320:. Absolutely not notable. (To anticipate a potential objection, I will mention the following. The creator of the article, who has dedicated a significant amount of effort to trying to get articles on this topic established on several Wikipedias, objected to the deletion on German Knowledge (XXG) on the grounds that the telescope is a Japanese invention, and is therefore unlikely to show up in German-language searches. I have therefore searched for タニグチ式望遠鏡, which the creator of the articles gives as the Japanese name of the telescope. I found hits on Japanese Knowledge (XXG), Wikimedia commons, several Knowledge (XXG) mirrors, Twitter, and several other Japanese web sites which were clearly similar repositories for user-submitted content, and also none of which had more than brief mentions of the telescope. It is perfectly clear that the attempt to explain away lack of sources found in searches as being because all information about it is in Japanese is totally spurious. There is no substantial coverage of it in reliable sources anywhere, in Japanese or any other language.)
513:
287:
Seems no evidence of significance at all. The reference in
Japanese does not seem to be anything to do with telescopes, but features Taniguchi, who says he wants to implement his telescope. And note also that "Taniguchian" is likely to be a self-invented faux-adjective; needs considerable evidence to
471:
That guy ain't Newton, that's for sure. Maybe there are
Japanese sources that remain undetectable (if there are, they would be pretty definitely undetectable to me), but absent such, there is insufficient coverage to show notability.
305:
There isn't evidence of significance of the telescope, and there aren't enough sources on this in
English, and it doesn't appears to be notable. It also has been nominated for deletion on Japanese Knowledge (XXG). Cheers.
198:
415:
it is wriiten that 「2015年特許庁に特許申請、2016年に特許取得後、国際出願を経て、2019年4月米国特許として認められる。」（Patent application to the Japan Patent Office in 2015, Japanese Patent in 2016, through international application, US patent at April
192:
159:
250:
267:
233:: No significant coverage besides the patent. No indication that such a telescope was ever built or that it was discussed in scientific or technical literature.
91:
106:
132:
127:
136:
119:
498:
412:
86:
79:
52:. Patents are not independent secondary sources, so do not contribute to showing notability, and other sources appear to be lacking.
17:
213:
180:
100:
96:
484:
545:
174:
40:
524:
458:
435:
375:
528:
506:
489:
462:
439:
402:
379:
354:
329:
312:
297:
276:
259:
242:
61:
450:
446:
170:
398:
389:
I fail to see how the fact that
Taniguchi-san filed a patent for his idea, could anyhow match the criteria under
350:
342:
123:
502:
220:
293:
367:
115:
67:
337:. Zero notability whatsoever of telescope and inventor, therefore already deleted on dewiki and frwiki. --
520:
454:
431:
371:
541:
238:
36:
394:
346:
338:
206:
186:
289:
480:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
540:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
445:(to JSW) I feel you are misunderstanding my message I wrote at 19:13, 2. Aug. 2021 (CEST) in
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
234:
57:
390:
230:
512:
307:
271:
254:
325:
474:
153:
53:
321:
370:. Therefore, this invention described in the document is notable. --
536:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
345:) 05:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC) ....and ãlso deleted on jawiki. --
149:
145:
141:
519:
Not all telescope inventors are as famous as Newton.--
205:
430:, what is the content ? (Please show some of them.)--
449:. I think that it should be better to discuss it in
219:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
548:). No further edits should be made to this page.
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
249:Note: This discussion has been included in the
251:list of Products-related deletion discussions
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
268:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
265:
248:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
511:
451:de:Benutzer Diskussion:Karsten11
447:de:Benutzer Diskussion:Karsten11
92:Introduction to deletion process
288:show this as an English usage.
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
565:
529:16:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
507:20:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
490:01:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
463:13:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
440:13:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
403:08:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
380:07:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
368:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
355:16:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
330:22:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
313:19:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
298:19:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
277:17:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
260:17:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
243:17:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
62:19:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
538:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
411:(to Müllt-Renner) In
116:Taniguchian telescope
80:Articles for deletion
68:Taniguchian telescope
364:Significant coverage
426:(to JSW) You write
362:USPTO.report is a
488:
417:
405:
279:
262:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
556:
515:
478:
477:
410:
388:
310:
274:
257:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
564:
563:
559:
558:
557:
555:
554:
553:
552:
546:deletion review
497:not notable. --
473:
308:
272:
255:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
562:
560:
551:
550:
532:
531:
521:Süd-Russisches
509:
499:84.115.228.224
492:
455:Süd-Russisches
443:
442:
432:Süd-Russisches
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
383:
382:
372:Süd-Russisches
357:
332:
315:
300:
281:
280:
263:
229:Does not meet
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
561:
549:
547:
543:
539:
534:
533:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
491:
486:
482:
476:
470:
467:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
414:
409:
408:
407:
406:
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
386:
385:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:described in
365:
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
311:
304:
301:
299:
295:
291:
290:Imaginatorium
286:
283:
282:
278:
275:
269:
264:
261:
258:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
537:
535:
516:
494:
468:
453:than here.--
444:
427:
395:Müllt-Renner
363:
359:
347:Müllt-Renner
339:Müllt-Renner
334:
317:
302:
284:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
413:ja:タニグチ式望遠鏡
235:Count Count
193:free images
542:talk page
309:Tahaaleem
273:Spiderone
256:Spiderone
37:talk page
544:or in a
517:Comment:
485:contribs
428:spurious
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
475:Elmidae
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
495:Delete
469:Delete
391:WP:GNG
335:Delete
318:Delete
303:Delete
285:Delete
231:WP:GNG
171:Google
137:delete
54:RL0919
50:delete
416:2019）
393:. --
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
525:talk
503:talk
481:talk
459:talk
436:talk
399:talk
376:talk
360:KEEP
351:talk
343:talk
326:talk
294:talk
239:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
322:JBW
221:TWL
158:– (
527:)
505:)
483:·
472:--
461:)
438:)
401:)
378:)
353:)
328:)
296:)
270:.
253:.
241:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
523:(
501:(
487:)
479:(
457:(
434:(
397:(
374:(
349:(
341:(
324:(
292:(
237:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.