268:, the subject is no more notable than any other city councillor. Within the article, the content ("subject said X", "subject is against illegal dumping", "subject is concerned about speeding") is ROTM stuff we'd expect for any local politician and is supported by the same ROTM/passing-mention coverage we'd expect for any other local politician. (The sources used to support some of the claims are weak; at best.) Outside the article, I can find no independent/in-depth coverage where the subject is the primary topic of that coverage. A
229:
96:
91:
86:
272:
just returns the same "local politician made a statement about X" or "local politician was asked a question about Y" stuff we might expect for any other similar local office holder.
329:
190:
309:
289:
223:
122:
264:, local politicians in Ireland do not meet the criteria (a city councillor is not an "international, national, or state/province–wide office"). In terms of
81:
137:
269:
419:
per nom. While a slight case could've previously been made for Tynan being notable as the Worker's Party's only elected representative, it appears
420:
117:
110:
17:
402:, and the sourcing is not achieving the depth, range or volume needed to make him more special than most other city councillors.
59:
131:
127:
438:
411:
386:
365:
341:
321:
301:
281:
65:
163:
158:
244:
167:
455:
40:
211:
434:
150:
399:
205:
451:
36:
201:
382:
317:
297:
277:
154:
361:
337:
237:
251:
146:
71:
407:
106:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
450:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
374:
261:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
353:
265:
378:
313:
293:
273:
430:
357:
333:
217:
398:
for the purposes of securing the "inherent" notability of its city councillors under
53:
403:
184:
395:
425:
352:
there is virtually nothing written that makes him notable, so does not pass
377:, local councillor who does not meet criteria, also fails WP:Notability.
446:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
423:
as of a few days ago. So yeah, seems alright to delete.
180:
176:
172:
236:
250:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
458:). No further edits should be made to this page.
330:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
328:Note: This discussion has been included in the
308:Note: This discussion has been included in the
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
97:Articles for deletion/Ted Tynan (4th nomination)
92:Articles for deletion/Ted Tynan (3rd nomination)
87:Articles for deletion/Ted Tynan (2nd nomination)
310:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
290:list of Ireland-related deletion discussions
138:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
327:
307:
287:
260:Non-notable local politician. In terms of
79:
270:search in the Irish Times for example
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
123:Introduction to deletion process
394:. Cork, while lovely, is not a
82:Articles for deletion/Ted Tynan
1:
113:(AfD)? Read these primers!
475:
439:16:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
421:this is no longer the case
412:13:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
387:13:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
366:21:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
342:21:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
322:20:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
302:20:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
282:20:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
66:22:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
448:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
111:Articles for deletion
344:
324:
304:
128:Guide to deletion
118:How to contribute
64:
466:
373:per nom - Fails
255:
254:
240:
188:
170:
108:
56:
34:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:deletion review
197:
161:
145:
142:
105:
102:
101:
75:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
461:
460:
442:
441:
414:
400:WP:POLOUTCOMES
389:
368:
346:
345:
325:
305:
258:
257:
194:
141:
140:
135:
125:
120:
103:
100:
99:
94:
89:
84:
78:
76:
74:
69:
58:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
459:
457:
453:
449:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
422:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
253:
249:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
203:
200:
199:Find sources:
195:
192:
186:
182:
178:
174:
169:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
124:
121:
119:
116:
115:
114:
112:
107:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
447:
445:
435:see my edits
424:
416:
391:
370:
349:
259:
247:
241:
233:
226:
220:
214:
208:
198:
104:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
396:global city
224:free images
431:chat to me
379:Spleodrach
314:Guliolopez
294:Guliolopez
274:Guliolopez
452:talk page
358:ww2censor
356:per nom.
334:Shellwood
147:Ted Tynan
72:Ted Tynan
37:talk page
454:or in a
191:View log
132:glossary
54:Eddie891
39:or in a
404:Bearcat
375:WP:NPOL
350:Delete:
262:WP:NPOL
230:WP refs
218:scholar
164:protect
159:history
109:New to
417:Delete
392:Delete
371:Delete
354:WP:GNG
266:WP:GNG
202:Google
168:delete
50:delete
245:JSTOR
206:books
185:views
177:watch
173:links
16:<
426:ser!
408:talk
383:talk
362:talk
338:talk
318:talk
298:talk
278:talk
238:FENS
212:news
181:logs
155:talk
151:edit
60:Work
252:TWL
189:– (
437:)
433:-
410:)
385:)
364:)
340:)
332:.
320:)
312:.
300:)
292:.
280:)
232:)
183:|
179:|
175:|
171:|
166:|
162:|
157:|
153:|
52:.
429:(
406:(
381:(
360:(
336:(
316:(
296:(
276:(
256:)
248:·
242:·
234:·
227:·
221:·
215:·
209:·
204:(
196:(
193:)
187:)
149:(
134:)
130:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.