Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/The B-Team (professional wrestling) - Knowledge

Source 📝

983:- I have commented on this before the re-entry opened and I will say it again, what a nonsense reason to raise an AfD. They're evidently listed as the tag team champions on WWE.com, and WWE recognise them as a team. Not having them on here would be silly. They deserve a page because of all their work over the last two years or so, first of all with the Miztourage and then their work as The B-Team. It would be a shame if this got deleted before SummerSlam, as they have a heavy chance of competing there due to their work and feuds as the tag team champions on the Raw brand. Oh, and we have more users favouring keep than those favouring delete, so I think the argument in question is settled really. -- 823:– I've already said plenty about this notion of constantly giving undue weight to something merely because it's what's happening now in the WWE. Speaking of which: back when wrestling promotions focused primarily or solely on live events and ran them full time, "The B-Team" had an entirely different meaning. Those promotions which ran more than one event per night would have a "B-team" which predominantly worked the smaller shows. As this is referred to in 508:- Most likely because Hardy and Wyatt literally formed two months ago. The B-Team (not counting The Social Outcasts) has been around for a year now and they've had time to gel as a unit and they appear to be over. As much as I like Hardy and Wyatt, they were a much better fit as rivals, their team seems to be contrived and crowd reaction seems to reflect this. The B-Team even got a big pop when they won at 560:- per tag team championship reign and their win at Extreme Rules, this will only lead to a significant level of notability and they've been around long enough to have their own Knowledge entry. Also pointing out the fact that if they hold a record with the championships, they would have also met set requirements for an article deeming it as noteworthy, therefore I say keep the article up. -- 662:
I mistakenly clicked on close but reverted it. Those in favor of keeping should please address the concerns that the coverage is not sufficient to establish notability, considering that there is no notability guideline that confers automatic notability to teams that won a championship. That said, for
369:- They've racked up plenty of wins against the likes of The Hardys, Dean Ambrose and Heath Slater & Rhyno over the past year. They seem to be primed for a push and are over, and if anything, they deserve and article for all the work they did with The Miz, which was all over Raw last year. -- 805:
Axel and Dallas have been teaming together for the better part of 3 years in 3 different groups (Social Outcasts, Miztourage, B Team)...wasn't like they were just slapped together last week, there's some established history plus now a tag title reign.
1154:- As mentioned above, there is no notability guideline that states that a team that has been together for a certain amount of time or held a championship is automatically notable above and beyond the individual members. At this time, a team must meet 872:. However, that's avoiding my point that the article title is incongruous with existing content, which in itself affirms my original point about undue weight. If we're going to be The Church of What's Happening Now, I would at least expect to see 212: 827:, you run the risk of once again misleading readers into thinking that what's happening now in the WWE is all that matters. If this is kept (which I doubt will happen), there should at least be a hatnote to this effect. 709: 1053: 206: 399:
as they now hold the Raw Tag Team Championships so the "no championships/accomplishments" argument no longer holds water, nor does the "no notability as an established team" argument.
138: 133: 142: 288: 125: 381:- Per above. The B-Team has earned so many wins and losses as part of the Miztourage before getting a "breakup breakout" by being undefeated since splitting up with The Miz. 268: 488:- It should be noted, without winning these tag team championships, they aren't independently notable. We should really establish more of a criteria for cases like these. 348: 308: 165: 328: 741:
Routine coverage; the fact that they won a tag team championship doesn't matter much. The list of tag team champions that got their articles deleted is endless.
172: 960:, was recently closed as delete, and there isn’t much difference with this team; barely any notable coverage and only one championship win. I agree that it is 112: 97: 1073:
year. Within that year, they have had zero accomplishments and, as shown in the article, barely any notable coverage before winning the championship.
596:
I am not seeing any policy based reasons for keeping. They have been together, yes. They won the championship, yes. Do they meet the standards set in
227: 956:
Simply because "they are the Tag Team Champions" does not mean they are notable enough for an article. The team that they won the championship from,
910: 824: 194: 766:
This is a terrible reason to delete a article. Just because other stuff existed at one point doesn't mean this article should be deleted.
188: 1192: 1137: 1106: 1086: 1061: 1057: 1044: 1022: 1004: 973: 947: 922: 894: 863: 845: 813: 793: 779: 754: 733: 700: 681: 642: 612: 584: 552: 532: 500: 478: 459: 418: 391: 360: 340: 320: 300: 280: 260: 67: 940: 772: 414: 184: 1013:, thanks for reverting my inadvertent blanking. I'm not sure what I meant to do there, I don't have any recollection of that edit. 889: 840: 234: 92: 85: 17: 129: 1069:
Other than going by different team names, they are not a long-running, historical tag team. They have been an active duo for
428: 121: 73: 1203: 663:
further comments consider whether a redirect/merge to the championship might be a potential alternative to deletion per
1097:
Zero accomplishments? They have won the Tag Team Championship. Winning a championship is an accomplishment... right? --
489: 106: 102: 200: 651: 1228: 1162:
match results. There is a precedent of deleting teams that don't meet GNG, even if they have held championships:
40: 1158:
in order to be notable. This team does not have significant coverage in reliable independent sources other than
1167: 1124:. It is their first title reign and before that they have had little notable success, as shown in the article. 1175: 1052:- like the above said, they've been teaming long before they were the B-team and they've won tag team titles 957: 712:
despite the duo being the then-current and first-ever SmackDown champions. The current info mainly includes
548: 56:
or any policy-based reasons for inclusion, so that leaves us with deletion as really the only option here.
1163: 742: 1224: 1102: 696: 573: 474: 410: 385: 36: 406: 509: 432: 402: 53: 1210: 883: 834: 708:
as nom. Despite being the current champions, there is still insufficient coverage on the team. The
451: 243:
Not notable. Zero accomplishments/championships. Only notability are the two subjects in the team.
220: 1187: 969: 637: 544: 455: 1171: 1159: 985: 961: 860: 810: 713: 625: 578: 569: 562: 526: 494: 244: 81: 60: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1223:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1132: 1117: 1098: 1081: 1018: 1000: 918: 789: 750: 728: 692: 608: 470: 356: 336: 316: 296: 276: 255: 856:"Doubt will happen"? It's 10-4 in favor of keep (as it stands now), so I'd rethink that. 676: 521: 514: 371: 492:, so not exactly a straight forward case. Being a champion doesn't guarentee notability. 784:
The rationale for deletion is that it fails GNG, like a bunch of other similar subjects.
1206: 1040: 877: 869: 828: 438: 1179: 1155: 965: 717: 664: 629: 621: 597: 450:- Have been a long running team, over several iterations and have won the tag titles 857: 807: 57: 159: 1126: 1094: 1075: 1014: 1010: 995: 914: 873: 785: 761: 746: 722: 603: 352: 332: 312: 292: 272: 249: 671: 1036: 624:. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. All coverage is 524:
a pop does not make an article notable. Nor does the amount they are over.
745:
was cited as an example to keep but that article was deleted twice at AfD.
490:
An AfD recently went through for the team they beat for the championships
1120:
Like I said, zero accomplishments and barely any notable coverage
1219:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
654:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
155: 151: 147: 913:. Both non-WWE B-teams are more notable than this one. 219: 670:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 289:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 269:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1231:). No further edits should be made to this page. 347:Note: This discussion has been included in the 327:Note: This discussion has been included in the 307:Note: This discussion has been included in the 287:Note: This discussion has been included in the 267:Note: This discussion has been included in the 52:. None of the keep reasons provide any sort of 349:list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions 309:list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions 233: 8: 329:list of Florida-related deletion discussions 113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 710:Heath Slater and Rhyno article was deleted 400: 346: 326: 306: 286: 266: 868:The page you should consult would be at 825:Glossary of professional wrestling terms 576:. We require them to notable as of now. 1054:2600:1700:AA10:9940:80C8:DF66:BC70:F5BA 691:- They are the Tag Team Champions. -- 7: 1202:Significant coverage in the media. 122:The B-Team (professional wrestling) 74:The B-Team (professional wrestling) 24: 1122:"before winning the championship" 600:, no. All coverage is routine. - 469:per tag team championship reign. 1035::They've been teaming for years. 716:match results and does not meet 98:Introduction to deletion process 1213:) 18:03, 25 July 2018 (GMT +12) 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 989:, 20:30, 23 July 2018, (GMT) 934:per a lot of reasons above. 876:at the pulpit (yes, I'm old). 566:, 15:28, 17 July 2018, (GMT) 518:, 11:30, 17 July 2018, (UTC) 444:12:50, 16 July 2018 (GMT +12) 429:WWE Raw Tag Team Championship 543:Tag Team Champions on Raw-- 375:, 5:23, 15 July 2018, (UTC) 88:(AfD)? Read these primers! 1248: 1193:00:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC) 1168:Kofi Kingston and R-Truth 1138:18:54, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 1107:16:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 1087:04:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 1062:00:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 1045:21:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 1023:22:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 1005:20:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 974:16:52, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 948:05:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 923:06:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC) 895:05:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 864:00:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 846:05:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC) 814:18:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC) 794:06:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 780:05:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 755:05:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC) 734:00:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC) 701:23:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC) 682:17:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC) 643:22:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 613:14:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 585:09:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC) 553:21:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 533:09:06, 18 July 2018 (UTC) 501:10:07, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 479:04:15, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 460:21:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 419:00:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 392:23:38, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 361:14:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 341:14:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 321:14:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 301:14:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 281:14:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 261:14:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 68:07:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC) 1221:Please do not modify it. 1176:Angelina Love and Winter 32:Please do not modify it. 1164:Heath Slater and Rhyno 958:The Deleters of Worlds 743:Heath Slater and Rhyno 992:Striking duplicate - 909:And don't forget the 86:Articles for deletion 433:Extreme Rules (2018) 885:Talk to me, Billy 836:Talk to me, Billy 660:Relisting comment: 1140: 1109: 1025: 684: 421: 405:comment added by 363: 343: 323: 303: 283: 103:Guide to deletion 93:How to contribute 1239: 1135: 1129: 1116: 1093: 1084: 1078: 1009: 998: 946: 943: 938: 892: 886: 880: 843: 837: 831: 778: 775: 770: 765: 731: 725: 669: 657: 655: 606: 581: 529: 497: 443: 390: 386:Hansen Sebastian 258: 252: 238: 237: 223: 175: 163: 145: 83: 65: 34: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1229:deletion review 1133: 1127: 1082: 1076: 996: 945: 942:I didn't do it! 941: 936: 935: 890: 884: 878: 841: 835: 829: 777: 774:I didn't do it! 773: 768: 767: 759: 729: 723: 685: 650: 648: 620:- doesn't meet 604: 579: 527: 495: 435: 382: 256: 250: 180: 171: 136: 120: 117: 80: 77: 61: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1245: 1243: 1234: 1233: 1215: 1214: 1196: 1195: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1111: 1110: 1064: 1047: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 976: 939: 928: 927: 926: 925: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 891:Transmissions 849: 848: 842:Transmissions 817: 816: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 771: 736: 703: 668: 658: 647: 646: 645: 615: 590: 589: 588: 587: 574:WP:CRYSTALBALL 555: 537: 536: 535: 503: 482: 481: 463: 462: 445: 422: 394: 376: 364: 344: 324: 304: 284: 241: 240: 177: 116: 115: 110: 100: 95: 78: 76: 71: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1244: 1232: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1139: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1080: 1079: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 999: 991: 990: 988: 987: 982: 981: 977: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 952: 951: 950: 949: 944: 933: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 906: 905: 896: 893: 887: 881: 875: 871: 867: 866: 865: 862: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 847: 844: 838: 832: 826: 822: 819: 818: 815: 812: 809: 804: 801: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782: 781: 776: 763: 758: 757: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 737: 735: 732: 727: 726: 719: 715: 711: 707: 704: 702: 698: 694: 690: 689:Strongly Keep 687: 686: 683: 680: 679: 675: 674: 666: 661: 656: 653: 644: 641: 640: 636: 633: 632: 627: 623: 619: 616: 614: 611: 610: 609: 607: 599: 595: 592: 591: 586: 583: 582: 575: 571: 568: 567: 565: 564: 559: 558:Strongly Keep 556: 554: 550: 546: 545:TheGoldenRule 541: 538: 534: 531: 530: 523: 520: 519: 517: 516: 511: 510:Extreme Rules 507: 504: 502: 499: 498: 491: 487: 484: 483: 480: 476: 472: 468: 465: 464: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448:Strongly Keep 446: 442: 441: 440: 434: 430: 426: 425:Strongly Keep 423: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 398: 395: 393: 389: 388: 387: 380: 377: 374: 373: 368: 365: 362: 358: 354: 350: 345: 342: 338: 334: 330: 325: 322: 318: 314: 310: 305: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 254: 253: 246: 236: 232: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 186: 183: 182:Find sources: 178: 174: 170: 167: 161: 157: 153: 149: 144: 140: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 114: 111: 108: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 87: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 66: 64: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1220: 1218: 1199: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1151: 1125: 1121: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1049: 1032: 997:Galatz גאליץ 994: 993: 986:Pokkeballs17 984: 979: 978: 953: 931: 929: 820: 802: 738: 721: 705: 688: 677: 672: 659: 649: 638: 634: 630: 617: 605:Galatz גאליץ 602: 601: 593: 580:Lee Vilenski 577: 570:Pokkeballs17 563:Pokkeballs17 561: 557: 539: 528:Lee Vilenski 525: 513: 505: 496:Lee Vilenski 493: 485: 466: 447: 437: 436: 424: 401:— Preceding 396: 384: 383: 378: 370: 366: 248: 242: 230: 224: 216: 209: 203: 197: 191: 181: 168: 79: 62: 49: 47: 31: 28: 1118:TheVaughano 1099:TheVaughano 980:Speedy Keep 874:Flip Wilson 693:TheVaughano 467:Speedy Keep 407:TurnerMagic 397:Speedy Keep 207:free images 1160:WP:ROUTINE 962:WP:TOOSOON 911:nWo B-Team 879:RadioKAOS 830:RadioKAOS 714:WP:ROUTINE 626:WP:ROUTINE 522:Ducktech89 515:Ducktech89 427:- won the 372:Ducktech89 245:WP:TOOSOON 54:notability 1225:talk page 1207:Krishfiji 439:Krishfiji 37:talk page 1227:or in a 1204:see here 1172:Air Boom 966:JJClbsnn 937:Mr. C.C. 769:Mr. C.C. 652:Relisted 452:AM Woody 415:contribs 403:unsigned 166:View log 107:glossary 39:or in a 1178:, etc. 1152:Comment 1067:Comment 870:WP:VOTE 858:Vjmlhds 821:Comment 808:Vjmlhds 506:Comment 486:Comment 213:WP refs 201:scholar 139:protect 134:history 84:New to 1156:WP:GNG 1134:(talk) 1128:Sekyaw 1095:Sekyaw 1083:(talk) 1077:Sekyaw 1015:LM2000 1011:Galatz 954:Delete 915:LM2000 861:(talk) 811:(talk) 786:LM2000 762:LM2000 747:LM2000 739:Delete 730:(talk) 724:Sekyaw 718:WP:GNG 706:Delete 665:WP:ATD 622:WP:GNG 618:Delete 598:WP:GNG 594:Delete 572:. See 542:=: --> 353:Hhkohh 333:Hhkohh 313:Hhkohh 293:Hhkohh 273:Hhkohh 257:(talk) 251:Sekyaw 185:Google 143:delete 50:delete 1181:Nikki 631:Nikki 228:JSTOR 189:books 173:Stats 160:views 152:watch 148:links 16:< 1211:talk 1200:Keep 1103:talk 1058:talk 1050:Keep 1041:talk 1037:Muur 1033:Keep 1019:talk 970:talk 932:Keep 919:talk 803:Keep 790:talk 751:talk 697:talk 549:talk 540:Keep 512:. -- 475:talk 471:RF23 456:talk 411:talk 379:Keep 367:Keep 357:talk 337:talk 317:talk 297:talk 277:talk 221:FENS 195:news 156:logs 130:talk 126:edit 58:ansh 1189:311 1071:one 678:Why 639:311 431:at 235:TWL 164:– ( 63:666 1174:, 1170:, 1166:, 1105:) 1060:) 1043:) 1021:) 972:) 964:. 921:) 792:) 753:) 720:. 699:) 673:So 628:. 551:) 477:) 458:) 417:) 413:• 359:) 351:. 339:) 331:. 319:) 311:. 299:) 291:. 279:) 271:. 247:. 215:) 158:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 1209:( 1185:♥ 1101:( 1056:( 1039:( 1017:( 968:( 930:' 917:( 888:/ 882:/ 839:/ 833:/ 788:( 764:: 760:@ 749:( 695:( 667:. 635:♥ 547:( 473:( 454:( 409:( 355:( 335:( 315:( 295:( 275:( 239:) 231:· 225:· 217:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 187:( 179:( 176:) 169:· 162:) 124:( 109:) 105:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
notability
ansh
666
07:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
The B-Team (professional wrestling)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
The B-Team (professional wrestling)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.