Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/What is black and white and red all over? - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

326:
This is an extremely old age joke question that i would support keeping if it had something about its history etc. But I doupt anyone is going to find the required info. other punch lines section is rather...
411: 402:), a collection of jokes does not make an encyclopaedia article. The cure for that is to take the serious documentation and discussion of the jokes concerned (which doesn't exist for aviation jokes), and 90: 85: 94: 77: 117: 399: 513:- excellent contrast between the before AfD and the current version's level of notability. If only all AfD's encouraged such positive editing rather than arguing. - 81: 73: 65: 188:. I just don't believe this article has any potential to be anything more than a destination for people to add their own interpretations of the joke. 517: 480: 471: 456: 444: 422: 382: 370: 352: 340: 331: 318: 296: 281: 269: 235: 219: 204: 476:
Interestingly, Chiaro points out that in translation to French one has to include exactly such a spoiler, specifing a newspaper in the question.
378:
I would suggest moving it to an article such as "List of cliched jokes" except there'd be POV/sourcing problems there, too. Just get rid of it.
215:(right now): Leaning merge with another article, which one? I am not sure, perhaps something like this only merits a line in some other entry. 176:
Failed both speedy and prod - just one cliched joke of thousands. If I had to cite a particular guideline for deletion, I guess it would be
287: 141: 136: 145: 17: 502: 260: 128: 264: 414:), this riddle has been studied in detail by both linguists and folklorists, and there is plenty to say on the subject. 493: 532: 36: 277:
into something else, it's part of our culture, it's a really old joke, belongs some where on Knowledge (XXG). --
531:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
256: 132: 232: 216: 403: 395: 307: 514: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
181: 442: 431: 294: 249: 202: 124: 245: 185: 177: 315: 306:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a joke book, and the joke is so old that is it not worth moving to
278: 394:
sourced. There is almost certainly no need even for a merger. Yes, as exemplified by
365: 453: 407: 477: 435: 419: 337: 228: 195: 162: 111: 439: 379: 349: 328: 291: 199: 311: 54: 467: 390:
How can one source something like this? In the way that the article is
186:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collector of information
525:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
438:. Hopefully this doesn't confuse the discussion too much. 430:. It looks like the article has been moved to the title 158: 154: 150: 107: 103: 99: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 535:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 227:: The new title and the relevance raised by 364:How you can source something like this? -- 194:based on the new title and references by 74:What is black and white and red all over? 66:What is black and white and red all over? 452:. Uncle G has done it again. Nice job. 190:As the nominator, I change my vote to 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 492:under new title - nice turnaround! 288:Why did the chicken cross the road? 24: 336:Brace yourself for a surprise. 1: 518:17:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 507:12:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 481:14:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 472:00:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 457:21:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 445:20:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 423:20:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 383:06:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 371:06:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 353:00:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 341:20:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 332:04:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 319:02:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 297:02:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 282:02:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 270:02:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 236:00:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 220:02:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 205:02:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 552: 348:After Uncle G's changes-- 286:Perhaps incorporate into 528:Please do not modify it. 169:(added by closing admin) 32:Please do not modify it. 406:the article. As with 461:but that title is a 268: 171: 59: 58:2007-02-27 05:55Z 543: 530: 500: 432:Newspaper riddle 368: 254: 167: 166: 148: 125:Newspaper riddle 115: 97: 61: 57: 50: 34: 551: 550: 546: 545: 544: 542: 541: 540: 539: 533:deletion review 526: 494: 366: 139: 123: 88: 72: 69: 51: 45: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 549: 547: 538: 537: 521: 520: 508: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 447: 425: 412:AfD discussion 400:AfD discussion 387: 386: 385: 373: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 321: 301: 300: 299: 290:Just an idea. 272: 240: 239: 238: 173: 172: 121: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 548: 536: 534: 529: 523: 522: 519: 516: 512: 509: 506: 505: 501: 499: 498: 491: 488: 482: 479: 475: 474: 473: 470: 469: 464: 460: 459: 458: 455: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 437: 433: 429: 426: 424: 421: 417: 413: 409: 408:Elephant joke 405: 401: 397: 396:Aviation joke 393: 389: 388: 384: 381: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367:† Ðy§ep§ion † 363: 360: 354: 351: 347: 344: 343: 342: 339: 335: 334: 333: 330: 325: 322: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 298: 295: 293: 289: 285: 284: 283: 280: 276: 273: 271: 266: 262: 258: 253: 252: 248:a joke book. 247: 244: 241: 237: 234: 230: 226: 223: 222: 221: 218: 214: 213: 209: 208: 207: 206: 203: 201: 197: 193: 189: 187: 183: 179: 170: 164: 160: 156: 152: 147: 143: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 60: 56: 48: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 527: 524: 515:WeniWidiWiki 510: 503: 496: 495: 489: 466: 463:plot spoiler 462: 449: 427: 415: 391: 375: 361: 345: 324:Weak Delete 323: 303: 274: 250: 242: 224: 211: 210: 191: 175: 174: 168: 52: 46: 43: 31: 28: 490:Strong keep 275:Incorporate 251:ObiterDicta 212:Weak Delete 279:The_stuart 233:A mcmurray 217:A mcmurray 184:) or that 308:WP:BJAODN 257:pleadings 454:Zetawoof 327:crude.-- 118:View log 478:Uncle G 465:(smile) 436:Uncle G 428:Comment 420:Uncle G 404:cleanup 338:Uncle G 304:Delete. 265:appeals 229:Uncle G 196:Uncle G 182:WP:DUMB 142:protect 137:history 91:protect 86:history 497:bd2412 440:RJASE1 380:JuJube 376:Delete 362:Delete 350:Dacium 329:Dacium 292:RJASE1 261:errata 246:WP:NOT 243:Delete 200:RJASE1 178:WP:BAI 146:delete 95:delete 312:DanMS 163:views 155:watch 151:links 112:views 104:watch 100:links 55:Quarl 16:< 511:Keep 450:Keep 416:Keep 346:KEEP 316:Talk 225:Keep 192:keep 159:logs 133:talk 129:edit 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 47:Keep 468:DGG 434:by 392:now 310:. ● 116:– ( 418:. 314:• 263:• 259:• 255:( 198:. 161:| 157:| 153:| 149:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 504:T 410:( 398:( 267:) 231:. 180:( 165:) 127:( 120:) 114:) 76:( 53:— 49:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Quarl
What is black and white and red all over?
What is black and white and red all over?
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Newspaper riddle
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
WP:BAI
WP:DUMB
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collector of information
Uncle G
RJASE1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.