658:
old foundation inaugurated by the
President of the Pakistan, funded by a company with a turnover of $ 1.6 billion in 2020....10 minutes of BEFORE reveals that information. No doubt the article needs clean up, but that is not the point of AfD. More than adequate sourcing in the article to meet the GNG. Regards, --
657:
is more appropriate. Whether an article has been refbombed has nothing to do with notability; it *may* suggest an attempt to subvert notability requirements, but we assume good faith first and foremost, especially in a case like this (ie a non-profit, philanthropic organisation). This is a 60 year
385:
after initially questioned and tagged as advertisement and missing neutrality but then fulfilled all demands. Not have something about this organisation would be an unnecessary loss of rare but relevant information. There are not many entries about such organisations in
Pakistan available on
584:
It seems that you are pulling out the wrong guideline. My only concern is whether the subject having significant coverage from these newspapers. Having plenty of routine coverage from all the major publications doesnt merit a topic or subject its own standalone article.
470:. One of the questions asked by the interviewer was about the Foundation, and the interviewee gave a lengthy response. The interviewer merely asking about the Foundation's activities cements its notability in major news agencies.
208:
318:
Granted, the article has a more than a few citation problems, but there are enough to establish WP:GNG. While there are a few questionable sources, the article hosts sources from many reputable news agencies, including
169:
267:
202:
291:
453:
591:
544:
519:
421:
362:
300:
276:
252:
116:
101:
142:
137:
146:
605:
586:
533:
514:
435:
416:
357:
295:
271:
247:
129:
381:
this article, it has many contributors and is well integrated into more cohesive information about
Pakistan. The article was reviewed by
570:
Is it acceptable now for someone to bring an article to this AfD with so many references from almost all major newspapers of
Pakistan?
506:
The second one is talking entirely about something different and merely has the mention about the subject in a paragraph. Kindly read
503:
The first one doesnt seem fine to me. I've no idea abou the reliability of Devex. But it is basically written like an advertisement.
223:
190:
631:
Since I SDed this originally I've been asked to comment here. I have no strong views on whether it's kept in its current state
96:
89:
17:
545:
https://dailytimes.com.pk/798743/the-dawood-foundation-and-wwf-pakistan-host-a-webinar-on-the-effects-of-climate-crisis/
184:
110:
106:
688:
667:
645:
619:
598:
579:
560:
526:
484:
428:
395:
369:
340:
307:
283:
259:
71:
133:
541:
I am sorry about the other 2, I think I may have copy pasted the wrong URL. I have posted the correct links below.
180:
707:
386:
Knowledge. Why not changing or reformulating what disturbs instead of the total destructive way to deleting it?--
40:
230:
615:
556:
480:
457:
336:
328:
324:
703:
125:
77:
36:
443:
610:
I provided you the three articles already. Could you kindly accept the notability of the article now?
663:
450:
is by far the best source in the article. The entire page is about TDF and the publisher is reliable.
653:
It's inappropriate to insist on application of ORGDEPTH here, this is a philanthropic organisation,
676:
654:
638:
216:
196:
53:
575:
513:
The last one is a routine coverage about some other incident. It is also not enough to pass GNG.
507:
408:
353:
352:: All these reputed sources only gives routine coverage to the organisation. It fails to satisfy
684:
611:
552:
497:
476:
332:
240:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
702:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
403:: The article being marked as reviewed does not mean it shouldnt be nominated for deletion.
391:
66:
659:
467:
412:
320:
632:
405:
There are not many entries about such organisations in
Pakistan available on Knowledge.
382:
571:
244:
680:
163:
387:
57:
538:
Devex is a news agency focusing on organizations founded over 20 years ago.
549:
463:
447:
407:. This is not a valid keep argument. The subject fails to satisfy
696:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
460:
contains 1 paragraph about the
Foundation and its activities.
331:. It is very unreasonable to dispute this articles sourcing.
159:
155:
151:
215:
243:. Sources are routine and mostly unreliable. Fails
411:. I will withdraw my nom if someone comes up with
268:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
710:). No further edits should be made to this page.
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
500:, Im afraid that I cant agree with you on this.
292:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
289:
265:
440:I will provide you 3 suitable sources:
7:
24:
606:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla
550:https://www.dawn.com/news/1216343
534:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla
436:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla
102:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
620:23:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
599:20:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
580:19:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
561:21:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
527:20:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
485:20:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
429:19:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
396:17:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
370:19:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
341:00:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
308:21:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
284:21:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
260:21:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
475:I hope you agree with this.
689:16:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
668:13:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
646:06:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
72:05:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
727:
466:is an interview piece by
699:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
325:The News International
126:The Dawood Foundation
90:Articles for deletion
78:The Dawood Foundation
594:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
522:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
424:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
365:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
303:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
279:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
255:(เดชเดฟเดณเตเดณเตเดเตเดเดจเตเดเต เดชเดฑ)
310:
286:
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
718:
701:
643:
609:
596:
537:
524:
439:
426:
367:
305:
281:
257:
239:Article is well
234:
233:
219:
167:
149:
87:
64:
34:
726:
725:
721:
720:
719:
717:
716:
715:
714:
708:deletion review
697:
639:
603:
592:
531:
520:
433:
422:
363:
301:
277:
253:
176:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
724:
722:
713:
712:
692:
691:
670:
648:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
565:
564:
563:
547:
542:
539:
511:
504:
501:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
473:
472:
471:
461:
451:
383:User:John B123
375:
374:
373:
372:
344:
343:
312:
311:
287:
237:
236:
173:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
723:
711:
709:
705:
700:
694:
693:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
671:
669:
665:
661:
656:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
636:
635:
630:
627:
621:
617:
613:
607:
602:
601:
600:
597:
595:
590:
589:
583:
582:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
548:
546:
543:
540:
535:
530:
529:
528:
525:
523:
518:
517:
512:
509:
505:
502:
499:
495:
492:
486:
482:
478:
474:
469:
465:
462:
459:
455:
452:
449:
445:
442:
441:
437:
432:
431:
430:
427:
425:
420:
419:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
384:
380:
377:
376:
371:
368:
366:
361:
360:
355:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
314:
313:
309:
306:
304:
299:
298:
293:
288:
285:
282:
280:
275:
274:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
256:
251:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
70:
69:
65:
63:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
698:
695:
677:WP:NONPROFIT
672:
655:WP:NONPROFIT
650:
640:
633:
628:
612:RealKnockout
593:
587:
567:
553:RealKnockout
521:
515:
498:RealKnockout
493:
477:RealKnockout
464:This article
444:This article
423:
417:
404:
400:
378:
364:
358:
349:
333:RealKnockout
315:
302:
296:
278:
272:
254:
248:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
83:
67:
60:
59:
54:WP:NONPROFIT
49:
47:
31:
28:
641:talk to me?
508:WP:ORGDEPTH
458:Daily Times
409:WP:ORGDEPTH
354:WP:ORGDEPTH
329:Daily Times
203:free images
660:Goldsztajn
327:, and the
704:talk page
675:. Passes
634:Jimfbleak
588:Pillechan
516:Pillechan
418:Pillechan
359:Pillechan
297:Pillechan
273:Pillechan
249:Pillechan
241:REFBOMBED
37:talk page
706:or in a
572:Ngrewal1
413:WP:THREE
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
681:4meter4
629:Comment
496::Hello
456:by the
454:article
401:Comment
350:Comment
209:WPย refs
197:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
388:Crosji
245:WP:GNG
181:Google
147:delete
61:BD2412
52:, per
494:Reply
448:Devex
224:JSTOR
185:books
164:views
156:watch
152:links
16:<
685:talk
673:Keep
664:talk
651:Keep
616:talk
576:talk
568:Keep
557:talk
481:talk
468:Dawn
392:talk
379:Keep
337:talk
321:Dawn
316:Keep
217:FENS
191:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
50:keep
446:by
231:TWL
168:โ (
687:)
666:)
637:-
618:)
578:)
559:)
483:)
415:.
394:)
356:.
339:)
323:,
294:.
270:.
211:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
56:.
683:(
679:.
662:(
614:(
608::
604:@
574:(
555:(
536::
532:@
510:.
479:(
438::
434:@
390:(
335:(
235:)
227:ยท
221:ยท
213:ยท
206:ยท
200:ยท
194:ยท
188:ยท
183:(
175:(
172:)
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
68:T
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.