254:. I don't see a single in-depth coverage (a numnber mention in passing, as he is briefly quoted in a number of news stories as a lawyer involved in some cases that attracted media attention). There is effectively nothing to be said about him outside which cases he represented, the bio for him is unreferenced (through I would expect it could be referenced to PRIMARY SPS sources like his company's page). No awards or indications he is notable - just a lawyer doing his job. Thoughts?
398:
When your claimed #1 actress client is not notable enough to rate an article, I think you are even less likely to rate an article. The start is clearly overly promotional on the board of just plain lying to make Spodek look more notable than he really
203:
353:
275:
Really just wanted to say that it's hilarious the photo he saw fit to upload of himself shows him posing in front of a bar cart. That said, the most substantial article I found on him is
156:
197:
376:
103:
330:
88:
279:, and it doesn't feel like much. The one thing that would potentially give me pause is the number of mentions of him in relation to the high-profile
276:
163:
129:
124:
83:
76:
17:
133:
218:
185:
116:
97:
93:
284:
425:
404:
40:
296:
179:
288:
421:
175:
36:
408:
387:
368:
345:
321:
300:
266:
58:
120:
400:
292:
225:
211:
112:
64:
305:
He can certainly be mentioned in her article, but a redirect there wouldn't be a good idea per
380:
362:
339:
315:
260:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
191:
251:
243:
239:
247:
235:
358:
335:
311:
280:
256:
150:
306:
54:
416:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
354:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
146:
142:
138:
210:
291:), but even then, they're peripheral mentions. --
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:Note: This discussion has been included in the
352:Note: This discussion has been included in the
329:Note: This discussion has been included in the
377:list of New York-related deletion discussions
224:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
374:
351:
328:
331:list of Law-related deletion discussions
359:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
336:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
312:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
257:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
24:
89:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
234:Bio of a lawyer, created by a
1:
250:. Crucially, seems to fail
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
445:
409:02:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
388:07:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
369:05:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
346:05:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
322:02:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
301:06:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
267:05:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
59:07:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
418:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Articles for deletion
401:John Pack Lambert
390:
371:
348:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
436:
385:
365:
342:
318:
263:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
74:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
381:
367:
363:
344:
340:
320:
316:
265:
261:
242:an undisclosed
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
412:
411:
392:
391:
372:
357:
349:
334:
326:
325:
324:
310:
293:Usernameunique
255:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
410:
406:
402:
397:
394:
393:
389:
386:
384:
378:
373:
370:
366:
360:
355:
350:
347:
343:
337:
332:
327:
323:
319:
313:
308:
307:WP:R#ASTONISH
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
258:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
415:
395:
383:CAPTAIN RAJU
382:
283:case (e.g.,
281:Anna Sorokin
272:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
198:free images
113:Todd Spodek
65:Todd Spodek
364:reply here
341:reply here
317:reply here
262:reply here
422:talk page
37:talk page
424:or in a
277:this one
273:Comment:
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
252:WP:NBIO
244:WP:PAID
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
396:Delete
248:WP:COI
240:likely
236:WP:SPA
176:Google
134:delete
50:delete
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
405:talk
309:. --
297:talk
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
399:is.
226:TWL
155:– (
407:)
379:.
356:.
333:.
299:)
287:,
238:,
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
403:(
361:|
338:|
314:|
295:(
289:2
285:1
259:|
246:/
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.