384:
A similar article is nominated for deletion today as well, although it appears to be a coincidence, not a conspiracy. However, single parent families are a fact of life, and
Knowledge (XXG) has a strong pro-television bent to it, with articles on nearly every facet of TV. This is no less worthy
335:
and I only created it late last night. We should give it at least a week or so for other editors to come along and improve it. Most articles take at least a few days to improve and it is is not really fair to delete an article that has had no chance for other editors to improve.
154:
for this term, most of which are for tvdads.com (a site which this article may have been created just to promote). Also, the examples (24, Desperate
Housewives, Skippy the Bush Kangaroo, Steptoe & Son, etc) are so loosely connected they violate
151:
78:
312:
353:
I would hardly call it a compromise. It was a suggestion by another editor (which I disagree with). I also dont think articles that focus solely on trivia cant be improved much
132:
332:
160:
73:
243:
Nowhere near a complete list, original research and, although it doesn't fit the broad definition, a smearing of BS. Single dad is a subgenre, at best.--
255:
per nom. Given the number of shows that have been created, you could fit a decent number into nearly any category. Doesn't make them notable.
211:- It's a huge stretch to say that this is a definable genre; most of the shows don't even match the characteristics cited in the article. —
308:
105:
100:
17:
366:
338:
304:
275:
197:
109:
440:
418:
405:
393:
372:
357:
344:
319:
295:
281:
259:
247:
235:
218:
203:
183:
167:
57:
92:
191:, because there appear to be enough notable TV shows that fit in this pattern to justify an article, if as the nominator
455:
36:
315:
it would be better if it was made by someone else. (If anyone else agrees that it should be nominated, that is).
230:
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
311:
which should also be nominated for deletion. I would nominate it myself but for reasons that I made clear in
227:
215:
96:
150:". I have tried to find sources confirming this is a notable genre in television, but there are only
270:
88:
63:
177:
52:
402:
212:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
328:
316:
192:
164:
433:
429:
156:
143:
139:
195:
suggests references can be used to show that it is not original research. Sincerely, --
437:
390:
49:
256:
244:
415:
176:, definitely a loosely associated list, original research, unverifiable, etc. etc.
291:
An encyclopedia shouldn't be the place to list such trivial details about fiction
126:
354:
292:
269:
Shouldn't the article nominated have a tag on it? I just went to the article
386:
364:
Well, I figure if someone suggested it, why not give it a try? :) --
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
226:
looks like original research and would be hard to verify.
122:
118:
114:
79:
Articles for deletion/TV Single Dads (2nd nomination)
333:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/TV_Single_Dads
309:
List of television characters who are single fathers
327:; I created it based on a compromise suggestion by
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
273:, but did not see the AfD tag on it. Regards, --
458:). No further edits should be made to this page.
146:. Article starts with the dubious statement; "
8:
71:
142:of loosely associated topics and much
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:Articles for deletion/TV Single Dads
70:
24:
414:a keep vote above you isn't it. -
389:, and makes more sense than same
305:User:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
148:The TV Single Dad show is a genre
385:than articles about episodes of
163:last year, with no consensus.
1:
368:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
340:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
277:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
199:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
159:. Article was nominated for
475:
441:18:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
419:19:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
406:16:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
394:00:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
373:17:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
358:17:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
345:16:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
320:05:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
296:04:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
282:04:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
260:03:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
248:03:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
236:03:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
219:03:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
204:03:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
184:03:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
168:02:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
58:07:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
451:Please do not modify it.
152:32 unique Google results
32:Please do not modify it.
313:another AFD discussion
69:AfDs for this article:
428:- Per nom. Fails
307:has just created
144:Original Research
466:
453:
371:
369:
343:
341:
280:
278:
202:
200:
180:
179:Ten Pound Hammer
130:
112:
55:
34:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:deletion review
449:
367:
365:
339:
337:
276:
274:
198:
196:
178:
103:
87:
84:
67:
53:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
461:
460:
444:
443:
423:
422:
421:
396:
378:
377:
376:
375:
361:
360:
348:
347:
322:
298:
285:
284:
271:TV Single Dads
263:
262:
250:
238:
221:
206:
186:
137:
136:
89:TV Single Dads
83:
82:
81:
76:
68:
66:
64:TV Single Dads
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
459:
457:
452:
446:
445:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
420:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
404:
400:
397:
395:
392:
388:
383:
380:
379:
374:
370:
363:
362:
359:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
342:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
294:
290:
287:
286:
283:
279:
272:
268:
265:
264:
261:
258:
254:
251:
249:
246:
242:
239:
237:
234:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
217:
214:
213:Laura Scudder
210:
207:
205:
201:
194:
190:
187:
185:
181:
175:
174:Strong delete
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
162:
158:
153:
149:
145:
141:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
80:
77:
75:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
425:
411:
398:
381:
324:
300:
288:
266:
252:
240:
231:
223:
208:
188:
173:
147:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
401:per above.
382:Strong Keep
317:Masaruemoto
193:Masaruemoto
165:Masaruemoto
410:Say, that
157:WP:NOT#DIR
140:WP:NOT#DIR
391:Mandsford
232:guitarist
387:Everwood
257:Resolute
245:Ispy1981
161:deletion
133:View log
416:MrFizyx
329:User:GT
325:Comment
301:Comment
267:Comment
106:protect
101:history
438:Bryson
434:WP:NOR
430:WP:NOT
426:Delete
403:Wryspy
399:Delete
289:Delete
253:Delete
241:Delete
228:Oyster
224:Delete
209:Delete
110:delete
46:delete
355:Corpx
293:Corpx
127:views
119:watch
115:links
54:desat
16:<
432:and
189:Keep
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
50:Core
48:. --
436:.--
331:at
182:•
131:– (
412:is
336:--
303:;
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
216:☎
135:)
129:)
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.