52:. Ignoring a number of 'keep' !votes which had no policy basis whatsoever, we are left with a discussion around NCORP v GNG and then an evaluation of sources. HighKing correctly notes that NCORP is the key guideline to be referenced in this discussion, per my understanding of policy and current practice. At that point, I need to weigh up the argument about the sourcing...and once again I find HighKing's argument the most persuasive. This is a close-run thing and, like all close-run things, it may change in the future if there are new sources that pop up - so this close definitely isn't precluding a recreation if appropriate sources appear.
506:. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. They're all based on company announcements and/or interviews and have zero in-depth information on the company (that wasn't provided by the company) - these cannot be used to establish notability. Having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails
560:: I'm not sold that I've done a thorough news search, because it's proving somewhat difficult to distinguish news about this and news about the unrelated Green Bus Fund. But I'm not coming up with much of substance. Willing to be proven wrong.
412:
Diificult to find refs as company name has been used by 3 UK companies, one in India and 1 in
Singapore. However added more refs including High Court case. With OneRoute award, a national award in the bus industry, I think this meets
489:
Meeting BASIC and/or GNG is irrelevant - this is a company and the appropriate guidelines are NCORP. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of
364:
As
Birmingham Mail is sold across the West Midlands, and the articles appear on Birmingham Live, which is read by over 9m a month, I think they count as regional not local news and so therefore can be counted as per
198:
274:
159:
254:
294:
192:
91:
106:
504:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
318:
86:
79:
17:
132:
127:
136:
320:
119:
213:
100:
96:
180:
525:
418:
373:
586:
40:
346:
As I’ve pointed out in the nomination, subjects that are only covered in local news aren’t good enough for NCORP per
174:
477:
414:
369:
322:
569:
565:
550:
516:
481:
460:
443:
422:
404:
377:
359:
337:
306:
286:
266:
246:
170:
61:
495:
582:
545:
437:
123:
36:
400:
220:
452:
456:
206:
115:
67:
499:
491:
473:
507:
433:
234:
561:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
581:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
541:
355:
302:
282:
262:
242:
57:
469:
392:
366:
347:
230:
186:
396:
502:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include
325:
511:
536:
Relisting to allow discussion of the provided sources vis-a-vis NCORP specifically.
153:
351:
298:
278:
258:
238:
53:
577:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
528:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
317:
as per sources in the article as well as these sources:
149:
145:
141:
205:
539:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
275:
219:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
589:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:. Certainly notable and certainly meets BASIC. –
293:Note: This discussion has been included in the
273:Note: This discussion has been included in the
253:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
451:, needs some work, but not reason to delete.
8:
295:list of England-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
292:
272:
252:
498:and (this bit is important!) containing
229:No coverage outside of local news (see
496:in-depth information *on the company*
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
391:a notable bus company. passes
1:
570:03:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
551:23:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
517:22:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
482:02:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
461:05:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
444:09:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
423:08:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
405:05:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
378:10:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
360:03:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
338:01:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
307:23:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
287:23:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
267:23:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
247:23:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
606:
62:14:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
579:Please do not modify it.
468:Seems to be notable per
32:Please do not modify it.
500:"Independent Content"
80:Articles for deletion
492:significant coverage
534:Relisting comment:
432:per nom. It's not
415:Davidstewartharvey
370:Davidstewartharvey
553:
309:
289:
269:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
597:
549:
538:
531:
529:
335:
330:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
605:
604:
600:
599:
598:
596:
595:
594:
593:
587:deletion review
554:
540:
524:
522:
331:
326:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
603:
601:
592:
591:
573:
572:
537:
532:
521:
520:
519:
484:
463:
446:
426:
425:
407:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
341:
340:
311:
310:
290:
270:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
602:
590:
588:
584:
580:
575:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
556:
555:
552:
547:
543:
535:
530:
527:
518:
515:
514:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
488:
485:
483:
479:
475:
474:Expertwikiguy
471:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
438:AnotherEditor
435:
431:
428:
427:
424:
420:
416:
411:
408:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
386:
379:
375:
371:
368:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
339:
336:
334:
329:
323:
321:
319:
316:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:The Green Bus
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
68:The Green Bus
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
578:
576:
562:Gnomingstuff
557:
533:
523:
512:
503:
486:
465:
448:
439:
429:
409:
388:
332:
327:
314:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
558:Weak delete
413:notability.
193:free images
397:DoctorsHub
233:) - fails
583:talk page
542:Vanamonde
453:Lilporchy
37:talk page
585:or in a
526:Relisted
513:HighKing
508:WP:NCORP
235:WP:NCORP
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
434:notable
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
487:Delete
470:WP:GNG
430:Delete
393:WP:GNG
367:WP:AUD
352:SK2242
348:WP:AUD
299:SK2242
279:SK2242
259:SK2242
239:SK2242
231:WP:AUD
171:Google
137:delete
54:Daniel
50:delete
494:with
328:Davey
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
566:talk
546:Talk
478:talk
466:Keep
457:talk
449:Keep
419:talk
410:Keep
401:talk
389:Keep
374:talk
356:talk
333:2010
315:Keep
303:talk
283:talk
263:talk
243:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
440:144
221:TWL
158:– (
568:)
510:.
480:)
472:.
459:)
436:.
421:)
403:)
395:.
376:)
358:)
350:.
305:)
297:.
285:)
277:.
265:)
257:.
245:)
237:.
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
564:(
548:)
544:(
476:(
455:(
417:(
399:(
372:(
354:(
301:(
281:(
261:(
241:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.