Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Textative - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

120: 256: 17: 87: 82: 91: 276: 36: 74: 206: 275:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251: 162: 246: 202: 261: 237: 210: 189: 166: 148: 78: 56: 70: 62: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
158: 132: 128: 230: 183: 50: 108: 223: 176:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
200:- Quite a few Ghits for it, but it's still a non-notable neologism. — 269:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115: 104: 100: 96: 181:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 279:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 157:: Non-notable neologism. -- 296: 262:23:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 238:16:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 211:00:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 190:00:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 167:03:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 149:03:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 57:05:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 272:Please do not modify it. 245:Per WP:NEO, WP:NFT, etc 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 236: 192: 146: 129:Original research 287: 274: 259: 254: 249: 235: 233: 227: 221: 186: 180: 178: 145: 143: 127:Contested prod. 118: 112: 94: 53: 34: 295: 294: 290: 289: 288: 286: 285: 284: 283: 277:deletion review 270: 257: 252: 247: 231: 225: 222: 203:LinguistAtLarge 184: 174: 139: 114: 85: 69: 66: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 293: 291: 282: 281: 265: 264: 240: 214: 213: 194: 193: 179: 171: 170: 169: 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 292: 280: 278: 273: 267: 266: 263: 260: 255: 250: 244: 241: 239: 234: 229: 228: 219: 216: 215: 212: 209: 208: 204: 199: 196: 195: 191: 188: 187: 177: 173: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 152: 151: 150: 142: 138: 134: 130: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 271: 268: 242: 224: 217: 201: 197: 182: 175: 154: 140: 136: 126: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 159:DanielRigal 141:Blanchardb 133:neologism 71:Textative 63:Textative 147:- timed 131:about a 121:View log 185:MBisanz 137:Delete. 88:protect 83:history 52:MBisanz 243:Delete 218:Delete 198:Delete 155:Delete 116:delete 92:delete 46:delete 253:drink 226:Chzz 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 248:Lets 220:pn 207:Talk 163:talk 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 258:Tea 232:► 205:• 165:) 135:. 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 161:( 144:- 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
MBisanz
05:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Textative
Textative
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Original research
neologism
03:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
DanielRigal
talk
03:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
MBisanz
00:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
LinguistAtLarge
Talk
00:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 Chzz 
 ► 

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.