502:
folders full of RS meeting the GNG and CORP. Hard to understand the logic for AfD here. --
257:
950:(emphasis in original). World Patent Marketing has been the subject of such coverage; see
729:
596:
503:
441:
416:
391:
363:
276:
239:
883:
581:
459:
344:
1045:
826:
740:
Again, it has not been demonstrated that Whitaker's alleged behavior would have been
571:
527:
486:
150:
717:
785:
751:
617:
722:
589:
434:
409:
384:
356:
348:
269:
232:
917:
566:
540:
522:
309:. The following diffs support the aforementioned concerns as follows:
912:
if there's no secondary sourcing. Creizman's role was noted by the
580:
Keeping in mind, of course, that we do not conflate the company's
1057:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
343:
should be removed from our BLPs. There is no mention of WPM in
322:
when Smartse first created the article, but were later removed.
942:. Policy states unambiguously that an organization is notable
231:
as none were mentioned in the FTC action against the company.
905:
and the House Oversight Committee highlighted the connection.
268:. It's only claim to notability is non-compliant with GUILT.
902:). The FTC have a FOI page specifically on his involvement,
482:
331:
325:
319:
312:
146:
142:
138:
202:
477:
since no policy based argument is made for deletion.
406:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
216:
481:is clearly met per the references I'd included in
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1069:). No further edits should be made to this page.
431:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
429:Note: This discussion has been included in the
404:Note: This discussion has been included in the
379:Note: This discussion has been included in the
320:The high profile names were originally listed
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
381:list of People-related deletion discussions
428:
403:
378:
355:that associates the founder, Omar Rivero.
1029:intended as a backdoor route to deletion"
339:. All mention that is noncompliant with
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1033:vague waves at irrelevant policies
351:, a Republican, and no mention in
24:
288:Added reasoning to SPEEDY DELETE:
89:Introduction to deletion process
944:"if it has been the subject of
648:No evidence? Please read this
1:
920:for an equivalent situation.
256:that it unequivocally fails
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1086:
1010:of other policies. Citing
1008:context-free alphabet soup
835:18:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
817:19:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
800:03:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
766:00:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
736:00:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
708:19:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
632:03:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
603:14:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
576:05:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
553:16:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
532:00:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
512:01:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
495:12:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
468:12:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
448:12:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
423:12:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
398:12:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
370:14:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
283:12:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
246:12:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
1050:18:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
935:18:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
332:My edit to add back names
59:01:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
1059:Please do not modify it.
854:(discusses Brian Mast),
850:(discusses Brian Mast),
32:Please do not modify it.
293:, and at minimum fails
347:, there is mention in
113:World Patent Marketing
65:World Patent Marketing
878:(mentions Whitaker),
77:Articles for deletion
918:Theranos#Management
914:Wall Street Journal
586:board of directors
726:
593:
450:
438:
425:
413:
400:
388:
360:
273:
236:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
57:
1077:
940:Keep, no-brainer
932:
928:
924:
792:
758:
747:Michael Avenatti
727:
724:
720:
624:
594:
591:
439:
436:
414:
411:
389:
386:
361:
358:
353:Occupy Democrats
274:
271:
237:
234:
221:
220:
206:
154:
136:
74:
56:
34:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1067:deletion review
1017:WP:NEGATIVESPIN
999:Miami New Times
953:Washington Post
930:
926:
922:
888:Washington Post
876:Miami New Times
844:Courthouse News
786:
752:
723:
618:
590:
435:
410:
385:
357:
337:the FTC handles
307:WP:NEGATIVESPIN
270:
233:
163:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1083:
1081:
1072:
1071:
1053:
1052:
1037:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
972:New York Times
966:New York Times
937:
892:New York Times
864:Clarion Ledger
837:
819:
802:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
738:
697:
696:
695:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
582:advisory board
535:
534:
514:
497:
471:
470:
452:
451:
426:
401:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
345:Ronald Mallett
329:
326:On Nov 7, 2018
323:
317:
313:On Nov 7, 2018
291:WP:ATTACK PAGE
285:
224:
223:
160:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1082:
1070:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1028:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1012:WP:ATTACKPAGE
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
995:
994:
989:
988:
983:
979:
975:
973:
968:
967:
962:
960:
955:
954:
949:
947:
941:
938:
936:
933:
925:
919:
915:
911:
907:
904:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
838:
836:
832:
828:
823:
820:
818:
814:
810:
806:
803:
801:
798:
797:
793:
791:
790:
782:
779:
778:
767:
764:
763:
759:
757:
756:
748:
743:
742:any different
739:
737:
734:
731:
728:
715:
712:Forbes cites
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
698:
694:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
633:
630:
629:
625:
623:
622:
614:
604:
601:
598:
595:
587:
583:
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
568:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:
538:
537:
536:
533:
529:
525:
524:
518:
515:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
454:
453:
449:
446:
443:
440:
432:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
407:
402:
399:
396:
393:
390:
382:
377:
371:
368:
365:
362:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
333:
330:
327:
324:
321:
318:
314:
311:
310:
308:
304:
300:
299:WP:NOTSCANDAL
296:
292:
289:
286:
284:
281:
278:
275:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
241:
238:
230:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
55:
54:Seraphimblade
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1058:
1056:
1044:
1026:
998:
992:
987:The Guardian
986:
971:
965:
958:
952:
945:
939:
880:Sun Sentinel
839:
821:
804:
795:
788:
787:
780:
761:
754:
753:
741:
649:
627:
620:
619:
565:
521:
516:
499:
483:this version
474:
455:
303:WP:RECENTISM
287:
253:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
70:
49:
47:
31:
28:
993:Vanity Fair
809:Gandydancer
700:Gandydancer
584:with their
545:Gandydancer
475:Speedy keep
295:WP:COATRACK
190:free images
504:Goldsztajn
349:Brian Mast
262:WP:NOTNEWS
1063:talk page
978:Bloomberg
860:NBC Miami
856:NBC Miami
852:NBC Miami
652:articles:
460:Acousmana
37:talk page
1065:or in a
1046:MastCell
982:Fox News
910:WP:UNDUE
900:ABC News
872:Lexology
827:Springee
822:Draftify
781:Draftify
714:Telegram
517:Draftify
341:WP:GUILT
229:WP:GUILT
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
931:Windows
884:Reuters
848:Portico
487:SmartSE
479:WP:CORP
266:WP:10YT
196:WP refs
184:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
1041:WP:ORG
1004:WP:ORG
923:Fences
868:TCPalm
789:BD2412
755:BD2412
650:Forbes
621:BD2412
316:board.
305:, and
258:WP:ORG
254:Adding
168:Google
134:delete
974:again
961:again
927:&
896:Slate
725:Atsme
719:said.
592:Atsme
572:talk
528:talk
437:Atsme
412:Atsme
387:Atsme
359:Atsme
272:Atsme
235:Atsme
211:JSTOR
172:books
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
1035:and
1025:"is
959:WaPo
840:Keep
831:talk
813:talk
805:Keep
704:talk
549:talk
508:talk
500:Keep
491:talk
464:talk
456:Keep
264:and
204:FENS
178:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
50:keep
1027:not
567:DGG
541:DGG
523:DGG
218:TWL
155:– (
1043:.
996:,
990:,
984:,
980:,
976:,
969:,
963:,
956:,
898:,
894:,
890:,
886:,
874:,
870:,
866:,
862:,
858:,
846:,
833:)
815:)
733:📧
730:💬
706:)
600:📧
597:💬
574:)
551:)
530:)
510:)
493:)
485:.
466:)
445:📧
442:💬
433:.
420:📧
417:💬
408:.
395:📧
392:💬
383:.
367:📧
364:💬
301:,
297:,
280:📧
277:💬
260:,
243:📧
240:💬
198:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
948:"
829:(
811:(
796:T
762:T
702:(
628:T
570:(
547:(
526:(
506:(
489:(
462:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.