313:; I would argue that the only three references from reliable sources that count as vaguely notable are the first two New York Times ones and the Salon one, all of which are relatively brief and could be argued to not constitute significant coverage on their own; the second New York Times reference is about a play based on the website and makes only brief (about two paragraphs) reference to the site itself. The CNN reference is both mildly questionable in its status as a secondary source (it's an interview with the site's owner during an episode of a talk show, which I would consider to be a questionably independent source) and highly questionable in its notability (said talk show, while notable enough for its own page, is so obscure it doesn't even show up in the CNN Original Programming template), and the Washington Post reference is a dead link. I cannot find much else coverage of the site in the Find sources for Google News. Therefore, I would argue that it does not pass
461:
Wooden's parody is a mirror distortion of the real White House's web site. Whitehouse.org is complete with clickable links to things like the
Department of Faith, Homeland Security, and Fraternal Affairs. ... Back at Whitehouse.org, the main page also offers Onionesque press releases, including:
426:
As with all effective satire, Whitehouse.org is impolite, perhaps even a tough vulgar. Fans of the
Republican administration will likely be put off by the harsh tenor of much of the site's "news" articles. But if you believe that the purpose of the popular press is to comfort the afflicted and
247:, with that one event being the conflict with Cheney's office. Outside of this one event, every last reference is either from the site itself (a primary source if there ever was one), or non-notable sources that, in some cases, would provide a "reference" for any website (like WHOIS).
338:
Knowledge is supposed to be based on 3rd party sources, and for a long running website if there is really only one event that ever got quality coverage, we should not have an article on the website. The event itself does not seem to rise to being
283:
has no application here. 1E applies to "individuals" notable for a single event. This AfD concerns a web site (not an individual) ... and one that has been operating for more than 20 years. The notability of the web site should be assessed under
208:
457:
Shortly after Bush was "appointed" by the
Supreme Court, John Wooden thought Bush's new White House would be "super-meaty project." All he needed was a name, and the whitehouse.org web domain just happened to be
419:
WhiteHouse.org is a satirical site—an acid-tongued spin on
President George W. Bush and his administration. When you realize your mistake, you may be tempted to exit the page and head to the
509:
Mr. Wooden, of
Brooklyn, said he has operated the site since 2001, and no one in the Bush administration had complained before the letter from Mr. Cheney's counsel, David S. Addington.
169:
469:
202:
262:
427:
afflict the comfortable (the creed of many professional journalists), you'll realize how firmly this site is rooted in the
American tradition of muckraking.
116:
101:
462:"President's Armed Forces Radio Address to America's Troops on the Glorious Occasion of their Retroactive Induction into Eternal Martial Slavery" ...
547:
376:
423:
White House Web site (www.whitehouse.gov). But if you flee, you'll be missing one of the best examples of biting, incisive satire on the Web.
401:
142:
137:
146:
479:
628:
129:
96:
89:
17:
223:
190:
559:
415:
The book provides five pages of coverage about
Whitehouse.org. The book notes in the "Overview" section of the chapter:
110:
106:
66:
555:
650:
344:
40:
184:
309:, you have a good point. However, I fail to see how most of the coverage from mainstream media sources passes
325:
251:
633:
609:
592:
572:
365:
348:
328:
301:
271:
254:
180:
71:
605:
506:
The site is meant to be a parody of the actual White House Web site (www.whitehouse.gov), Mr. Wooden said.
496:
The site (www.whitehouse.org) lampoons senior members of the administration, from the president on down.
646:
36:
322:
248:
230:
624:
551:
340:
216:
133:
243:
comedy site which got some sparse coverage from notable media sources. At best, this is a case of
564:
474:
601:
439:
398:
394:
384:
361:
314:
310:
289:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
645:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
434:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
568:
390:
Consider the Source: A Critical Guide to 100 Prominent News and
Information Sites on the Web
196:
620:
588:
297:
62:
600:. Really good research and documentation by Cunard above makes a convincing case to me.--
266:
240:
125:
77:
318:
285:
514:
357:
280:
244:
163:
388:
584:
306:
293:
53:
517:
from the website's creator provides a list of media quotes about the website:
541:“The jury is out on Wooden’s ability to make anyone laugh.” – New York Post
583:. Passes GNG and prong 1 of WEBCRIT per sourcing proffered by Cunard.
641:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
435:"Lampooning the Buffoon: fun on the internet at W's expense"
538:“Offensive, irreverent… bitingly funny.” – Orlando Sentinel
470:"Web Site Hears From Cheney After Parody Involving Wife"
159:
155:
151:
215:
375:
per the significant coverage in multiple independent
617:: Per Cunard's findings, I think this passes GNG.
552:Knowledge:Notability#General notability guideline
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
653:). No further edits should be made to this page.
535:“Scathing… Wickedly funny” – Detroit Metro Times
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
502:Courage. Passion. Faith. Petroleum. Xenophobia.
383:Broderick, James F.; Miller, Darren W. (2007).
279:No view on the notability of the web site, but
263:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
529:“Hysterical… Searing political parody” – CNN
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
356:. Barely notable and only sometimes funny.
554:, which requires "significant coverage in
433:Ristow, Richard (September–October 2004).
260:
7:
24:
550:to allow Whitehouse.org to pass
546:There is sufficient coverage in
520:“Hilarious” – The New York Times
102:Introduction to deletion process
532:“Brilliantly ham-fisted” – TIME
468:Weiser, Benjamin (2003-03-06).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
317:, and rather or not it passes
1:
610:21:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
593:16:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
573:10:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
366:21:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
349:14:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
329:02:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
302:22:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
272:22:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
255:21:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
634:02:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
385:"Chapter 97: WhiteHouse.org"
72:16:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
670:
643:Please do not modify it.
498:The Bush Administration,
32:Please do not modify it.
393:. Medford, New Jersey:
511:
464:
429:
500:it says on one page.
494:
455:
417:
90:Articles for deletion
492:The article notes:
453:The article notes:
523:“In” – Vanity Fair
475:The New York Times
403:978-0-910965-77-4
395:Information Today
341:John Pack Lambert
288:and perhaps also
274:
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
661:
632:
562:of the subject".
556:reliable sources
548:reliable sources
490:
488:
487:
478:. Archived from
451:
449:
448:
413:
411:
410:
377:reliable sources
269:
234:
233:
219:
167:
149:
87:
58:
34:
669:
668:
664:
663:
662:
660:
659:
658:
657:
651:deletion review
618:
526:“Spot on” – BBC
485:
483:
467:
446:
444:
432:
408:
406:
404:
397:. pp. 419–422.
382:
267:
176:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
70:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
667:
665:
656:
655:
637:
636:
612:
595:
577:
576:
545:
544:
543:
542:
539:
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
521:
512:
465:
430:
402:
369:
368:
351:
333:
332:
331:
323:HAWTH OFF HEAD
321:is debatable.
276:
275:
249:HAWTH OFF HEAD
237:
236:
173:
126:Whitehouse.org
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
78:Whitehouse.org
75:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
666:
654:
652:
648:
644:
639:
638:
635:
630:
626:
622:
616:
613:
611:
607:
603:
599:
596:
594:
590:
586:
582:
579:
578:
575:
574:
570:
566:
561:
557:
553:
549:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
525:
522:
519:
518:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
503:
499:
493:
482:on 2020-11-29
481:
477:
476:
471:
466:
463:
459:
454:
442:
441:
436:
431:
428:
424:
422:
416:
405:
400:
396:
392:
391:
386:
381:
380:
378:
374:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
346:
342:
337:
334:
330:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
278:
277:
273:
270:
264:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
642:
640:
614:
602:Concertmusic
597:
580:
563:
515:This website
508:
505:
501:
497:
495:
491:
484:. Retrieved
480:the original
473:
460:
456:
452:
445:. Retrieved
438:
425:
420:
418:
414:
407:. Retrieved
389:
372:
353:
335:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
83:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
560:independent
239:Run-of-the-
203:free images
67:revolutions
621:Javert2113
486:2020-11-29
447:2020-11-29
409:2020-11-29
315:WP:WEBCRIT
311:WP:WEBCRIT
290:WP:WEBCRIT
647:talk page
558:that are
268:Spiderone
37:talk page
649:or in a
339:notable.
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
625:Siarad.
443:. p. 21
358:Bearian
241:WP:MILL
209:WPÂ refs
197:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
63:spin me
565:Cunard
440:Clamor
336:Delete
319:WP:GNG
286:WP:GNG
181:Google
147:delete
585:Cbl62
458:free.
307:Cbl62
294:Cbl62
281:WP:1E
245:WP:1E
224:JSTOR
185:books
164:views
156:watch
152:links
56:78.26
16:<
615:Keep
606:talk
598:Keep
589:talk
581:Keep
569:talk
421:real
399:ISBN
373:Keep
362:talk
345:talk
326:TALK
298:talk
252:TALK
217:FENS
191:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
50:keep
354:Meh
231:TWL
168:– (
619:—
608:)
591:)
571:)
472:.
437:.
387:.
364:)
347:)
300:)
292:.
265:.
211:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
65:/
52:.
631:)
629:¤
627:|
623:(
604:(
587:(
567:(
489:.
450:.
412:.
379:.
360:(
343:(
296:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
69:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.