553:. Garmendia's congressman read the tribute on the floor. There was no vote or anything formal like that; just a routine reading of something into the record by a member. Probably to a chamber that was empty except for the clerks. These things are routine and are done as a service and a courtesy to constituents. That same day, a volunteer arts organization was recognized for their 45th anniversary, a junior high school social studies teacher was recognized for having won a fellowship, a member read into the record their monthly newsletter on foreign affairs, and the 50th anniversary of George C. Marshall's commencement address at Harvard was noted. In any case, this is
374:. The NY Times article is pretty good (even if it's more about James P. Broderick than about The Hope Line), but that's the best of the bunch. One of the refs is just a link to a photo??? The BronxNet ref is a classic passing reference; it just mentions The Hope Line in a list of agencies. I don't have access to Disaster Psychiatry so can't say anything about that. The Bishop Garmendia reference is a page on the founder's own website, so not independent. The Bronx Free Press story is questionable. As far as I can tell, this is a blog post, so probably not a
378:. The nonprofitlight.com ref is a directory listing ("Data for this page was sourced from XML published by IRS (public 990 form dataset"). And catholiccharitiesny.org is the parent organization, so again not independent. With a couple more sources like the NY Times article, I'd be happy keeping this. As it is, it's pretty marginal. --
208:
580:
Thanks for clarifying this through a better contextual lens. I found it through my university library in a segmented portion and I didn't realize that this kind of thing was not unusual. Best.
355:
I added a number of citations. I found it's legal name which produced a number of solid sources. The Hope Line sounds like a good organization, to be honest. I believe it is notable. --
408:
Just to clarify, my comment about the sources not meeting SIRS does not apply to the NY Times source. That's one that I didn't find myself, and I do thank you for locating it. --
308:
276:
169:
512:
No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources in the article or in searches. Coverage that is significant is either not reliable or not independent and vice-versa.
202:
536:
in 1997 for his work with The Hope Line. I added the congressional record to the article's sources. That and The New York Times piece indicates some substantial RS.
258:
116:
101:
239:
Unsourced for 9 years and apparently non-notable. My own searching finds some passing mentions and directory listings, but nothing that meets
142:
137:
146:
521:
96:
89:
17:
129:
223:
550:
I think you're exaggerating the significance of this. The appropriate section of the
Congressional Record for that day is
325:
293:
190:
442:
110:
106:
66:
487:
455:
428:
610:
551:
40:
184:
438:
589:
564:
545:
533:
524:
502:
478:
446:
415:
403:
385:
364:
349:
332:
300:
268:
250:
180:
71:
606:
474:
133:
36:
399:
360:
230:
466:
Note that additional sources have been added to the article since nomination and should be evaluated
518:
339:
216:
125:
77:
561:
412:
382:
346:
265:
247:
585:
554:
541:
317:
285:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
605:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
470:
196:
395:
356:
62:
513:
371:
240:
577:
558:
409:
379:
343:
262:
244:
370:
Many of those are sources I found when I did my search and dismissed as not meeting
581:
537:
375:
313:
281:
163:
498:
53:
557:, and makes only a passing reference to the subject of this article. --
601:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
490:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
458:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
431:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
532:. Garmendia was formally recognized and honored by the
394:
You make good points. I added a couple more sources. --
159:
155:
151:
342:, this could be merged into that, with a redirect. --
215:
496:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
469:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
437:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
309:list of Latin America-related deletion discussions
277:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
613:). No further edits should be made to this page.
307:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
259:list of New York-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
306:
274:
256:
7:
24:
102:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
590:00:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
350:00:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
72:19:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
565:21:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
546:20:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
525:06:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
503:23:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
479:12:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
447:20:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
416:21:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
404:23:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
386:22:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
365:21:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
333:18:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
301:18:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
269:17:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
251:17:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
630:
603:Please do not modify it.
338:Update: we already have
32:Please do not modify it.
534:United States Congress
90:Articles for deletion
340:Francisco Garmendia
464:Relisting comment:
439:Extraordinary Writ
505:
481:
449:
335:
328:
324:
320:
303:
296:
292:
288:
271:
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
621:
516:
495:
493:
491:
468:
461:
459:
436:
434:
432:
331:
326:
322:
318:
299:
294:
290:
286:
234:
233:
219:
167:
149:
87:
58:
34:
629:
628:
624:
623:
622:
620:
619:
618:
617:
611:deletion review
514:
506:
486:
484:
482:
454:
452:
450:
427:
425:
312:
280:
176:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
70:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
627:
625:
616:
615:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
570:
569:
568:
567:
527:
494:
483:
467:
462:
451:
435:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
389:
388:
353:
352:
336:
304:
272:
237:
236:
173:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
626:
614:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
566:
563:
560:
556:
552:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
528:
526:
523:
520:
517:
511:
508:
507:
504:
501:
500:
492:
489:
480:
476:
472:
465:
460:
457:
448:
444:
440:
433:
430:
417:
414:
411:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
351:
348:
345:
341:
337:
334:
329:
327:contributions
321:
315:
310:
305:
302:
297:
295:contributions
289:
283:
278:
273:
270:
267:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
249:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
126:The Hope Line
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
78:The Hope Line
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
602:
600:
529:
509:
497:
485:
463:
453:
426:
354:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
83:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
471:Qwaiiplayer
203:free images
67:revolutions
555:WP:PRIMARY
396:Wil540 art
357:Wil540 art
607:talk page
530:Weak keep
522:(contrib)
515:Eggishorn
37:talk page
609:or in a
578:RoySmith
559:RoySmith
488:Relisted
456:Relisted
429:Relisted
410:RoySmith
380:RoySmith
344:RoySmith
263:RoySmith
245:RoySmith
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
582:4meter4
538:4meter4
372:WP:SIRS
314:hueman1
282:hueman1
241:WP:SIRS
209:WP refs
197:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
63:spin me
562:(talk)
519:(talk)
510:Delete
499:Seddon
413:(talk)
383:(talk)
347:(talk)
266:(talk)
248:(talk)
181:Google
147:delete
50:delete
376:WP:RS
261:. --
243:. --
224:JSTOR
185:books
164:views
156:watch
152:links
56:78.26
16:<
586:talk
542:talk
475:talk
443:talk
400:talk
361:talk
319:talk
287:talk
217:FENS
191:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
311:. —
279:. —
231:TWL
168:– (
588:)
544:)
477:)
445:)
402:)
363:)
211:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
65:/
52:.
584:(
540:(
473:(
441:(
398:(
359:(
330:)
323:•
316:(
298:)
291:•
284:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
69:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.