764:
noteworthy. A book exists, but the cited source does not link it in any way to the film, except in a customer review, which isn't a reliable source. A film does not become notable simply by virtue of its cast. Verifiability, mere existence, of three components does not achieve notability, like it was some product of alchemy, where a combination of the mundane produces gold.
613:
linkage should not be assumed simply from chronology. The book art is different from the film art (atypical when there is direct linkage) and the only place the Amazon entry mentions the film is in one customer review, where it says the compiler's work on the film 'inspired' the book, which is not the same as it being "a companion book". Customer reviews are
744:
The "guy on his own website" is a notable reviewer cited often on
Knowledge. The soundtrack exists, as does the book which includes articles by many noted American Civil War scholars, and the film seems to have included many actors and research institutions. The combined book, album, and story of the
725:
Praised as such by some guy on his own web site. That is worth the square root Sweet Fanny Adams. Simple existence does not equate with notability, no matter how many stars an Amazon customer or a self-published blog give it. We only have evidence that two people have ever listed to this soundtrack.
612:
The book section draws repeatedly on the fact that this book is associated with the film, but I see no evidence on the sole source (the Amazon page) that this is the case. Yes, it is edited by the same person who made the film, but scholars often publish related works that aren't directly linked, and
873:
might be split with a new heading
Centennaries, covering President Kennedy's speech and the 150 year events. The book, which is already mentioned, is clearly a notable aspect of that; the film soundtrack and unreleased film are probably less significant, but could be mentioned, with a full archival
763:
A lot of web sites are cited on
Knowledge that shouldn't be, so I find 'other pages cite his blog' unpersuasive. Except for certain very-specific exceptions, self-published material is not WP:RS. That the soundtrack exists is not being questioned. That doesn't make it notable, or even necessarily
597:
At this point, the entire section on the book is sourced to Amazon sales pages for it. If you want to make a claim that the book is notable, you'll have to find a better source than that. The soundtrack is sourced to Amazon sales page and a three-word quote from a self-published blog post. These are
307:
for now, see if this AfD shakes their tree a bit and gets an answer about why the film isn't being released. From the text and sources the film has major stars in voice-over roles, has released a soundtrack, and includes rare access from institutions holding documents about the topic. An interesting
567:
There is no sign that either the book or the soundtrack is of sufficient notability to support their own articles. We do not have articles for every book or every CD that exists.... and that goes moreso for student films that look like they will never be released. That you would like to see such a
518:
The
Cornell University piece is not a third-party source, it's six sentences talking about their involvement in the making of this supposed film. Look at it this way: What impact does the film's existence have? What import does it have? Since the film does not exist, and it has not built anyone's
340:
I left a note at the main editor's talk page asking them (if they are related to the film) the why's of non-release, and suggesting youtube as a possible route. Truly odd that the creators of the film were able to get all of those major and minor stars to participate in the documentary, create a
582:
The point is that the book has been published and is sourced on the page, the album has been made and distributed and is sourced on the page, and the film seems to have been created with the direct assistance of many cultural institutions and many big-name actors and is sourced on the page. The
617:
reliable sources anyhow, so we have absolutely zero reliable evidence of linkage. That same review is the only place that James McPherson is named anywhere on that Amazon page, and only to say that the editor consulted with McPherson (among a long list of consulting scholars). The quote from
251:
has not been updated in over two. A soundtrack was released four years ago (to little attention - Amazon has one review), and also a book of essays on the address that was supposed to be a tie-in. Once one gets beyond the 2013 "look, a father and son are making a movie" piece
375:
to the top as the main topic of the page and give it a good edit. We can then tell the interesting story of the "where-is-it?" documentary as a good-sized section of the soundtrack page. And have one of the coolest names on the encyclopedia.
209:
545:(sourced), both covered in the article. Either the album or the book could be the stand-alone subject of the page, which combines all of the related topics. What adds to this film's notability are the quality of
788:
583:
Gettysburg
Address is notable, the academic book about the address is notable, the musical presentation of the era seems exhaustive of its topic, and the page is a complete package about the project.
896:, which is mentioned in the body of the text. If this book is particularly notable among the dozens of books which have been published on the address, the notability would have to be shown. --
203:
553:
and
Cornell cites, and the amount of detail present, the page covers a unique and important subject. I personally would like to see the film, and await its eventual public release.
341:
soundtrack, and then leave it unreleased. I will change my "Keep" if more isn't forthcoming, or if the mystery isn't cleared up in a few days. Who doesn't like a good mystery!
162:
326:
It's a curious assumption that a student documentary without a distributor or an experienced production company would be released unless there's a reason for it not to be. --
135:
130:
139:
666:
253:
122:
874:
reference for where the film is deposited. I note that most of the film actors have articles, but the film itself almost sounds like a NN student project.
646:
284:
169:
109:
94:
243:
Promo page for an unreleased student film. No sign of release impending, no distributor connected, no production company that has ever released a film.
844:
No refs other than that it exists. Basically an advertisement. Article didn't make it 90 days before it was challenged, and has been ever since.
224:
191:
549:
as well as the seemingly unprecedented access to papers, manuscripts, and other historical remnants of the
Gettysburg Address. With the
707:
A ripple is all that's needed for notability, especially as this album has been praised for its coverage of
American Civil War music.
185:
827:
per
Slatersteven, plus mere existence is insufficient for notability, even if it combines three related items that merely exist.
905:
883:
853:
836:
816:
800:
773:
754:
735:
716:
698:
678:
658:
627:
607:
592:
577:
562:
528:
509:
485:
443:
429:
407:
385:
350:
335:
317:
296:
276:
89:
82:
64:
17:
181:
497:
412:
You mean one five-star customer rating at Amazon doesn't clear the notability bar? It's a start. Although self-published,
365:
231:
126:
434:
And even if you were to clear that, what you have is a single three-paragraph review, not enough to meet notability. --
103:
99:
500:, and the other cites on the page seem to be enough to show notability, verifiability, and to keep the page around.
546:
542:
538:
458:
372:
118:
70:
924:
40:
197:
398:
criteria? At the moment, we have it sourced to a sales page and to a review that's a self-published source. --
879:
694:
420:. The bar is still raised higher than that unless Tillness is established as a reviewer in other sources.
920:
849:
481:
36:
901:
812:
796:
750:
712:
674:
654:
603:
588:
573:
558:
524:
505:
439:
425:
403:
381:
346:
331:
313:
292:
272:
689:
unreleased film that violates
Crystal ball, and an unremarkable album that has barley made a ripple.
832:
769:
731:
623:
217:
875:
870:
866:
261:
690:
395:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
919:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
845:
477:
265:
897:
808:
792:
746:
708:
670:
650:
599:
584:
569:
554:
520:
501:
435:
421:
399:
377:
342:
327:
309:
288:
268:
892:
This book is only mentioned on the speech's page as a reference; there was another book,
533:
The film obviously either exists in production, and is covered in the reliable sources (
308:
situation, and could be considered notable as a major but completed unreleased artwork.
247:
that IMDb lists as the film's official website has not been updated in over four years,
828:
765:
727:
619:
537:, the Cornell article, and the other mentions), and what has come from it so far is an
55:
470:
240:
618:
McPherson praising the book appears nowhere (maybe the page was different in 2017).
156:
257:
264:
from the hometown paper.) Nothing else other than passing mentions found via
244:
745:
film's creation make this a keepable article in terms of verifiability.
248:
52:. Note: Delete and merge is not possible for reasons of attribution.
915:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
789:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
461:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
260:, as the student involved is one of their students, and
417:
413:
152:
148:
144:
216:
364:
instead of deleting, we change the article's name to
416:
be used as a source quite a bit on Knowledge, as is
476:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
807:At the WikiProject Military history page as well.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
927:). No further edits should be made to this page.
787:Note: This discussion has been included in the
665:Note: This discussion has been included in the
645:Note: This discussion has been included in the
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
230:
8:
667:list of History-related deletion discussions
469:I am singularly unimpressed by the level of
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
543:a book published by Oxford University Press
786:
664:
644:
282:
647:list of Film-related deletion discussions
394:In what way does the soundtrack meet the
285:list of Arts-related deletion discussions
568:film were it to exist is irrelevant. --
519:career, the answer is clearly none. --
7:
258:University of New Hampshire article
869:itself is exceptionally notable.
24:
539:an album (which exists, sourced)
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
256:, sources are weak (there's a
1:
906:16:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
884:16:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
854:04:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
837:18:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
817:16:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
801:15:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
774:18:49, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
755:18:09, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
736:18:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
717:16:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
699:15:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
679:15:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
659:15:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
628:18:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
608:15:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
593:15:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
578:15:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
563:10:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
529:06:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
510:04:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
486:03:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
444:20:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
430:20:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
408:20:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
386:20:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
351:16:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
336:16:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
318:16:34, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
297:16:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
277:16:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
119:The Gettysburg Address (film)
71:The Gettysburg Address (film)
262:similar "local boy" coverage
65:12:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
598:not signs of notability. --
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
944:
498:Cornell University article
871:Gettysburg Address#Legacy
547:the voice actors involved
917:Please do not modify it.
414:Soundtrack Geek seems to
32:Please do not modify it.
473:based discussion above.
373:the soundtrack section
367:The Gettysburg Address
418:reviewer Jørn Tillnes
83:Articles for deletion
894:Gettysburg Responses
867:Gettysburg Address
467:Relisting comment:
819:
803:
681:
661:
488:
299:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
935:
806:
475:
464:
462:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
943:
942:
938:
937:
936:
934:
933:
932:
931:
925:deletion review
489:
457:
455:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
941:
939:
930:
929:
911:
910:
909:
908:
887:
886:
856:
839:
821:
820:
804:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
758:
757:
739:
738:
720:
719:
702:
701:
683:
682:
662:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
513:
512:
474:
465:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
389:
388:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
321:
320:
301:
300:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
940:
928:
926:
922:
918:
913:
912:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
890:
889:
888:
885:
881:
877:
876:Peterkingiron
872:
868:
864:
863:merge briefly
860:
857:
855:
851:
847:
843:
840:
838:
834:
830:
826:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
805:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
775:
771:
767:
762:
761:
760:
759:
756:
752:
748:
743:
742:
741:
740:
737:
733:
729:
724:
723:
722:
721:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
703:
700:
696:
692:
688:
685:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
663:
660:
656:
652:
648:
643:
629:
625:
621:
616:
611:
610:
609:
605:
601:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
531:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
515:
514:
511:
507:
503:
499:
496:article, the
495:
491:
490:
487:
483:
479:
472:
468:
463:
460:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
374:
370:
368:
363:
360:
359:
352:
348:
344:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
322:
319:
315:
311:
306:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
246:
245:Facebook page
242:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
916:
914:
893:
862:
858:
841:
824:
691:Slatersteven
686:
614:
551:Boston Globe
550:
535:Boston Globe
534:
494:Boston Globe
493:
466:
456:
369:(soundtrack)
366:
361:
304:
254:in the Globe
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
898:Nat Gertler
846:Sammy D III
793:Nat Gertler
671:Nat Gertler
651:Nat Gertler
600:Nat Gertler
570:Nat Gertler
521:Nat Gertler
478:Ad Orientem
436:Nat Gertler
400:Nat Gertler
328:Nat Gertler
289:Nat Gertler
269:Nat Gertler
249:IMDb itself
204:free images
861:film, but
809:Randy Kryn
747:Randy Kryn
709:Randy Kryn
585:Randy Kryn
555:Randy Kryn
502:Randy Kryn
422:Randy Kryn
396:WP:NALBUMS
378:Randy Kryn
371:by moving
362:How about,
343:Randy Kryn
310:Randy Kryn
58:Sandstein
921:talk page
829:Agricolae
766:Agricolae
728:Agricolae
620:Agricolae
266:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
923:or in a
459:Relisted
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
859:Delete
842:Delete
825:Delete
687:Delete
471:WP:PAG
241:WP:NFF
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
902:talk
880:talk
850:talk
833:talk
813:talk
797:talk
770:talk
751:talk
732:talk
713:talk
695:talk
675:talk
655:talk
624:talk
604:talk
589:talk
574:talk
559:talk
541:and
525:talk
506:talk
492:The
482:talk
440:talk
426:talk
404:talk
382:talk
347:talk
332:talk
314:talk
305:Keep
293:talk
273:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
865:.
615:not
232:TWL
161:– (
904:)
882:)
852:)
835:)
815:)
799:)
791:.
772:)
753:)
734:)
715:)
697:)
677:)
669:.
657:)
649:.
626:)
606:)
591:)
576:)
561:)
527:)
508:)
484:)
442:)
428:)
406:)
384:)
349:)
334:)
316:)
295:)
287:.
275:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
900:(
878:(
848:(
831:(
811:(
795:(
768:(
749:(
730:(
711:(
693:(
673:(
653:(
622:(
602:(
587:(
572:(
557:(
523:(
504:(
480:(
438:(
424:(
402:(
380:(
345:(
330:(
312:(
291:(
271:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.