Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/TemaTres - Knowledge

Source 📝

230:
enhanced through crowd sourced contributions of add-on code (sorry, no reference for this other than personal knowledge and experience). 2) It is the engine behind many of the most important literature and art databases and archives worldwide. 3) While indexing and archiving isn't a topic of broad general interest, the quality thesaurus construction is the essence of what makes any literature database query result in a satisfactory list of relevant material. 4) I would be pleased to follow any guidance for making this article content less likely to be labeled spammy. 5) Perhaps, an alternative article should be written with the title Thesaurus Construction that has a subsection on software tools. Librarians, indexers, fact-checkers, and other knowledge-access professionals are quite interested in this topic.--David Lawrence, Ph.D.; San Diego State University 18:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
256:
nature of TemaTres is unclear, it seems that is an argument for making changes to the content of the article and not for its removal. If there has been no misunderstanding, perhaps Razr Nation could expand upon her or his concerns. As it stands, it is difficult to prepare a cogent counter to a telegraphic remark. While the topic of thesaurus construction, development,and implementation may be of interest to no more than one or two hundred thousand people in the English-speaking world, that is more than the number of people who might be interested in some other Knowledge topics.
229:
management system'. I have read other Knowledge discussions about notability, particularly concerning that concept where it applies to niche concepts. I suggest that TemaTres is indeed notable- 1) It is the only free open source literature database thesaurus construction software that is continuously
255:
I am also puzzled about the "management system" component of the delete request. I suspect that Razr Nation's use of the phrase could indicate a lack of understanding of the nature of TemaTres, its purpose, its use, and its importance to library and information science. If the problem is that the
372:
There are two kinds of sources in this Knowledge article: 1) articles from peer-reviewed journals that describe the value of open-source software ( and TemaTres in particular ) for literature database management; and 2) connections to the online databases used as examples of the systems that are
319:
I did not intend to suggest multiple votes. I have added several citations to articles in peer reviewed journals that discuss TemaTres and its value as an information tool.--David Lawrence, Ph.D.; San Diego State University 04:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
345:
I can't find any information in the sources you've added to the article. Please, if you will provide a link, try to make it the most specific as possible. Do not link only the main domain, give the complete url wre the relevant review is stored. —
166: 119: 462:
or merge into the article on literature database thesaurus construction software, in the free open source section. Notability cannot be found. --05:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
236: 160: 126: 17: 389: 336: 283: 549: 92: 87: 373:
built from TemaTres-produced thesauri.David Lawrence, Ph.D.; San Diego State University 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
181: 96: 148: 291:
You should not vote keep more than once, as it looks like you are three different users instead of one. Thanks. —
593: 79: 40: 542: 490: 142: 589: 571: 416: 356: 301: 57: 36: 377: 324: 271: 138: 574: 558: 521: 517: 496: 450: 420: 366: 311: 248: 217: 174: 83: 61: 485: 385: 332: 279: 188: 509: 244: 75: 67: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
588:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
531: 470: 432: 412: 401: 347: 292: 207: 198: 53: 260:
Another comment about notability or importance. There is a TemaTres page in es.wikipedia (
513: 261: 154: 381: 328: 275: 512:
for me. Given adequate coverage, I encourage re-submission at a later date though.
444: 240: 267:--David Lawrence, Ph.D.; San Diego State University 22:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 113: 534:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
473:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
435:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
404:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
262:
http://es.wikipedia.org/search/?title=TemaTres&action=history
582:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
508:: Software released less than two weeks ago. Looks like a 109: 105: 101: 173: 541:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 480:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 442:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 411:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 596:). No further edits should be made to this page. 237:list of Software-related deletion discussions 187: 8: 235:Note: This debate has been included in the 234: 7: 225:I am puzzled about the meaning of, ' 24: 197:Not notable management system. — 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 570:per the comment by Faustus37. 482: 1: 559:19:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 522:04:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 497:23:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 451:00:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 575:19:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 421:18:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC) 367:05:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 312:00:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 249:01:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 218:05:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 62:21:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 613: 585:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 561: 499: 453: 423: 394: 380:comment added by 341: 327:comment added by 288: 274:comment added by 251: 604: 587: 556: 547: 540: 536: 493: 488: 484: 479: 475: 447: 441: 437: 410: 406: 393: 374: 364: 354: 340: 321: 309: 299: 287: 268: 215: 205: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 612: 611: 607: 606: 605: 603: 602: 601: 600: 594:deletion review 583: 550: 543: 529: 491: 486: 468: 445: 430: 399: 375: 357: 348: 322: 302: 293: 269: 208: 199: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 610: 608: 599: 598: 578: 577: 564: 563: 562: 538: 537: 526: 525: 524: 502: 501: 500: 477: 476: 465: 464: 463: 456: 455: 454: 439: 438: 427: 426: 425: 424: 408: 407: 396: 370: 369: 317: 316: 315: 314: 265: 253: 252: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 609: 597: 595: 591: 586: 580: 579: 576: 573: 569: 566: 565: 560: 557: 555: 554: 548: 546: 539: 535: 533: 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 504: 503: 498: 495: 494: 489: 478: 474: 472: 467: 466: 461: 458: 457: 452: 449: 448: 440: 436: 434: 429: 428: 422: 418: 414: 409: 405: 403: 398: 397: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 368: 365: 362: 361: 355: 353: 352: 344: 343: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 313: 310: 307: 306: 300: 298: 297: 290: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 266: 263: 259: 258: 257: 250: 246: 242: 238: 233: 232: 231: 228: 224: 220: 219: 216: 213: 212: 206: 204: 203: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 584: 581: 567: 552: 551: 544: 530: 505: 481: 469: 459: 443: 431: 400: 376:— Preceding 371: 359: 358: 350: 349: 323:— Preceding 318: 304: 303: 295: 294: 270:— Preceding 254: 226: 222: 221: 210: 209: 201: 200: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 49: 47: 31: 28: 572:Morefoolhim 483:-- Cheers, 413:Mark Arsten 227:not notable 161:free images 54:Mark Arsten 510:WP:TOOSOON 590:talk page 553:Strikeout 545:Automatic 514:Faustus37 241:• Gene93k 37:talk page 592:or in a 532:Relisted 471:Relisted 433:Relisted 402:Relisted 390:contribs 382:Davidl53 378:unsigned 337:contribs 329:Davidl53 325:unsigned 284:contribs 276:Davidl53 272:unsigned 120:View log 76:TemaTres 68:TemaTres 39:or in a 492:Huntley 446:MBisanz 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 568:Delete 506:Delete 460:Delete 139:Google 97:delete 50:delete 487:Riley 223:Keep: 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 518:talk 417:talk 386:talk 333:talk 280:talk 245:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 189:TWL 118:– ( 520:) 419:) 392:) 388:• 339:) 335:• 286:) 282:• 264:). 247:) 239:. 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 52:. 516:( 415:( 384:( 363:™ 360:Ṉ 351:Ṟ 331:( 308:™ 305:Ṉ 296:Ṟ 278:( 243:( 214:™ 211:Ṉ 202:Ṟ 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Mark Arsten
talk
21:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
TemaTres
TemaTres
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.