312:
edit an article about oneself or about an organization that one heads. I think the policies should say only that one should be especially careful in such cases to avoid the problems that can result. As long as the article sticks to what a disinterested party could write, I'd say those problems are
88:
83:
92:
75:
149:
Zero google scholar hits but appears to be a genuine journal associated with a university. Plain ghits is 4, three of which are from
Knowledge (XXG)! Leaving a grand total of 1 hit - but that hit is apparently for an academic conference at Thai University (On Koh Samui
128:
This was speedy deleted. The creating editor clearly has a conflict of interest, but this is a peer reviewed journal and we have lots of articles on such journals. I think this should be decided by consensus here. At this stsge I have no other opinion on it.
169:, looks like this journal hasn't published issue 1 yet. Safe to say that currently it isn't notable. nce people start citing papers from it in other journals then it should be welcomed back to Knowledge (XXG).
206:. It has only published a single issue, a few months ago. I don't think that is enough (without some sort of big media splash) to establish an academic journal as notable. Give it time to build some weight. —
322:
300:
283:
250:
233:
215:
197:
178:
138:
57:
241:
No reason to get rid of it; in the meantime it's good for it have an article so it can easily be updated if a breakthrough paper is published there, or something of the opposite happens.
121:
79:
185:
71:
63:
157:
but without prejudice for recreation once the journal has managed to achieve some presence. Is there a specific policy on notability for academic journals?
291:
I for sure search for articles in GoogleScholar rather than journals but that is just me, on the other the editor might have not finished his article.
224:
17:
337:
36:
53:
336:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
211:
193:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
318:
308:
Worries about conflicts of interest on
Knowledge (XXG) are overblown. Some people seem to think one should
174:
162:
246:
49:
274:
has some sense, also I’ve made some search with yahoo no1 according to alexia.com and found some hits.
207:
189:
314:
292:
259:
170:
158:
279:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
296:
271:
242:
134:
267:
270:
of the conference at the Thai
University they seems to be some how related. Besides
275:
263:
109:
229:
130:
72:
The
International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics
64:
The
International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics
165:) 05:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC) - Changing my erm, not-a-vote-thing to
330:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
186:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Academic Journals
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
340:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
227:, and the article doesnt state an ISSN.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
357:
323:20:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
301:12:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
284:07:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
251:06:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
234:01:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
216:00:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
198:00:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
179:05:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
139:05:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
58:08:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
333:Please do not modify it.
266:of this journal and the
32:Please do not modify it.
48:to delete the article.
313:successfully avoided.
223:. I can't find it in
262:I've examine the
200:
348:
335:
232:
183:
119:
113:
95:
50:Martijn Hoekstra
44:The result was
34:
356:
355:
351:
350:
349:
347:
346:
345:
344:
338:deletion review
331:
264:editorial board
230:John Vandenberg
228:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
354:
352:
343:
342:
326:
325:
303:
286:
253:
236:
218:
208:David Eppstein
201:
190:David Eppstein
181:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
353:
341:
339:
334:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
315:Michael Hardy
311:
307:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:Nick Connolly
257:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
235:
231:
226:
222:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
182:
180:
176:
172:
171:Nick Connolly
168:
164:
160:
159:Nick Connolly
156:
153:
148:
147:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
332:
329:
309:
305:
288:
255:
238:
225:worldcat.org
220:
203:
166:
154:
151:
145:
144:
127:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
272:OptimistBen
243:OptimistBen
184:Listed at
268:Committee
122:View log
306:Comment
276:BlueQ99
152:Perhaps
150:hmmmm).
146:Neutral
89:protect
84:history
293:DKNY89
221:Delete
204:Delete
167:Delete
155:delete
117:delete
93:delete
310:NEVER
131:Bduke
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
319:talk
297:talk
289:Keep
280:talk
256:Keep
247:talk
239:Keep
212:talk
194:talk
175:talk
163:talk
135:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
258:em
188:. —
321:)
299:)
282:)
249:)
214:)
196:)
177:)
137:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
317:(
295:(
278:(
245:(
210:(
192:(
173:(
161:(
133:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.