393:. They are among a large number of bands of this ilk who got Knowledge articles when they emerged during the last heyday of this style of music, which happens to be the same time vast numbers of articles were being started with little or no sourcing about non-notable subjects (I was as guilty of this as anyone). That so many such articles were written is partially an example of systematic bias but is also an accident of history (the establishment pushing bands like this - while their fans denied the fact - on an "anything but So Solid Crew" principle just at the time that Knowledge was exploding in size with little oversight). Most were only marginally notable at the time and have turned out to have even less notability, and many have been deleted. This should go the same way. The bands of that time who were successful enough to be lastingly notable will have multiple sources beyond long-dormant MySpace pages (not a reliable source even in its heyday) and the like.
217:
297:
170:
211:
317:
277:
117:
361:- They got a few local gig reviews and minor mentions of an album release, but I don't think that satisfies the requirements for non-trivial coverage at
102:
177:
380:
344:, because the sources link to discography sites, press releases, and one of them links to myspace, which is obviously a primary source.
143:
138:
147:
130:
97:
90:
67:
17:
232:
199:
111:
107:
419:
193:
40:
402:
385:
376:
353:
349:
329:
309:
289:
269:
189:
72:
398:
134:
415:
36:
239:
341:
126:
78:
325:
305:
225:
61:
367:
345:
394:
285:
265:
86:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
414:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
205:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
362:
321:
301:
54:
257:
281:
261:
249:
164:
256:) The award for best band was only a local award that did not give them lasting
254:
I created a search to try and remove the military and other unrelated ghits
260:
and they broke up the year after to concentrate on uni studies.
410:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
298:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
160:
156:
152:
248:
All the sources are broke or unreliable. A search for
224:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:). No further edits should be made to this page.
316:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:Note: This discussion has been included in the
276:Note: This discussion has been included in the
252:yielded nothing of use, in fact nothing at all.(
238:
8:
318:list of England-related deletion discussions
118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
315:
295:
278:list of Music-related deletion discussions
275:
7:
24:
103:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
403:22:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
386:13:26, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
354:00:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
330:00:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
310:00:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
290:00:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
270:00:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
73:03:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
93:(AfD)? Read these primers!
439:
412:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
91:Articles for deletion
371:
332:
312:
292:
255:
108:Guide to deletion
98:How to contribute
430:
384:
369:
253:
243:
242:
228:
180:
168:
150:
88:
70:
64:
57:
34:
438:
437:
433:
432:
431:
429:
428:
427:
426:
420:deletion review
366:
340:- doesn't pass
250:more references
185:
176:
141:
127:The Auxiliaries
125:
122:
85:
82:
79:The Auxiliaries
68:
62:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
436:
434:
425:
424:
406:
405:
388:
356:
334:
333:
313:
293:
246:
245:
182:
121:
120:
115:
105:
100:
83:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
435:
423:
421:
417:
413:
408:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
387:
382:
378:
374:
373:
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
346:Analog Horror
343:
342:WP:GARAGEBAND
339:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
251:
241:
237:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
191:
188:
187:Find sources:
183:
179:
175:
172:
166:
162:
158:
154:
149:
145:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
119:
116:
113:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
95:
94:
92:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
66:
65:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
409:
395:RobinCarmody
390:
368:
358:
337:
247:
235:
229:
221:
214:
208:
202:
196:
186:
173:
84:
60:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
350:Communicate
212:free images
370:DOOMSDAYER
258:notability
416:talk page
322:Shellwood
302:Shellwood
37:talk page
418:or in a
381:Contribs
363:WP:NBAND
171:View log
112:glossary
39:or in a
282:Mattg82
262:Mattg82
218:WP refs
206:scholar
144:protect
139:history
89:New to
391:Delete
359:Delete
338:Delete
190:Google
148:delete
56:Eagles
50:delete
365:. ---
233:JSTOR
194:books
178:Stats
165:views
157:watch
153:links
16:<
399:talk
377:Talk
326:talk
306:talk
286:talk
266:talk
226:FENS
200:news
161:logs
135:talk
131:edit
63:24/7
372:520
348:, (
240:TWL
169:– (
69:(C)
401:)
352:)
328:)
320:.
308:)
300:.
288:)
280:.
268:)
220:)
163:|
159:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
52:.
397:(
383:)
379:|
375:(
324:(
304:(
284:(
264:(
244:)
236:·
230:·
222:·
215:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
192:(
184:(
181:)
174:·
167:)
129:(
114:)
110:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.