550:
including me within a group comprised of myiad other individuals purportedly unable to tell the difference between a this-topic-irreverent
Hollywood film (whose associated article I have neither ever edited nor submitted for AfD) and an originally-researched Knowledge (XXG) list article unlikely to
487:
It is a reasonably-referenced article on a topic covered in multiple reliable sources. It is both notable and necessary for a modern encyclopedia. Meanwhile the nominator
Froglich reveals his/her own anti-academic bias on both the nomination and his/her comments: "the anencephalics who presently
228:
A tendentious "white people are bad"-type thesis masquerading as an article based on the work of one academic. The list-type nature has resulted in constant bickering (e.g., multiple long-running threads on the TP regarding "The Matrix") over what should be included. Noting that at least two
418:, but I conceive that there is still a sufficiency. Improve the article through removal of the contentious list, and refinement of the prose to focus on a discussion & documentation of the trope itself, including attribution of POV; rather than focusing on collating purported uses. -
463:
because they apparently feel offended by the topic (calling it the "animating spirit of anti-white racism" on the talk page). This nomination in spite of overwhelming evidence about the topic shows an attempted POV pushing just because they are squeamish about the topic.
95:
90:
197:
313:
While I do stipulate that the anencephalics who presently dictate academia have indeed awarded the indefatigably bow-tied
Matthew W. Hughey with an associate professorship in the low-rent-district of hyphenated-
85:
191:
157:
150:
123:
118:
127:
110:
431:
248:
Addendum: I note that the article has been nominated twice before. Can anyone provide a logical reason as to why they think this article is going to improve?--
266:
Regarding your addendum: both of the other discussions were clear keeps. At any rate, there's no policy that articles prone to bickering should be deleted.
295:
applies. All WikiP articles are open to editing and improvement - that happens with discussion on the talk page for the article - not by endless AFD's.
564:
537:
505:
477:
440:
422:
390:
361:
343:
329:
317:
studies, I would strenuously object to the premise that the output of a fellow whose entire career has consisted of moaning about "Hegemonic
Whiteness"
303:
277:
257:
243:
68:
212:
179:
551:
ever approach a semblance of neutrality while including its list -- could you please hold still while I smack you upside the head with a
114:
318:
17:
492:( absence of a major portion of the brain) and should be disregarded. Troubling behavior by the nominator which makes it hard to
173:
451:
because the topic is notable through coverage in multiple reliable sources. The trope has even been discussed in recent movies
414:
in individual films make up the bulk of the article's references, and do not provide significant coverage required to add to
291:. The suggestion that it is a "white people are bad" article (it is actually much more than this) leads to pointing out that
106:
74:
493:
169:
585:
40:
219:
473:
381:. As others have stated it is well referenced by reliable sources and surpasses our general notability guideline.--
357:
64:
287:
As mentioned in the previous AFD's this narrative is noted in critical and scholarly research. It clearly meets
386:
460:
378:
292:
185:
320:
in any way constitutes "critical" (in the "important" or "necessary" sense of the definition) research.--
581:
436:
36:
535:
60:
488:
dictate academia" So the concept is used in academia, but in the nominator's opinion academics have
382:
300:
205:
560:
524:
501:
325:
253:
239:
339:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
580:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
515:. The article is clearly referenced, which is what articles are based upon. Before nominator
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
272:
288:
529:
469:
353:
296:
415:
556:
518:
497:
321:
249:
235:
404:
335:
144:
489:
401:
267:
406:
et al to meet notability guidelines; though the independence of those from the
419:
528:: the article is about media representation, not about actual white people.
465:
349:
400:
There appears to be sufficient significant coverage in the works of Hughey
314:
96:
Articles for deletion/White savior narrative in film (3rd nomination)
91:
Articles for deletion/White savior narrative in film (2nd nomination)
546:
Since you felt obliged to paste my name into your fantasy-projected
574:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
555:
while reciting the
Pastafarian anthem? *Smack!* Thanks... --
522:
and their "white people are bad" notion tries to delete
232:
230:
140:
136:
132:
234:
likewise think it ought to be heaved, I'm nominating.
204:
86:
Articles for deletion/White savior narrative in film
218:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
588:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:Well, there's the real agenda for this AfD. --
410:could be questioned. Passing mentions of the
8:
430:Note: This debate has been included in the
429:
432:list of Film-related deletion discussions
83:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
81:
24:
377:this nomination just reeks of
107:White savior narrative in film
75:White savior narrative in film
1:
565:07:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
538:07:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
506:07:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
478:12:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
441:03:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
423:02:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
391:21:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
362:12:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
344:23:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
330:22:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
304:21:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
278:21:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
258:21:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
244:21:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
69:21:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
605:
577:Please do not modify it.
496:for his/her nomination.
32:Please do not modify it.
459:. The nominator simply
80:AfDs for this article:
348:Indeed, there it is.
453:The Legend of Tarzan
312:<dry sarcasm: -->
457:Free State of Jones
408:theory of the trope
553:salmo trutta fario
525:American History X
494:assume good faith
443:
59:
56:non-admin closure
596:
579:
532:
521:
461:does not like it
439:
398:Keep and improve
223:
222:
208:
160:
148:
130:
53:
34:
604:
603:
599:
598:
597:
595:
594:
593:
592:
586:deletion review
575:
530:
516:
435:
276:
165:
156:
121:
105:
102:
100:
78:
61:DavidLeighEllis
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
602:
600:
591:
590:
570:
569:
568:
567:
541:
540:
509:
508:
481:
480:
445:
444:
426:
425:
394:
393:
383:TriiipleThreat
379:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
307:
306:
293:WP:NOTCENSORED
281:
280:
270:
226:
225:
162:
101:
99:
98:
93:
88:
82:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
601:
589:
587:
583:
578:
572:
571:
566:
562:
558:
554:
549:
545:
544:
543:
542:
539:
536:
533:
527:
526:
520:
514:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
486:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
446:
442:
438:
437:North America
433:
428:
427:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
399:
396:
395:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
372:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:
279:
274:
269:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
231:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
171:
168:
167:Find sources:
163:
159:
155:
152:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
576:
573:
552:
548:non sequitur
547:
523:
512:
484:
456:
452:
448:
411:
407:
397:
375:Speedy keep:
374:
284:
263:
247:
227:
215:
209:
201:
194:
188:
182:
176:
166:
153:
49:
47:
31:
28:
490:anencephaly
192:free images
531:soetermans
416:notability
582:talk page
403:, Schultz
297:MarnetteD
37:talk page
584:or in a
557:Froglich
519:Froglich
498:Dimadick
322:Froglich
250:Froglich
236:Froglich
151:View log
39:or in a
474:contrib
358:contrib
336:Drmargi
264:Comment
198:WP refs
186:scholar
124:protect
119:history
315:weeble
289:WP:GNG
268:clpo13
229:others
170:Google
128:delete
420:Ryk72
412:trope
213:JSTOR
174:books
158:Stats
145:views
137:watch
133:links
16:<
561:talk
513:Keep
502:talk
485:Keep
470:talk
466:Erik
455:and
449:Keep
387:talk
354:talk
350:Erik
340:talk
326:talk
301:Talk
285:Keep
273:talk
254:talk
240:talk
206:FENS
180:news
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
65:talk
50:keep
476:)
360:)
220:TWL
149:– (
52:.
563:)
534:.
504:)
472:|
434:.
389:)
356:|
342:)
328:)
256:)
242:)
200:)
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
67:)
559:(
517:@
500:(
468:(
385:(
352:(
338:(
324:(
299:|
275:)
271:(
252:(
238:(
224:)
216:·
210:·
202:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
172:(
164:(
161:)
154:·
147:)
109:(
63:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.