Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/William Jones (game designer) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

353:
Because there's no deadline? I have come across many unsourced or barely sourced articles that have sat neglected for years and found sources for them. Many users are not patient enough to allow for that to happen, which is a shame, but I do what I can where I can. That's more than enough purpose; if
248:. The only sources we have are a chapter the subject authored and a passing mention in his publisher's entry in the list of exhibitors for a book trade show. Google doesn't seem to be of much more help in finding sources, certainly nothing that would qualify as "significant coverage in 554:
that would allow it to pass GNG. No criteria for inherent notability for game designers. Per our SOP, a high level of caution is to be used when userifying BLPs and the breadth of article and sourcing is so light that nothing meaningful will be lost by its deletion.
499:
on the basis of the anthologies he has edited, if nothing else, but I am not prepared to find additional sources or fix the article at the moment. Userification would be appropriate. As far as the IP question is concerned, any "obscure author selected at random from
573:
In case you hadn't noticed, Chetsford, the subject was an author and editor of fiction, so CREATIVE applies even if one were to grant your FRINGE view that CREATIVE does not somehow apply to game designers. Your !vote is therefore clearly not compliant with policy.
278:. I hadn't noticed the IP's request to AFD the article; I saw an AFD template on the article but no discussion, so I userfied it in order to work on it later. If that would be an acceptable compromise, this can go back to my userspace without needing to be deleted. 213: 402: 207: 443:, or move to user space if so desired. Based on existing sources, it seems like the subject has written content for some pen and paper RPG projects that are barely notable in themselves. 368:
I guess I'm just trying to understand – is there something about the subject that leads you to believe he might be notable more than, say, any obscure author selected at random from
339:
of the subject", but if you want search further, by all means do so. That being said, if there are not sources that meet those criteria, what would be the purpose of userfication?
166: 303:
Assuming that sources aren't found over the course of the week, then, am I correct in understanding that you would support userfying the article rather than keeping it?
139: 134: 421: 143: 126: 173: 98: 113: 228: 504:" will indeed meet NAUTHOR so long as their work has met with multiple critical comments. It isn't necessary to be "well-known" to be notable. 195: 377: 340: 304: 257: 130: 93: 86: 17: 189: 336: 253: 615: 597: 583: 564: 540: 513: 481: 454: 432: 413: 385: 363: 348: 326: 312: 287: 265: 68: 185: 107: 103: 122: 74: 522: 463: 332: 249: 235: 638: 40: 201: 381: 344: 308: 261: 611: 579: 509: 634: 36: 603: 496: 536: 477: 593: 560: 221: 551: 53: 607: 575: 505: 425: 406: 82: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
633:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
245: 533: 474: 354:
you don't get where I'm coming from then I don't see a point in further discussing this.
589: 556: 59: 447: 359: 322: 283: 602:
You disagree that people who write and publish conventional fiction are covered by
373: 160: 501: 369: 355: 318: 298: 279: 331:
I would be surprised if one could find "significant coverage in
629:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
525:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
466:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
403:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
56:. No new sources have been added since the AfD started. 156: 152: 148: 220: 531:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 472:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 234: 52:. Can be userfied (by somebody other than me) via 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 641:). No further edits should be made to this page. 420:Note: This discussion has been included in the 401:Note: This discussion has been included in the 372:(excluding those who have only published with 8: 422:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 419: 400: 244:Contested PROD. Clearly doesn't meet 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 274:if sources can be found, otherwise 24: 606:?? What colour is the sky, then? 99:Introduction to deletion process 1: 495:- I suspect that Jones meets 123:William Jones (game designer) 75:William Jones (game designer) 69:09:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC) 616:12:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 598:06:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 584:05:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC) 565:08:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC) 541:11:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC) 514:15:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC) 482:09:24, 24 October 2018 (UTC) 455:20:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 433:04:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 414:04:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 386:05:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 364:05:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 349:05:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 327:05:03, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 313:04:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 288:04:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 266:04:07, 17 October 2018 (UTC) 89:(AfD)? Read these primers! 658: 631:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 87:Articles for deletion 588:I disagree. Thanks. 317:That's fair enough. 543: 484: 435: 416: 256:of the subject". 104:Guide to deletion 94:How to contribute 67: 649: 530: 528: 526: 471: 469: 467: 430: 411: 333:reliable sources 302: 250:reliable sources 239: 238: 224: 176: 164: 146: 84: 66: 64: 57: 34: 657: 656: 652: 651: 650: 648: 647: 646: 645: 639:deletion review 544: 521: 519: 485: 462: 460: 446: 426: 407: 376:and the like)? 296: 181: 172: 137: 121: 118: 81: 78: 60: 58: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 655: 653: 644: 643: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 568: 567: 529: 518: 517: 516: 470: 459: 458: 457: 444: 437: 436: 417: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 374:vanity presses 291: 290: 242: 241: 178: 117: 116: 111: 101: 96: 79: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 654: 642: 640: 636: 632: 627: 626: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 595: 591: 587: 586: 585: 581: 577: 572: 571: 570: 569: 566: 562: 558: 553: 549: 546: 545: 542: 539: 538: 535: 527: 524: 515: 511: 507: 503: 498: 494: 490: 487: 486: 483: 480: 479: 476: 468: 465: 456: 453: 452: 451: 442: 439: 438: 434: 431: 429: 423: 418: 415: 412: 410: 404: 399: 387: 383: 379: 378:142.160.89.97 375: 371: 367: 366: 365: 361: 357: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 341:142.160.89.97 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 305:142.160.89.97 300: 295: 294: 293: 292: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 259: 258:142.160.89.97 255: 251: 247: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 187: 184: 183:Find sources: 179: 175: 171: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 90: 88: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 65: 63: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 630: 628: 608:Newimpartial 576:Newimpartial 547: 532: 520: 506:Newimpartial 492: 488: 473: 461: 449: 448: 440: 428:CAPTAIN RAJU 427: 409:CAPTAIN RAJU 408: 275: 271: 243: 231: 225: 217: 210: 204: 198: 192: 182: 169: 80: 61: 49: 47: 31: 28: 604:WP:CREATIVE 497:WP:CREATIVE 337:independent 254:independent 208:free images 550:BLP lacks 62:Sandstein 635:talk page 590:Chetsford 557:Chetsford 552:WP:SIGCOV 335:that are 252:that are 54:WP:REFUND 37:talk page 637:or in a 523:Relisted 502:WorldCat 464:Relisted 450:Rosguill 445:signed, 370:WorldCat 167:View log 108:glossary 39:or in a 493:Userify 214:WP refs 202:scholar 140:protect 135:history 85:New to 548:Delete 537:Sailor 478:Sailor 441:Delete 276:Userfy 246:WP:GNG 186:Google 144:delete 50:delete 229:JSTOR 190:books 174:Stats 161:views 153:watch 149:links 16:< 612:talk 594:talk 580:talk 561:talk 510:talk 489:Keep 382:talk 360:talk 345:talk 323:talk 309:talk 284:talk 272:Keep 262:talk 222:FENS 196:news 157:logs 131:talk 127:edit 534:Sam 491:or 475:Sam 356:BOZ 319:BOZ 299:BOZ 280:BOZ 236:TWL 165:– ( 614:) 596:) 582:) 563:) 512:) 424:. 405:. 384:) 362:) 347:) 325:) 311:) 286:) 264:) 216:) 159:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 142:| 138:| 133:| 129:| 610:( 592:( 578:( 559:( 508:( 380:( 358:( 343:( 321:( 307:( 301:: 297:@ 282:( 260:( 240:) 232:· 226:· 218:· 211:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 188:( 180:( 177:) 170:· 163:) 125:( 110:) 106:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
WP:REFUND
Sandstein
09:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
William Jones (game designer)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
William Jones (game designer)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.