595:. For me, it's the lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. When I searched for your newspaper, I could not find other media discussing it in any detail - there were a couple of passing mentions and the Boston Globe article I have added. So, for instance, the article mentions the paper's role in publicising the university's financial ties to South Africa. If a reference was cited where an independent, published source had described the paper's activism and the effect on the university, that would be coverage which could count towards notability. Does that help?
1052:) brings up some very valuable points. This article has been sufficiently edited to fully comply with all five of the criteria of what makes an article notable if it is a student newspaper, and only one point is necessary. The Justice has a significant history and it appears from the edits that it is perfectly notable for an encyclopedia like Knowledge. Repeating (
956:-specific content of those sources into prose, then cite the sources as references. It might seem like adding more and more citations would be helpful, but Knowledge editors have seen a lot of people doing this to promote or otherwise overstate the importance of an article subject, so it can come across as promotional rather than encyclopedic.
558:
1019:- The website for Brandeis's official history frequently relies on articles published by the subject dating back to the school's founding, indicating "historic purpose". The subject's "significance" is to the school community through the content it publishes and distributes weekly; this should be sufficient for a campus publication.
319:
I don't know the nom, but I know as a prolific AfC reviewer I've become pretty good at assessing pages. Thanks for the link to arguements to avoid - which apply exactly to the waive of the "not notable" wand without any basis that this nomination is comprised of. The paper itself is a reliable source
840:
If "significant history" was intended to mean "being published for a long time", they could have simply said that, or "long history", or (as I said before) "has been published for x number of years." And clearly, significance of history would be established by coverage of that history in independent
683:
Student media, such as over-the-air college radio stations and student newspapers, are not presumed non-notable just because they primarily serve a university or college student population, but are judged by the same inclusion standards as any other media outlet. A student newspaper or radio station
583:
that this is a student-run newspaper — of which many exist in
Massachusetts and around the country — it is not notable. The University sites the newspaper, large media corporations have sited the paper (an example of such has been linked several times), and readership is worldwide. What am I missing
987:
While potentially evidence supporting "frequently cited by other reliable sources", I moved the list to the talk page for reference because it's a completely unsuitable list for an article. It might be possible to incorporate some of it into the article, like the controversy about their coverage of
739:
1) In an AfD discussion you only !vote once, meaning the bolded keep or delete or whatever should only be bolded in one of your comments, to help the closing admin evaluate the discussion. 2) It looks like you're signing your comments with copy/paste or manually, but a much easier and automatic way
825:
That is twisting the simple english meaning. How in the world do you decIde what is
Signifocant history vs insignificant history and to whom? I have no relationship to the school amd could care less about it, but the history of my own school is significant to me and those connected to the school.
266:
indeed I reverted your redirect which points at a few words on the university page, which is too long a page to permit any real discussion of an editorially independant publication. No evidence presented here or elsewhere that a student newspaper published since 1949 is not notable. We even have
761:
1. have produced award winning work 2. have served some sort of historic purpose or have a significant history 3. are considered by reliable sources to be authoritative in their subject area 4. are frequently cited by other reliable sources 5. are significant publications in ethnic and other
1031:- The subject has been the student newspaper since 1949, essentially since Brandeis's founding, and its printing and circulation around campus is presumably funded by the school. That seems to demonstrate continued significance to Brandeis University- clearly a "non-trivial niche market."
874:
as the subject has received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, some listed in the article, some listed in this discussion, and some available in newspaper archives. I have added a talk page section and article section template to get more attention to the close
1023:- I'm assuming "Subject area" refers here to Brandeis students and the school's administration. Citations on this page indicate that reputable news outlets do treat the subject as an "authoritative" source on news developments regarding Brandeis affairs.
503:
established in 1949, almost 60 years before the
Brandeis Hoot. If there are improvements that can be made to the article itself, I would be more than happy to address those. jengeller9, 13:24, 4 November 2018; edited by jengeller9 16:23, 6 November 2018
1027:- "Frequently" is obviously relative, but for the subset of issues about which Brandeis has received attention from reliable media outlets (ie. the retraction of Ayaan Hirsi Ali's honorary degree in 2014), the subject's articles are frequently cited.
365:, which is explicitly in the article. The institution of journalism builds upon itself, and The Justice is a notable part of University culture. Hence, although Brandeis is a small school that is relatively new with a limited history, broadening
639:
Incidental mentions aren't "extensive coverage" and those last two links are definitely incidental mentions, though they might count as being cited by a reliable sources. The first NYT article would seem to count towards extensive coverage.
767:
following the green cited criteria " 2. have served some sort of historic purpose or have a significant history" is met. Paper has been continously published since 1949 right? That seems to be a significant history of almost 70 years.
731:
said based upon their criteria, the
Justice is therefore allowed to serve primarily the Brandeis community and still remain notable. However, other notable news sources have referenced The Justice. jengeller9, 19:47, 4 November
623:
Here are three distinct articles the
Justice has been mentioned in. Two are by the New York Times and the third is by American Thinker. One New York Times and the American Thinker article are cited in the Knowledge article. 1)
209:
267:
categories for student newspapers so they are not inherently non notable. As a very experiemced AfC reviewer I accepted this page from Draft. I have a very good track record of decerning what is and is not a notable topic.
782:
Simply existing for a long period of time does not establish "significant history." It establishes history, not that the history is significant, or the criteria would simply be "has been published for x number of years."
384:
to expand. A limited amount of resources does not make the paper notable. If the NYT did not deem the paper worthy of citation or reliable they never would have sited it. jengeller9, 19:58, 4 November 2018
609:
Many other student papers just in Mass have been found notable. I don't understand the hate against this paper. Most of its existence is preinternet which makes finding sources harder.
203:
826:
Therefore the intent behind "significant" must be a reference to time, or in other words not a blog started last month or a two issue paper that quickly folded and everyone forgot.
510:
292:
is either to the paper itself or to
Brandeis publications. That being said, of course student newspapers aren't inherently non notable, but neither are they inherently notable,
636:. These are not Brandeis and cite the Justice in articles about Brandeis. I will insert the last article by the NYT into the Knowledge page. jengeller9, 19:23, 4 November 2018
531:
On that note, why do other student publications have pages and this one cannot? What makes this one less notable than any other student newspapers? jengeller9, 4 November 2018
440:
162:
346:
Brandeis-connected source can count. As to whether every editorially controlled print publication is inherently notable, would you mind linking the guideline saying so?
421:
841:
reliable sources, just as are other aspects of notability are - personal significance to those attending or related to the school is irrelevant without that. --
754:
Thank you; this is my first wikipedia article and so my first time dealing with voting-based pages. I appreciate your help!!! jengeller9, 20:18, 5 November 2018
629:
362:
740:
is just to type four tildes in a row at the end of your comment, which will insert your username, link to talk page, and the date without any further effort.
320:
and I believe darn near every editorially controlled print publication is inheriently notable. We are not talking about a fence post here but a newspaper.
135:
130:
109:
952:
It's good to see sources, but it would definitely be helpful to readers (and be much more consistent with
Knowledge article format and style) to turn the
139:
94:
875:
paraphrasing of sources, since that is a potential copyvio concern, but that is likely an editing issue that does not rise to a reason for deletion.
169:
122:
764:
Thus far, I'm not sure any of those are met - a couple of references to the paper doesn't establish "frequently cited by other reliable sources."
288:
Ummm ... then you found significant coverage in independent reliable sources of this campus paper? Spiffy. Where are those sources? Because
759:
Yes, simply being a student paper doesn't make it inherently non-notable, but it would be presumed to be notable if it meets at least one of
224:
191:
1032:
1015:- Ditkowski's award for the article on doctoral program funding cuts, noted on the page under "Digital era", is one such instance.
579:
What I am failing to understand is that despite proving that the
Justice is an entity that is independent of another organization
562:
400:
89:
82:
17:
1053:
1049:
1036:
185:
811:
No, simply being published for a long time does not establish notability. The history itself needs to be of significance. --
1011:
Ravenswing's objections seem to have been addressed by subsequent edits. Regarding each of the criteria for notability-
633:
300:, with a quarter million edits over a decade's time, is not what I'd call inexperienced at gauging notability herself.)
181:
126:
1065:
1040:
997:
982:
965:
943:
920:
902:
884:
850:
835:
820:
806:
792:
777:
749:
719:
695:
649:
618:
604:
574:
543:
522:
451:
432:
406:
356:
329:
310:
276:
257:
64:
103:
99:
231:
1082:
534:
It's entirely possible that a bunch of those aren't notable either, but that is irrelevant to this discussion. --
40:
1061:
708:
625:
907:
Given that jenguller9 describes the work of the paper as "our work", they might definitely want to consider
118:
70:
489:. The Brandeis Hoot, the other newspaper of Brandeis University, has its own page and on this campus, but
678:
513:
which has quite few entries just for a single state. Why are all these papers notable but not this paper.
361:
The
Justice has been cited by other news organizations such as the New York Times, an example of which is
1057:
197:
1078:
993:
970:
916:
846:
816:
788:
691:
645:
539:
36:
565:), and have added the latter to the article, but still do not think this is enough to meet notability.
978:
939:
396:
388:
347:
301:
293:
241:
684:
which is deemed non-notable should always be redirected to the college or university that it serves.
831:
802:
773:
614:
518:
325:
272:
245:
217:
961:
908:
880:
745:
715:
671:: Seems to have been cited relatively often by reliable sources, plus some mentions as a subject.
52:. Even after discounting the COI and likely canvassed accounts, there's no consensus to delete.
898:
600:
570:
444:
425:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1077:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
465:
As a student newspaper for
Brandeis University, the first one created at the school at that,
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
989:
912:
842:
812:
784:
728:
687:
674:
641:
535:
253:
974:
935:
592:
392:
973:
was your removal of the links a formatting concern? What was the rationale behind that?
342:
to bolster its own notability: the very definition requires an "independent" source, so
827:
798:
769:
610:
514:
321:
268:
55:
957:
876:
741:
711:
479:
work is read throughout the University and the world and reaches a broad audience on
630:
Brandeis Cancels Plan to Give Honorary Degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Critic of Islam,
894:
596:
566:
339:
156:
934:
Several other sources referencing The Justice were just added into the article.
297:
249:
1021:
3. are considered by reliable sources to be authoritative in their subject area
1029:
5. are significant publications in ethnic and other non-trivial niche markets.
893:
Thanks. Wonder if a CoI tag and discussion on user page would also be useful?
797:
Significant history = being published for a long time. That is plain English.
584:
that makes this organization not notable? jengeller9, 15:36 4 November 2018
1017:
2.have served some sort of historic purpose or have a significant history
710:, though that incident does not appear to be described in this article.
1073:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1056:) would be a waste of time, but I second all of their points.
496:
is a separate entity. The two newspapers are not affiliated.
486:
472:
a notable aspect of the University that publishes weekly.
463:
Hello, I am the individual who created this article entry.
152:
148:
144:
703:
There was certainly coverage of an incident involving
511:
Category:Student_newspapers_published_in_Massachusetts
296:. Obvious failure of the GNG is obvious. (By the bye,
216:
441:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
1025:4. are frequently cited by other reliable sources
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1085:). No further edits should be made to this page.
439:Note: This discussion has been included in the
420:Note: This discussion has been included in the
422:list of News media-related deletion discussions
230:
8:
673:So, the relevant notability criteria are at
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
438:
419:
386:
1054:User talk:The Misunderestimated Decider
1050:User talk:The Misunderestimated Decider
334:Errr ... no. You must know that under
294:whether first published in 1949 or 1649
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
988:the sexual assault awareness event. --
760:
682:
563:Brandeis newspaper delays publication
7:
290:every single citation in the article
1013:1. have produced award winning work
338:circumstances can any entity be a
24:
557:. I found two other references (
246:Brandeis University#Publications
95:Introduction to deletion process
634:The Brandeis University Debacle
626:Brandeis Roiled by Holocaust Ad
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
686:Just want to be clear here. --
244:. I did propose a redirect to
1:
1048:After reading this article, (
1033:The Misunderestimated Decider
65:18:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
1066:22:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
1041:21:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
998:21:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
983:21:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
966:21:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
944:20:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
921:14:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
903:09:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
885:01:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
851:22:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
836:21:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
821:22:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
807:22:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
793:15:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
778:15:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
750:01:10, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
720:23:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
696:23:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
650:14:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
619:21:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
605:21:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
575:18:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
544:22:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
523:20:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
452:16:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
433:16:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
407:16:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
357:00:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
330:21:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
311:20:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
277:15:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
258:15:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1102:
762:non-trivial niche markets.
1075:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
677:, right? Specifically,
405:; edited by jengeller9
248:but this was reverted.
119:The Justice (newspaper)
71:The Justice (newspaper)
369:readership is a goal
83:Articles for deletion
707:in 1993, see e.g.
555:Delete or redirect
454:
435:
404:
391:comment added by
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
1093:
729:User:tronvillain
449:
430:
353:
307:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1083:deletion review
679:WP:STUDENTMEDIA
470:the paper makes
445:
426:
349:
340:reliable source
303:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1099:
1097:
1088:
1087:
1069:
1068:
1058:Wikihelper3921
1043:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
968:
947:
946:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
888:
887:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
757:
756:
755:
734:
733:
722:
698:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
607:
586:
585:
577:
559:Marcuse letter
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
526:
525:
506:
505:
456:
455:
436:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
314:
313:
280:
279:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1098:
1086:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1006:
999:
995:
991:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
972:
969:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
950:
949:
948:
945:
941:
937:
933:
930:
929:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
905:
904:
900:
896:
892:
891:
890:
889:
886:
882:
878:
873:
870:
869:
852:
848:
844:
839:
838:
837:
833:
829:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
794:
790:
786:
781:
780:
779:
775:
771:
766:
765:
763:
758:
753:
752:
751:
747:
743:
738:
737:
736:
735:
730:
726:
723:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
702:
699:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:, which says
680:
676:
672:
670:
666:
665:
661:
660:
651:
647:
643:
638:
637:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
620:
616:
612:
608:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
588:
587:
582:
578:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
553:
552:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
530:
529:
528:
527:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:
502:
499:
495:
492:
488:
485:
482:
478:
475:
471:
468:
464:
461:
458:
457:
453:
450:
448:
442:
437:
434:
431:
429:
423:
418:
408:
402:
398:
394:
390:
383:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
358:
355:
354:
352:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
309:
308:
306:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
274:
270:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:WP:NOTABILITY
240:Doesn't meet
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1074:
1072:
1045:
1008:
953:
931:
871:
724:
704:
700:
668:
667:
663:
662:
580:
554:
500:
497:
493:
490:
483:
480:
476:
473:
469:
466:
462:
459:
447:CAPTAIN RAJU
446:
428:CAPTAIN RAJU
427:
387:— Preceding
381:
377:
374:
370:
366:
350:
348:
343:
335:
304:
302:
289:
285:
263:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
990:tronvillain
913:tronvillain
909:WP:DISCLOSE
843:tronvillain
813:tronvillain
785:tronvillain
705:The Justice
688:tronvillain
642:tronvillain
536:tronvillain
501:The Justice
494:the Justice
351:Ravenswing
305:Ravenswing
298:User:Boleyn
204:free images
975:Jengeller9
936:Jengeller9
694:); edited
593:jengeller9
393:Jengeller9
58:Sandstein
1079:talk page
828:Legacypac
799:Legacypac
770:Legacypac
675:WP:NMEDIA
611:Legacypac
515:Legacypac
378:the paper
322:Legacypac
269:Legacypac
37:talk page
1081:or in a
958:Bakazaka
877:Bakazaka
742:Bakazaka
712:Bakazaka
401:contribs
389:unsigned
380:continue
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
954:Justice
932:Comment
895:Tacyarg
725:Comment
701:Comment
664:Comment
597:Tacyarg
567:Tacyarg
498:We were
487:website
371:of ours
286:Delete:
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
491:we are
467:we are
373:, and
363:linked
250:Boleyn
182:Google
140:delete
628:, 2)
504:(UTC)
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
1062:talk
1046:Keep
1037:talk
1009:Keep
994:talk
979:talk
971:talk
962:talk
940:talk
917:talk
911:. --
899:talk
881:talk
872:Keep
847:talk
832:talk
817:talk
803:talk
789:talk
774:talk
746:talk
732:2018
716:talk
692:talk
669:Keep
646:talk
615:talk
601:talk
571:talk
561:and
540:talk
519:talk
509:see
460:Keep
397:talk
326:talk
273:talk
264:Keep
254:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
727:As
632:3)
591:Hi
581:AND
484:the
481:our
477:The
474:Our
367:our
232:TWL
161:– (
1064:)
1039:)
996:)
981:)
964:)
942:)
919:)
901:)
883:)
849:)
834:)
819:)
805:)
791:)
783:--
776:)
748:)
718:)
648:)
640:--
617:)
603:)
573:)
542:)
521:)
443:.
424:.
403:)
399:•
375:we
344:no
336:no
328:)
275:)
256:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
1060:(
1035:(
992:(
977:(
960:(
938:(
915:(
897:(
879:(
845:(
830:(
815:(
801:(
787:(
772:(
744:(
714:(
690:(
644:(
613:(
599:(
569:(
538:(
517:(
395:(
382:s
324:(
271:(
252:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.