337:
There isn't room in 10 columns to discuss the delights of the
Simpsons. So I will limit myself to one observation, based on an ad for the new movie, which opens Friday. The ad shows the residents of Springfield lined up to buy tickets. There are 48 characters behind Homer, and if I couldn't name
411:
Cut some of the summary down, add some more real-world information (which seems fairly probable that it exists, in addition to the existing real-world information), and we'll have a pretty decent sub-article. In the 20 some-odd years that the
Simpsons have been on, even Itchy and Scratchy have
343:
That's astounding. Most novels fail to offer up even one strong, memorable character, never mind 49. There aren't that many multi-layered, deeply nuanced worlds in literature -- Proust's
Combray, Faulkner's Yoknapatawpha County. Springfield, wherever it may be, is surely one of
129:
After a Google search, there are lots of hits. However, there aren't any that make this notable. It has sources, but they're all
Simpsons Episodes or DVD sets. These verify the information, but does not make the subject notable. This is just Simpsons cruft. —
191:"Every damn character on the show has an article"? I find that incredibly offensive because the Simpsons WikiProject has worked incredibly hard in cutting down the cruft and merging pages. We're down to 50, when we could easily have over 100. --
305:- I'm sure that some citations exist showing its impact in the real world. There are so many weak articles on fictional subjects (see the ones I've nominated above) that we don't need to attempt to delete pages on truly popular subjects.
511:
Probably the most famous cartoon-in-a-cartoon known to man. Bad faith nom, who should have an anvil dropped on his head by an
Irishman. Although I'd like to see a Worker & Parasite article, and one for Stingy & Battery...
181:
Given that every damn character on the show has an article, it's hard to argue that this page doesn't belong. If they put as much time into math homework as they do in this crap, we'd be living on the moon eating space-pizza now.
317:
A very notable part of the show, I see no reason at all as to why anyone should even think about deleting it. As for characters, I think the ones that are left are all notable enough and pass any sort of
68:
122:
524:
How can you even consider not having this? Not notable? Start deleting things like this and
Knowledge (XXG) will disappear up its own arse to be run by research scientists.--
95:
90:
99:
257:
per
Scorpion. As the article correctly notes, this is the "show within a show" that is a part of each episode of The Simpsons. Besides being a bizarre parody of
82:
239:
Note: I am in the process of adding refs from IGN and Vanity Fair. That counts as two refs from independant sources and thus every guideline is satisfied. --
274:
273:
A show-within-a-show that's more notable than most actual sitcoms. Real-world-info is easily available, and there's plenty of third-party analysis.
431:
147:
There doesn't appear to be significant coverage from independent sources, but I can't help but think there might be more sources like the
412:
impacted and effected the real world enough to be included on
Knowledge (XXG) (which is out of the norm for most fictional topics). --
17:
468:
86:
360:
286:
602:
583:
567:
555:
543:
528:
516:
503:
491:
479:
456:
It has many sources and I think that the subject is as notable as any tertiary and maybe secondary character on the show. –
448:
434:
416:
403:
383:
371:
322:
309:
297:
265:
243:
228:
210:
195:
186:
171:
155:
136:
52:
164:
78:
58:
617:
201:
36:
428:
616:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
474:
443:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
395:
per Fee Fi Fo Fum. However, I would recommend cutting down the in-universe "history" of the characters per
464:
425:
596:
400:
306:
355:
281:
595:. Not exactly a shining article, but seems to have sufficient out-of-universe context by now.
240:
225:
192:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
592:
221:
458:
396:
329:
Agreed. If any show deserves that many character sub-articles, it's The
Simpsons. To quote
148:
540:
535:
525:
500:
413:
380:
330:
262:
552:
351:
319:
277:
258:
513:
261:, it's always been a clever satire of gratuitous violence in film and television.
183:
49:
116:
577:
564:
168:
167:
I'm less sure about, and it may be a good idea to nominate that at some point.
152:
488:
204:. But that is irrelevant. As a side note, most of those should be deleted. —
365:
291:
338:
every single one, I could name most and knew the personalities of the rest.
224:
guidelines and it has a section of real world info (see: Background). --
205:
131:
610:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
163:
And it looks like said references have been found and added.
551:. A major element of an extremely notable television series.
487:
It needs a copy edit, but clearly has enough OOU info.
112:
108:
104:
563:. Obviously deserving of a Knowledge (XXG) article. --
276:. I'm very confident I could make this a FA someday.
69:
Articles for deletion/The Itchy & Scratchy Show
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
620:). No further edits should be made to this page.
499:Are you serious? It's Itchy & Scratchy! -
8:
66:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
165:List of Itchy and Scratchy cartoons
65:
24:
220:: The article clearly passes the
151:that are just harder to find.
603:19:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
584:18:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
568:18:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
556:16:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
544:15:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
529:10:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
517:08:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
504:07:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
492:07:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
480:06:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
449:06:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
435:06:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
417:05:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
404:05:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
384:03:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
372:03:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
323:03:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
310:03:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
298:02:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
266:02:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
244:02:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
229:02:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
211:02:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
196:02:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
187:02:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
172:04:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
156:01:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
137:01:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
53:22:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
79:The Itchy & Scratchy Show
59:The Itchy & Scratchy Show
637:
202:other things have articles
575:as per all of the above.
539:. I am serious here. --
350:. July 23, 2007. p. 20.)
613:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
64:AfDs for this article:
149:interview with MSNBC
442:Clearly notable. •
478:
348:Chicago Sun-Times
628:
615:
599:
598:Ten Pound Hammer
591:, seems to pass
580:
462:
446:
368:
363:
358:
294:
289:
284:
120:
102:
34:
636:
635:
631:
630:
629:
627:
626:
625:
624:
618:deletion review
611:
597:
578:
444:
379:- Per Rhino131
366:
361:
356:
292:
287:
282:
93:
77:
74:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
634:
632:
623:
622:
606:
605:
586:
570:
558:
546:
531:
519:
506:
494:
482:
451:
445:Lawrence Cohen
437:
424:per Rhino131.
419:
406:
401:Metropolitan90
389:
388:
387:
386:
374:
340:
331:Neil Steinberg
326:
325:
312:
307:Fee Fi Foe Fum
300:
268:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
232:
231:
215:
214:
213:
198:
176:
175:
174:
127:
126:
73:
72:
71:
63:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
633:
621:
619:
614:
608:
607:
604:
600:
594:
590:
587:
585:
582:
581:
574:
571:
569:
566:
562:
559:
557:
554:
550:
547:
545:
542:
538:
537:
532:
530:
527:
523:
520:
518:
515:
510:
507:
505:
502:
498:
495:
493:
490:
486:
483:
481:
477:
476:
471:
470:
466:
461:
460:
455:
452:
450:
447:
441:
438:
436:
433:
430:
427:
423:
420:
418:
415:
410:
407:
405:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
385:
382:
378:
375:
373:
370:
369:
364:
359:
353:
349:
345:
341:
339:
335:
334:
332:
328:
327:
324:
321:
316:
313:
311:
308:
304:
301:
299:
296:
295:
290:
285:
279:
275:
272:
269:
267:
264:
260:
259:Tom and Jerry
256:
253:
252:
245:
242:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
216:
212:
209:
208:
203:
199:
197:
194:
190:
189:
188:
185:
180:
177:
173:
170:
166:
162:
159:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
134:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
612:
609:
588:
576:
572:
560:
548:
533:
521:
508:
496:
484:
473:
463:
457:
453:
439:
421:
408:
392:
376:
354:
347:
342:
336:
314:
302:
280:
270:
254:
217:
206:
178:
160:
143:
142:
132:
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
534:Delete per
497:Strong Keep
459:thedemonhog
315:Strong Keep
271:Strong keep
218:Strong Keep
144:Weak delete
318:guidlines.
541:Ekjon Lok
536:Egghead06
526:Egghead06
501:Rocket000
414:Ned Scott
381:Reginmund
263:Mandsford
553:23skidoo
352:Zagalejo
320:Rhino131
278:Zagalejo
241:Scorpion
226:Scorpion
200:We know
193:Scorpion
123:View log
593:WP:FICT
514:Lugnuts
429:megalon
222:WP:FICT
184:MarkBul
179:Comment
96:protect
91:history
50:JForget
579:Pursey
565:Michig
397:WP:WAF
169:17Drew
153:17Drew
100:delete
469:edits
440:Keep.
344:them.
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
589:Keep
573:Keep
561:Keep
549:Keep
522:Keep
509:Keep
489:Gran
485:Keep
465:talk
454:Keep
432:2000
426:Maxa
422:Keep
409:Keep
399:. --
393:Keep
377:Keep
303:Keep
255:Keep
161:Keep
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
46:Keep
601:•
475:box
121:– (
472:•
467:•
333::
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
48:--
367:^
362:^
357:^
346:(
293:^
288:^
283:^
207:i
133:i
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.