Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Wren Kitchens - Knowledge

Source 📝

249:
It is currently locked and has been for awhile due to the editing by what appear to be people connected to the company. With that in mind, I feel Knowledge is better without such content than simply having it locked for the foreseeable future. No doubt the contributors with a conflict of interest
369:
the nomination mentions COI editors were involved, I do not see that as a reason to determine that a company with 84 locations is not notable. Also whether or not the COI editors return, that too is not a reason to delete a notable company article.
211: 314:
can be a reasonable delete rationale, this has been worked on by established editors quite a bit and doesn't seem overly promotional. Any existing problems in that regard are certainly fixable. –
287: 164: 205: 267: 111: 96: 335:. Easily notable enough for an article. No good reason for deletion given in nomination. All that is relevant here is notability, not poor editing. -- 242:
A promotion-led Knowledge article that has links to editors who have been deleted from Knowledge due to potential corporate tie-ins, such as
171: 323: 137: 132: 141: 91: 84: 17: 124: 226: 193: 105: 101: 396: 40: 187: 319: 379: 361: 344: 327: 299: 279: 259: 183: 66: 392: 36: 340: 295: 275: 255: 233: 357: 219: 315: 128: 375: 80: 62: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
391:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
199: 336: 291: 271: 251: 353: 54: 311: 120: 72: 371: 58: 158: 244:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Sala90&action=edit&redlink=1
310:. The sourcing in the article already demonstrates notability. And while 250:
will return, as they have done in the past when the page was unlocked.
387:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
243: 154: 150: 146: 218: 288:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 399:). No further edits should be made to this page. 286:Note: This discussion has been included in the 266:Note: This discussion has been included in the 268:list of Business-related deletion discussions 232: 8: 112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 285: 265: 352:With 84 showrooms it is clearly notable. 7: 24: 97:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 380:22:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 362:00:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 345:11:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 328:02:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC) 300:23:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 280:23:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 260:23:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 67:22:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC) 87:(AfD)? Read these primers! 416: 389:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 85:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 302: 282: 102:Guide to deletion 92:How to contribute 57: 407: 237: 236: 222: 174: 162: 144: 82: 53: 34: 415: 414: 410: 409: 408: 406: 405: 404: 403: 397:deletion review 179: 170: 135: 119: 116: 79: 76: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 413: 411: 402: 401: 383: 382: 364: 347: 330: 304: 303: 283: 240: 239: 176: 115: 114: 109: 99: 94: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 412: 400: 398: 394: 390: 385: 384: 381: 377: 373: 368: 365: 363: 359: 355: 351: 348: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 329: 325: 321: 317: 316:Deacon Vorbis 313: 309: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 247: 245: 235: 231: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 185: 182: 181:Find sources: 177: 173: 169: 166: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 139: 134: 130: 126: 122: 121:Wren Kitchens 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 81: 74: 73:Wren Kitchens 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 388: 386: 366: 349: 332: 307: 248: 241: 229: 223: 215: 208: 202: 196: 190: 180: 167: 78: 49: 47: 31: 28: 206:free images 337:Necrothesp 292:BritishGuy 272:BritishGuy 252:BritishGuy 393:talk page 354:Dormskirk 308:SNOW Keep 37:talk page 395:or in a 165:View log 106:glossary 39:or in a 372:Wm335td 212:WP refs 200:scholar 138:protect 133:history 83:New to 59:Natg 19 324:videos 320:carbon 312:WP:TNT 184:Google 142:delete 227:JSTOR 188:books 172:Stats 159:views 151:watch 147:links 16:< 376:talk 367:Keep 358:talk 350:Keep 341:talk 333:Keep 296:talk 276:talk 256:talk 220:FENS 194:news 155:logs 129:talk 125:edit 63:talk 50:keep 234:TWL 163:– ( 378:) 360:) 343:) 326:) 322:• 298:) 290:. 278:) 270:. 258:) 246:. 214:) 157:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 131:| 127:| 65:) 52:. 374:( 356:( 339:( 318:( 294:( 274:( 254:( 238:) 230:· 224:· 216:· 209:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 186:( 178:( 175:) 168:· 161:) 123:( 108:) 104:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Natg 19
talk
22:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Wren Kitchens

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Wren Kitchens
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.