458:
A book is notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria: 1. The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as
308:
I guess I should have checked more thoroughly before deeming this book "non-notable". I agree that this article could be reworked and expanded with reliable sources, then (I notice you've already begun doing so). Don't know if I can "retract" a deletion request but I now also support keeping the
488:
but I think we can agree that it'd be odd to have a completely separate article for this book. The point is, just because someone talked about it doesn't mean it deserves a separate article. These are just guidelines, and it was not intended to apply to every possible scenario foreseeable or
459:
newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
199:
478:
546:
into the
Walking With... article. The book was written as a companion to that series (I have both watched the series and have/read the book), and I don't see how it can be adequately treated separately from
230:
Unsourced; non-notable encyclopedia associated with a series of nature documentaries, there is nothing to suggest that this book in particular is independently notable enough to warrant its own article.
193:
133:
128:
137:
120:
160:
248:
124:
107:
92:
214:
181:
499:
article as is done right now is best, as I don't see how you could have a full-fledged article unless you add a lot of padding and page-filler
116:
68:
598:
577:
556:
530:
509:
471:
429:
411:
394:
377:
318:
292:
260:
240:
62:
484:
175:
462:
The book easily satisfies this, as indicated by reviews noted above, and therefore is notable enough to have a stand alone article.
171:
60:
87:
80:
17:
221:
365:
357:
453:
101:
97:
187:
615:
594:
40:
505:
490:
425:
314:
236:
493:), so at the end of the day, you have to go with the most practical. In this case, a small discussion on the
419:
it's a companion book to the series, so it doesn't make any sense to split it off into a stand-alone article
573:
552:
486:
373:
526:
495:
467:
341:
288:
349:
611:
280:
36:
568:. Accompanies notable programs too. Old-time classic by now, and I wouldn't mind having a copy either.
590:
58:
52:. Views are split about evenly between keeping and merging; neither of which requires any deletion.
516:
501:
447:
421:
390:
310:
256:
232:
207:
569:
548:
407:
369:
522:
463:
303:
284:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
610:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
476:
I mean if you're just gonna go off of that, I can say that about a lot of random books, like
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
521:
I think that looks like a notable book, so I have gone ahead and created an article for it.
586:
565:
331:
53:
386:
276:
272:
252:
589:
is reformatted to be more than just a list, than maybe a merge would be appropriate.
440:
403:
336:
154:
482:
479:
The
Hunters or the Hunted?: An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy
606:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
150:
146:
142:
206:
334:, in addition to the reviews above, also reviewed by
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
618:). No further edits should be made to this page.
247:Note: This discussion has been included in the
456:
249:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
220:
8:
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
246:
117:The Complete Guide to Prehistoric Life
69:The Complete Guide to Prehistoric Life
402:- into the article about the series.
7:
24:
489:otherwise (which is why we have
93:Introduction to deletion process
273:The Quarterly Review of Biology
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
599:00:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
578:05:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
557:18:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
531:01:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
510:00:04, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
472:21:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
454:Knowledge:Notability (books)
430:21:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
412:21:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
395:16:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
378:12:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
319:08:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
293:23:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
281:Canadian Review of Materials
261:22:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
241:22:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
63:20:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
277:Palaeontologica Electronica
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
635:
608:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
496:Walking with Dinosaurs
461:
587:Walking with...#Books
385:per reviews found. —
81:Articles for deletion
564:This clearly meets
502:User:Dunkleosteus77
422:User:Dunkleosteus77
491:WP:IGNOREALLRULES
263:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
626:
520:
508:
451:
444:
428:
307:
225:
224:
210:
158:
140:
78:
34:
634:
633:
629:
628:
627:
625:
624:
623:
622:
616:deletion review
591:Devonian Wombat
514:
500:
445:
438:
420:
346:Science Teacher
301:
167:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
632:
630:
621:
620:
602:
601:
580:
559:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
517:Dunkleosteus77
448:Dunkleosteus77
433:
432:
414:
397:
380:
362:Resource Links
324:
323:
322:
321:
311:Ichthyovenator
296:
295:
265:
264:
233:Ichthyovenator
228:
227:
164:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
631:
619:
617:
613:
609:
604:
603:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
581:
579:
575:
571:
570:Ambrosiawater
567:
563:
560:
558:
554:
550:
549:SilverTiger12
545:
542:
541:
532:
528:
524:
518:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
498:
497:
492:
487:
485:
483:
481:
480:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
460:
455:
449:
442:
437:
436:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
370:Coolabahapple
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:Science Scope
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:New Scientist
333:
329:
326:
325:
320:
316:
312:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
223:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
173:
170:
169:Find sources:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
607:
605:
585:for now, if
582:
561:
543:
523:Hemiauchenia
506:push to talk
494:
477:
464:Hemiauchenia
457:
426:push to talk
416:
399:
382:
361:
353:
345:
335:
327:
304:Hemiauchenia
285:Hemiauchenia
271:Reviewed in
268:
229:
217:
211:
203:
196:
190:
184:
178:
168:
74:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
366:listed here
358:listed here
350:review here
342:listed here
194:free images
55:Ritchie333
612:talk page
387:Toughpigs
309:article.
253:Shellwood
37:talk page
614:or in a
566:WP:NBOOK
441:FunkMonk
404:FunkMonk
332:WP:NBOOK
330:, meets
279:and the
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
200:WP refs
188:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
172:Google
138:delete
547:it.--
544:Merge
417:Merge
400:Merge
215:JSTOR
176:books
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
595:talk
583:Keep
574:talk
562:Keep
553:talk
527:talk
468:talk
452:Per
408:talk
391:talk
383:Keep
374:talk
328:Keep
315:talk
289:talk
269:Keep
257:talk
237:talk
208:FENS
182:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
368:).
360:),
352:),
344:),
222:TWL
159:– (
597:)
576:)
555:)
529:)
470:)
410:)
393:)
376:)
317:)
291:)
283:.
275:,
259:)
251:.
239:)
202:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
593:(
572:(
551:(
525:(
519::
515:@
504:|
466:(
450::
446:@
443::
439:@
424:|
406:(
389:(
372:(
364:(
356:(
348:(
340:(
313:(
306::
302:@
287:(
255:(
235:(
226:)
218:·
212:·
204:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
174:(
166:(
163:)
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.