281:. We should judge this as any other book on a non-WP subject. I doubt that standard book reviews as Travb/Inclusionist mentions above are sufficient for notability. With regards to this article, it smells of self promotion (though I have no information to back that up) and am unconvinced we can say something sufficiently encyclopedic about it beyond what would be in standard publishers' blurbs and standard reviews. However, my "nose" for notability may be off and I am happy to be overruled if there is a corpus of other books on other topics that are not notable beyond being reviewed, or if there is truly something special about this book.
139:
One of an enormous series of how-to guides all of which are functionally indistinguishable from each other, and from the comparable guides offered by rival publications. By a curious coincidence the only article I can find on any of this series is the one which is self-referential. At best this
352:
acknowledging that the article subject is notable, 2) arguing that the
Arkansas Democrat Gazette, and New York Times Review of Books is not a verifiable or reliable source, which is ridiculous, 3) arguing that these two sources are not enough, and even though
516:
adequate coverage. We probably should include more of the titles in this series, if it comes to that, but --not unreasonably--this one has had an unusual amount of press notice. The NYT review by itself would have been sufficient.
333:
Show me significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Then we can presume it is notable. After a presumption is established, I'll look and see if it is actually notable.
200:
177:
technology columnist. I question how much the nominator actually searched for sources before nominating this article up for deletion, a two minute search on my own found this:
132:
576:..has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience.
208:
99:
94:
103:
86:
357:
only mentions "multiple sources" and doesn't define the number of sources required for inclusion, demanding more than 2 sources, or 4) A stricter interpretation
578:
The current article is very short. I hope that someone will have time to expand the article, based on what the published sources have written.
90:
211:
all mention or review the book. Which means the book far surpasses any notability or verifiability hurdles for inclusion on
Knowledge.
604:
587:
562:
545:
528:
508:
493:
476:
435:
406:
388:
374:
343:
328:
310:
290:
267:
249:
220:
153:
68:
17:
162:
82:
74:
178:
234:
348:
I think User:MuZemike said it best below. There are four routes you can take, from least likely to most likely: 1) a
619:
188:
184:
36:
618:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
541:
431:
394:
384:
339:
306:
196:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
140:
should be merged to a "help for editors" section as part of a list of all available
Knowledge how-to guides.
506:
402:
370:
324:
245:
216:
427:
203:
460:
398:
366:
320:
241:
212:
238:
206:
583:
489:
362:
358:
354:
463:
mentions provide no in-depth review of the book. With that said, this weakly passes for notability.
537:
380:
335:
302:
502:
470:
192:
286:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
558:
63:
600:
579:
485:
166:
365:
requires, arguing that the
Arkansas Democrat Gazette coverage of the book is not enough.
230:
174:
524:
464:
456:
262:
256:
148:
142:
571:
282:
120:
554:
170:
52:
596:
448:
165:
is one of the most well known guides to
Knowledge, published by the respected
501:
Per Travb and MuZemike. There's plenty of independent coverage available. -
349:
519:
484:
Per Travb (who said it best and first). Notability is not an issue here.
181:
451:
provides some additional independent coverage, barely satisfying the
183:(which was already on the page when it was nominated for deletion)
612:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:. I was not expecting this response in a million years :)
536:
Being part of a large series is not a reason to delete.
127:
116:
112:
108:
209:
Knowledge:Knowledge
Signpost/2008-03-03/Book review
553:. Reviews and other coverage more than adequate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
622:). No further edits should be made to this page.
254:s/sources/namechecks/, in at least some cases.
8:
279:Tentative delete, and certainly not speedy
443:— The NYT review definitely provides
7:
24:
459:. However, the other ones that
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
570:Satisfies the first clause of
163:Knowledge - The Missing Manual
83:Knowledge - The Missing Manual
75:Knowledge - The Missing Manual
1:
605:22:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
588:18:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
563:10:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
546:14:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
529:06:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
509:00:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
494:22:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
477:22:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
436:21:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
407:05:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
389:04:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
375:04:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
344:22:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
329:22:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
311:21:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
291:21:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
268:14:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
250:04:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
221:20:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
154:20:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
69:03:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
447:coverage of the book, while
179:The New York Review of Books
379:Ok, you have convinced me.
639:
595:per EdJohnston and travb.
453:multiple reliable sources
449:Arkansas Democrat Gazette
205:, Computers in Libraries,
189:Arkansas Democrat Gazette
185:Reed Business Information
615:Please do not modify it.
319:Can you please explain?
197:Fort Worth Star-Telegram
32:Please do not modify it.
167:O'Reilly Media Learning
393:Man that deserves a
235:Nature magazine blog
193:News & Observer
239:Guardian newspaper
44:The result was
266:
231:Publishers weekly
202:SciTech Book News
152:
59:
630:
617:
473:
467:
260:
146:
130:
124:
106:
62:
57:
55:
49:
34:
638:
637:
633:
632:
631:
629:
628:
627:
626:
620:deletion review
613:
471:
465:
428:CretinInsiduous
126:
97:
81:
78:
60:
53:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
636:
634:
625:
624:
608:
607:
590:
565:
548:
538:Colonel Warden
531:
511:
496:
479:
438:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
381:NonvocalScream
336:NonvocalScream
314:
313:
303:NonvocalScream
293:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
229:More sources:
224:
223:
175:New York Times
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
635:
623:
621:
616:
610:
609:
606:
602:
598:
594:
591:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
564:
560:
556:
552:
549:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
530:
526:
522:
521:
515:
512:
510:
507:
504:
500:
497:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
468:
462:
458:
455:tenet of the
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
437:
433:
429:
425:
422:
421:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:WP:Notability
360:
359:WP:Notability
356:
355:WP:Notability
351:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
298:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
269:
264:
259:
258:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:
226:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
180:
176:
172:
169:, written by
168:
164:
161:
158:
157:
156:
155:
150:
145:
144:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
66:
58:
56:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
614:
611:
592:
575:
567:
550:
533:
518:
513:
498:
481:
461:Inclusionist
452:
444:
440:
426:per Travb.--
423:
301:Notability.
296:
295:
278:
255:
159:
141:
138:
64:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
445:significant
171:David Pogue
580:EdJohnston
486:Ecoleetage
65:discussion
441:Weak keep
424:Weak keep
361:than the
350:mea culpa
466:MuZemike
395:barnstar
133:View log
283:Martinp
100:protect
95:history
555:JulesH
297:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
54:Aitias
597:Cbl62
572:WP:BK
568:Keep.
399:travb
367:travb
321:travb
263:Help!
242:travb
213:travb
149:Help!
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
601:talk
593:Keep
584:talk
559:talk
551:Keep
542:talk
534:Keep
525:talk
514:Keep
499:Keep
490:talk
482:Keep
472:talk
432:talk
403:talk
385:talk
371:talk
340:talk
325:talk
307:talk
299:Keep
287:talk
246:talk
217:talk
160:Keep
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
48:. —
46:keep
520:DGG
503:Mgm
457:GNG
257:Guy
143:Guy
603:)
586:)
574:,
561:)
544:)
527:)
492:)
475:)
434:)
405:)
387:)
373:)
342:)
327:)
309:)
289:)
248:)
237:,
233:,
219:)
195:,
191:,
187:,
173:,
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
61://
599:(
582:(
557:(
540:(
523:(
505:|
488:(
469:(
430:(
401:(
383:(
369:(
338:(
323:(
305:(
285:(
265:)
261:(
244:(
215:(
199:,
151:)
147:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.