464:, respectively). With this in view, the original complaints against this article (that there are (a) 'almost no third party sources', and (b) that the third party source referenced merely 'indiscriminately' covers 'everything he wrote') must surely now be rejected. Objection (a) is no longer true and objection (b) is debatable at best -- scholarly works that attempt to account for an author's body of work are not 'indiscriminate', but are undertaken based on the generally accepted premise that both the author and his work are considered worthy of such research. This last point is strengthened by the status of the publishing houses that have chosen to publish the works cited, because well-respected publishing houses do not publish literary criticism on authors and works of low importance.
452:, for the same reasons given above. I also wish to note that the article now cites three independent works, two scholarly and one popular: Dale Brown's authoritative and comprehensive study of Buechner's work, The Book of Buechner (2006); Marjorie Casebier McCoy's scholarly and selective study of a number of Buechner's works up to 1987, Frederick Buechner: Novelist and Theologian of the Lost and Found (1988); and Jeffrey Munroe's popular study of Buechner's works, Reading Buechner: Exploring the Work of a Master Memoirist, Novelist, Theologian, and Preacher (2019). It should also be noted that all of these works were published by respectable presses (
374:
418:, but also not a clear fail. Has been the subject of multiple published works (Criteria #1) but most might not be independent or reliable enough. And it's unclear if the author meets Criteria #5. Interesting that this trilogy is not mentioned on the author's article. Should be condensed and moved to that article, but allow someone to recreate this article if it more clearly meets WP:NBOOK.
299:
caught readers' eyes, rather than wholesale engagement with the work as separate from his other work. I also gather that it is one of a set of works which address common themes. I don't think deletion is in order, if only so people are aware that it isn't a dictionary or glossary, but it seems to me better treated in the fairly abbreviated section on his nonfiction.
298:
back to a section on the author's works. Buechner, having been both prolific and acclaimed, has lots of references to passages in his books, and this one is no exception. That said, in looking through some of those, it's pretty clear that this is a lesser work where there are a few passages that
338:
who writes "The same stylistic power, subtlety and originality that have distinguished his novels, from “A Long Day's Dying” (1950) to “Open Heart” (1972), lift “Wishful
Thinking” far above commonplace religion books nearly to the level of
202:
196:
136:
131:
140:
163:
123:
275:
369:
110:
95:
347:
An artist is at work here in the vineyard of theology, an able aphorist with a natural gift for gnomics, a wit with wisdom." - reinforces point 5:)),
217:
127:
184:
386:
469:
354:
233:
almost no third party sources, except a book that covers indiscriminately everything he wrote. No evidence of an particular importance.
119:
71:
473:
444:
427:
398:
308:
287:
266:
244:
178:
65:
174:
465:
411:
382:
90:
83:
17:
224:
453:
331:
104:
100:
190:
320:, first up, Buechner is historically significant in the field of theology so point no. 5 is met, apart from this,
490:
40:
440:
423:
394:
486:
344:
36:
436:
419:
283:
210:
461:
407:
390:
326:
61:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
485:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
304:
415:
317:
53:
457:
279:
359:
335:
254:
240:
57:
157:
300:
435:, for the reasons of those who want to keep this article that are given above.
324:
has been the subject of multiple reviews, a quick gsearch brings up reviews in
364:
340:
253:
Needs more citations for verification and that dictionary is not well known. –
235:
349:
481:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
332:"Mere Christianity’ Wishful Thinking A Theological ABC."
153:
149:
145:
209:
52:. We're going to keep for now. Feel free to discuss
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
493:). No further edits should be made to this page.
274:Note: This discussion has been included in the
276:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
223:
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
377:, a couple of dissertations that reference
273:
56:on the on the appropriate talk page(s).
7:
120:Wishful Thinking: a theological ABC
72:Wishful Thinking: a theological ABC
414:article. It's not a clear pass of
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
412:Frederick Buechner bibliography
410:or include more details on the
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
474:14:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
445:21:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
428:22:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
399:12:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
309:23:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
288:20:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
267:20:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
245:20:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
66:04:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
454:Westminster John Knox Press
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
510:
466:InklingScholarWycliffeHall
483:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
365:subscription required
84:Articles for deletion
345:“Screwtape Letters.”
462:InterVarsity Press
408:Frederick Buechner
327:The New York Times
290:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
501:
406:to a section on
379:Wishful Thinking
355:star review here
322:Wishful Thinking
264:
259:
228:
227:
213:
161:
143:
81:
34:
509:
508:
504:
503:
502:
500:
499:
498:
497:
491:deletion review
260:
255:
170:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
507:
505:
496:
495:
477:
476:
458:Harper and Row
447:
437:Davidgoodheart
430:
420:Sneakerheadguy
401:
311:
292:
291:
270:
269:
231:
230:
167:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
506:
494:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:Keep or Merge
402:
400:
396:
392:
391:Coolabahapple
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
366:
362:
361:
360:CrossCurrents
356:
352:
351:
346:
342:
337:
336:Edmund Fuller
333:
329:
328:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
297:
296:leaning merge
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
272:
271:
268:
265:
263:
258:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
237:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
482:
480:
449:
432:
403:
378:
368:
358:
348:
325:
321:
313:
295:
261:
256:
250:
234:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
334:(review by
251:Weak delete
197:free images
341:C.S. Lewis
487:talk page
280:Shellwood
37:talk page
489:or in a
416:WP:NBOOK
318:WP:NBOOK
316:, meets
164:View log
105:glossary
58:Missvain
54:WP:MERGE
39:or in a
203:WPÂ refs
191:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
460:, and
385:, and
370:Choice
350:kirkus
301:Mangoe
257:Cupper
175:Google
141:delete
241:talk
218:JSTOR
179:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
470:talk
450:Keep
441:talk
433:Keep
424:talk
395:talk
387:here
383:here
375:here
314:Keep
305:talk
284:talk
211:FENS
185:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
62:talk
50:keep
389:.
343:'s
236:DGG
225:TWL
162:– (
472:)
456:,
443:)
426:)
397:)
381:-
373:-
367:,
363:-
357:,
353:-
330:-
307:)
286:)
278:.
262:52
243:)
205:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
64:)
468:(
439:(
422:(
393:(
303:(
282:(
239:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.