467:
cited on average about three times a year, almost all in reviews that, by their nature, cite all research papers deemed remotely relevant to their broader topics, and in the majority of cases reviews that have nothing to do with this specific application (e.g. one is on 'unusual things people are doing with TMV', another is on 'turning bacteria into computers'). This application was not notable when it was published, it is not notable now, and there is no reason to believe it will ever be notable in the future. WP:ATD-M says material in short articles can be merged, but that doesn't mean it should be merged when it isn't noteworthy.
288:- the broader concept is important, biological data storage. We already have articles on DNA based systems but this is an example of the broader biocomposite memory which is an important concept and one I vsbt find an article for. Can you try find somewhere to include this as the paper seems to have been relatively influential in terms of citations. I suggest redirect here as well
289:
466:
This is just one non-notable (never-notable) experiment, a proof of concept, and contrary to the claim made at the end, there doesn't seem to be any continuing research (it has been 14 years, and not a single one of the authors have cited this paper in a followup paper that I am seeing). It has been
290:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Virus_nanotechnology#:~:text=Plant%20viruses%20in%20nanotechnology,-Plant%20virus-based&text=Plant%20virus%20nanoparticles%20are%20non,by%20Raja%20muthuramalingam%20et%20al.&text=The%20capsids%20can%20be%20produced,a%20variety%20of%20heterologous%20systems
443:
Notability does not expire because all those papers are still there and the number of sources citing them and reporting them has increased since; it never goes down. Insofar as the specific technique may have been generalised, My very best wishes's suggestion is sensible per
352:- Every scientific result does not merit its own page, and all this cites is the original research publication. Yeah, these guys did this thing, and it has relevance to others doing something similar, so it gets cited occasionally, but it isn't a notable application.
249:
This misleading article seems to derive from the splash made from a few papers from 2006, but while undeniably cool, as far as I can tell this didn't lead anywhere, and it's not something you can buy. DOesn't seem of lasting notability.
218:
312:. They simply used the virons as templates for conventional inorganic deposition. I did note the relatively large number of cites, but it appears more as a one-off demonstration at this point.
331:- per above virus nanotechnology is an appropriate redirect. There is already some discussion of plant virus nanotechnology there. Per Mangoe's point this is just an example of that.
212:
509:
Sure "notability does not expire" but this was never notable in the first place. Very specific technique that does not warrant an article and is not covered independently.
492:. The stated application is one of numerous possible nanotechnological applications of virus particles, and the material here will fit in well there as a small example.
171:
144:
139:
267:
148:
131:
369:. Agricolae sums up most of my thoughts already on notability. I'll tack on though that this doesn't look useful for a redirect. It looks like it's just a
118:
178:
103:
63:
233:
546:, but the term "tobacco mosaic virus memory" itself appears to be a neologism without sufficient uptake. Hence no call for a redirect. --
200:
68:
98:
91:
17:
194:
563:
534:
513:
501:
476:
457:
433:
403:
382:
361:
340:
321:
301:
279:
259:
73:
558:
399:
190:
135:
112:
108:
412:
240:
580:
453:
127:
79:
40:
395:
58:
497:
378:
206:
576:
530:
36:
373:, and biological storage/memory would be the terms people would use if they were searching, not this.
543:
489:
449:
391:
472:
370:
357:
226:
53:
493:
336:
297:
554:
522:
374:
87:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
575:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
526:
317:
255:
445:
274:
468:
424:
353:
510:
332:
293:
548:
165:
313:
251:
271:
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
415:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
161:
157:
153:
225:
421:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
583:). No further edits should be made to this page.
525:, but this isn't the place for a crystal ball. -
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
521:It's not currently notable by itself. Perhaps
239:
8:
268:list of Science-related deletion discussions
119:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
265:
542:The experiment seems worth a mention at
7:
24:
104:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
308:It's not biological storage
128:Tobacco mosaic virus memory
94:(AfD)? Read these primers!
80:Tobacco mosaic virus memory
600:
514:20:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
502:11:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
458:11:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
434:10:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
404:18:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
383:18:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
362:23:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
341:19:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
322:18:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
302:17:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
280:16:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
260:15:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
573:Please do not modify it.
564:23:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
535:12:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
477:18:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
74:00:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
92:Articles for deletion
544:Tobacco mosaic virus
490:Virus nanotechnology
392:Virus nanotechnology
396:My very best wishes
486:Merge and redirect
388:Merge and redirect
562:
436:
432:
282:
109:Guide to deletion
99:How to contribute
591:
552:
551:
431:
429:
422:
420:
418:
416:
244:
243:
229:
181:
169:
151:
89:
34:
599:
598:
594:
593:
592:
590:
589:
588:
587:
581:deletion review
547:
437:
425:
423:
411:
409:
277:
186:
177:
142:
126:
123:
86:
83:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
597:
595:
586:
585:
567:
566:
537:
516:
504:
482:
481:
480:
479:
461:
460:
419:
408:
407:
406:
385:
364:
346:
345:
344:
343:
325:
324:
305:
304:
275:
247:
246:
183:
122:
121:
116:
106:
101:
84:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
596:
584:
582:
578:
574:
569:
568:
565:
560:
556:
550:
545:
541:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
517:
515:
512:
508:
505:
503:
499:
495:
494:Chiswick Chap
491:
487:
484:
483:
478:
474:
470:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
442:
439:
438:
435:
430:
428:
417:
414:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
347:
342:
338:
334:
330:
327:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
281:
278:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
188:Find sources:
184:
180:
176:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
93:
88:
81:
78:
76:
75:
72:
71:
67:
66:
62:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
572:
570:
539:
518:
506:
485:
440:
426:
410:
387:
375:Kingofaces43
371:WP:NEOLOGISM
366:
349:
328:
309:
285:
248:
236:
230:
222:
215:
209:
203:
197:
187:
174:
85:
69:
64:
59:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
527:Kj cheetham
213:free images
523:WP:TOOSOON
441:Keep/merge
427:Sandstein
577:talk page
469:Agricolae
354:Agricolae
55:King of ♥
37:talk page
579:or in a
559:contribs
511:Reywas92
446:WP:ATD-M
413:Relisted
333:PainProf
329:Redirect
294:PainProf
172:View log
113:glossary
39:or in a
549:Elmidae
286:Comment
272:~ Amkgp
219:WP refs
207:scholar
145:protect
140:history
90:New to
540:Delete
519:Delete
507:Delete
450:Andrew
367:Delete
350:Delete
314:Mangoe
310:per se
252:Mangoe
191:Google
149:delete
50:delete
234:JSTOR
195:books
179:Stats
166:views
158:watch
154:links
16:<
555:talk
531:talk
498:talk
473:talk
454:talk
400:talk
379:talk
358:talk
337:talk
318:talk
298:talk
256:talk
227:FENS
201:news
162:logs
136:talk
132:edit
488:to
452:🐉(
390:to
241:TWL
170:– (
557:·
533:)
500:)
475:)
456:)
448:.
402:)
394:.
381:)
360:)
339:)
320:)
300:)
292:.
276:💬
270:.
258:)
221:)
164:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
52:.
561:)
553:(
529:(
496:(
471:(
398:(
377:(
356:(
335:(
316:(
296:(
254:(
245:)
237:·
231:·
223:·
216:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
193:(
185:(
182:)
175:·
168:)
130:(
115:)
111:(
70:♠
65:♣
60:♦
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.