354:, but open to convincing. I've thought about nominating this before, but that Age article - which is definitely in-depth - always gave me pause. But then I was surprised by how little else there was in the way of serious coverage, so I'm inclined to think this is a straightforward case after all. The MCC business provoked a bit of coverage but there's really not much else that I saw. I would like to see the sources
56:, it's not useful in a deletion discussion to assert that sources exist, but not cite any of them. Given that you didn't provide any specific sources, I was forced to discount your argument. If you think you can find sources (and are willing to commit to doing the work), let me know and I'll restore this to draft space for you to work on. --
380:
I suspect from what you have written that we are looking at the same material. Yes there are not many sources which by themselves standalone as indepth material in their own right, but I felt the lesser material when accumulated was sufficient to keep the article and indeed add to it in some areas.
299:
but not (only) as a (as yet unsuccessful) politician. I was surprised about how much independent general referencing about the subject there is. This person has a finger in many pies (multiple different events) and gets more than just mentions for them. There is sufficient
208:
256:
161:
276:
202:
108:
93:
248:
168:
317:
288:
268:
134:
129:
88:
81:
17:
138:
223:
244:
190:
121:
102:
98:
401:
326:
460:
40:
239:
Non-notable multiple-time failed political candidate. Very surprised the article has lasted as long as it has.
308:, even if likely to fail any specific NSUBJECT. There is readily available material to add to the article.
240:
184:
284:
456:
439:
412:
362:
mentioned above - I didn't find much that was useful, but perhaps I wasn't looking in the right places.
180:
36:
443:
416:
390:
371:
344:
63:
340:
230:
216:
280:
264:
60:
367:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
455:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
435:
427:
386:
313:
301:
125:
336:
196:
431:
305:
260:
57:
363:
155:
382:
357:
309:
117:
69:
53:
381:
There is certainly a lot more material than many other articles rely on.
451:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
404:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
329:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
151:
147:
143:
215:
410:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
335:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
257:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
274:
254:
434:; significant RS coverage not found.
7:
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
444:02:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
64:15:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
417:10:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
391:11:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
372:11:14, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
345:16:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
318:12:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
289:12:08, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
269:01:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
249:23:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
480:
453:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
419:
347:
291:
271:
241:The Drover's Wife
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
471:
426:: does not meet
415:
409:
407:
405:
361:
334:
332:
330:
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
79:
34:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
469:
468:
467:
461:deletion review
420:
411:
400:
398:
355:
348:
325:
323:
176:
167:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
477:
475:
466:
465:
447:
446:
408:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
375:
374:
337:Dom from Paris
333:
322:
321:
320:
293:
292:
272:
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
476:
464:
462:
458:
454:
449:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
422:
421:
418:
414:
413:North America
406:
403:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
377:
376:
373:
369:
365:
359:
353:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
331:
328:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:Coolabahapple
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
452:
450:
423:
399:
351:
324:
296:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
436:K.e.coffman
304:to satisfy
203:free images
118:Will Fowles
70:Will Fowles
54:User:Aoziwe
52:. Note to
457:talk page
428:WP:ANYBIO
302:WP:NEXIST
37:talk page
459:or in a
402:Relisted
327:Relisted
261:KCVelaga
162:View log
103:glossary
58:RoySmith
39:or in a
432:WP:NPOL
364:Frickeg
209:WP refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
424:Delete
383:Aoziwe
358:Aoziwe
352:Delete
310:Aoziwe
306:WP:GNG
181:Google
139:delete
61:(talk)
50:delete
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
440:talk
387:talk
368:talk
341:talk
314:talk
297:Keep
285:talk
265:talk
245:talk
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
231:TWL
160:– (
442:)
430:/
389:)
370:)
343:)
316:)
287:)
279:.
267:)
259:.
247:)
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
438:(
385:(
366:(
360::
356:@
339:(
312:(
283:(
263:(
243:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.