754:, "not sure of notability" isn't really a rationale for deletion. It appears to me that most of the sources are passing mentions: The Washington Examiner article is mostly about Joe Rogan the person, and not the podcast; and the New York Times article mentioned appears to have cumulative mentions of no more than a few sentences in the whole thing. I suppose someone could perform 10 seconds of research and return with the results, but they could equally add citations or renominate in the case of a procedural close. —
704:- again, !votes can't just declare someone is notable they should say why. Likewise, if you're going to say a google search shows extensive coverage (which is certainly possible) it has more worth as a point if you can link to a couple of actually functional sources. These are supposed to be !votes, not votes
843:
That's a good source, and I was hoping it could add to one of the very few stated above to finally let this be resolved. Alas the NY one doesn't come close to satisfying Sig Cov, and I can't judge
Washington Examiner properly (I can't tell whether it counts as an Op Ed piece) because it has a habit
364:
Article needs help, but it's seemingly a permanent top 10 podcast in most rankings of that medium. I'm surprised it doesn't have more to it, honestly; usually we have a whole mess of cruft to deal with, but we have a basic history of the production, not of guests, so a balance is needed there.
412:
Rogan isn't subject to interviews as often since he began the podcast, so it's a little more difficult unless we use snippets from the podcasts themselves. Redban has talked about the history of the podcast on other interviews, which has helped tremendously. I'll take a look at his
820:
National Review article, which seems to be a mostly significant mention of the podcast (and its style) and not of the guests appearing or the man. I'll be going through the remaining 9 pages of Google results later to determine if there are any better sources. Comments welcome.
980:
The article and sourcing is better since its 2014 deletion nomination, it's one of the more notable podcasts as stated above and just because it's a podcast doesn't mean it can't have its own article (if any sports podcasts deserves an article its this one).
232:
284:
474:
this show gets more listens than many shows on CNN and other networks which have wiki articles. It is heavily cited in writing on the rise of alternative media. I'm sure more citations can be found.
264:
89:
324:
226:
185:
304:
398:
Are there sources that show notability of the podcast itself? The sources in the article are either primary sources or sources that only mention the podcast in passing.
713:
would certainly imply notability. His podcast is frequently reported on both in MMA press and mainstream press as a significant platform. And while I'm sympathetic to
898:
869:
117:
158:
153:
192:
162:
132:
507:- I was just going to give this a NAC close as Keep, but as it stands all the Keep statements are some combination of "there are sources out there", "
145:
669:- I don't know much about the podcast or man but even I have heard of it. This is not a ILIKEIT !vote. Google search shows extensive coverage.
930:, plus the Washington Examiner, Rolling Stone and National Review articles, notability has finally been reasonably established. Now to ping
440:. Of course it's become more notable since then, 10 seconds of research or just reading the article as it stands would have revealed that. —
491:
247:
883:
613:
533:
It's because sources are so plentiful. You don't need someone to post them because they're everywhere. But here's one if you need it.
214:
112:
105:
17:
902:
817:
905:
National Review, there is finally sufficient sourcing (that doesn't crash my computer) actually stated to give a clear keep under
947:
830:
763:
534:
126:
122:
537:
208:
149:
776:
563:
512:
1013:
996:
951:
918:
889:
853:
834:
806:
767:
734:
710:
696:
679:
661:
640:
621:
596:
552:
524:
499:
478:
466:
449:
426:
407:
389:
356:
336:
316:
296:
276:
74:
1030:
747:
579:
40:
204:
935:
718:
575:
254:
721:
not being sufficient on their own, there's also no particularly strong rationale presented for deletion beyond
462:
422:
141:
80:
495:
751:
609:
457:. It's notable and popular enough. With some additional good sources I think this can be a strong article.
877:
617:
872:
article discusses the podcast in detail, as well as Rogan himself. I'm not sure why this is still open.
515:. It clearly is popular, but actually citing a couple of the best sources seems the logical thing to do.
1026:
988:
967:
914:
849:
636:
520:
36:
927:
606:. The Joe Rogan podcast is the most popular podcast in the world. This page needs help, not deletion.
267:
in 2014, with the result of redirect to Joe Rogan. Not sure if it has become more notable since then.
220:
1009:
743:
714:
508:
943:
826:
759:
730:
692:
657:
458:
418:
380:
240:
787:
Additional sources may be provided, and the
Washington Examiner article may be further evaluated.
574:
As per
Nosebagbear's rationale. Would be nice if some of the Keep !votes actually went beyond
873:
801:
445:
403:
352:
332:
312:
292:
272:
101:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1025:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
62:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
982:
963:
910:
845:
742:
with no prejudice against speedy renomination. While the keep !votes more or less fall into
632:
516:
57:
906:
722:
1005:
670:
543:
939:
822:
755:
726:
688:
653:
368:
53:
586:
475:
931:
792:
487:
441:
399:
348:
328:
308:
288:
268:
66:
866:
179:
725:
and a pretty clear consensus that nobody monitoring AFD wants this page deleted.
687:
Rogan may be a bit of an annoying jerk, but he's a notable annoying jerk.
1021:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
542:
states his podcast is the second most popular one after Oprah.
779:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
566:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
285:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
60:
for reviewing and finding sources with significant coverage.
934:
for a possible early close. I also propose we trout all the
926:. I think with the incidental coverage re. Conor McGregor,
844:
of crashing my computer, which makes it unhelpful for me.
417:
feature article and see if anything worthy is in there.
175:
171:
167:
239:
790:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
585:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
263:Not sure if this podcast is notable or not. It was
253:
961:Hopefully each trout can be used more than once...
1004:Notable. One of the most popular podcasts today.
325:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1033:). No further edits should be made to this page.
323:Note: This discussion has been included in the
303:Note: This discussion has been included in the
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
94:Articles for deletion/The Joe Rogan Experience
909:, which seems most appropriate for podcasts.
305:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
133:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
868:is a sufficient claim of notability. This
607:
322:
302:
282:
90:Articles for deletion/Joe Rogan Experience
486:. My thoughts articulated perfectly by
347:I was the closer for the previous AfD.
52:. Withdrawing as nominator. Thanks to
490:above at 15:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC).--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
816:After a bit of trawling, I've found
87:
24:
928:this Indianapolis Monthly article
631:And alas, another ILIKEIT !vote
118:Introduction to deletion process
1:
1014:16:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
997:20:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
952:03:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
919:22:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
890:21:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
865:being the #3 rated podcast
854:14:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
835:13:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
807:12:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
768:04:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
735:13:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
622:18:48, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
108:(AfD)? Read these primers!
75:19:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
1050:
697:18:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
680:05:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
662:07:59, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
641:14:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
597:13:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
553:05:38, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
525:10:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
500:00:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
479:01:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
467:10:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
450:15:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
427:10:00, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
408:00:20, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
390:23:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
357:19:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
337:19:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
317:19:44, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
297:19:44, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
277:19:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
1023:Please do not modify it.
505:Comment - Justifications
142:The Joe Rogan Experience
81:The Joe Rogan Experience
32:Please do not modify it.
265:nominated for deletion
86:AfDs for this article:
106:Articles for deletion
652:. Fix, not delete.
513:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
63:(non-admin closure)
991:-constructive zone
785:Relisting comment:
748:WP:Clearly notable
711:9500 news mentions
580:WP:Clearly notable
572:Relisting comment:
539:The New York Times
995:
962:
809:
624:
612:comment added by
599:
387:
339:
319:
299:
123:Guide to deletion
113:How to contribute
65:
1041:
987:
960:
936:WP:MUSTBESOURCES
901:article and the
886:
880:
804:
800:
798:
795:
789:
782:
780:
740:Procedural close
719:WP:MUSTBESOURCES
593:
590:
584:
576:WP:MUSTBESOURCES
569:
567:
388:
383:
377:
376:
371:
258:
257:
243:
195:
183:
165:
103:
61:
34:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1031:deletion review
884:
878:
810:
802:
796:
793:
791:
775:
773:
600:
591:
588:
562:
560:
381:
374:
369:
366:
345:Procedural note
200:
191:
156:
140:
137:
100:
97:
84:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1047:
1045:
1036:
1035:
1017:
1016:
999:
992:
985:
974:
973:
972:
971:
955:
954:
921:
892:
859:
858:
857:
856:
838:
837:
788:
783:
772:
771:
770:
737:
705:
702:Details, again
699:
682:
664:
646:
645:
644:
643:
626:
625:
583:
570:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
528:
527:
502:
481:
469:
459:LowSelfEstidle
452:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
419:LowSelfEstidle
393:
392:
359:
341:
340:
320:
300:
261:
260:
197:
136:
135:
130:
120:
115:
98:
96:
85:
83:
78:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1046:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1000:
998:
994:
993:
990:
986:
983:
979:
976:
975:
969:
965:
959:
958:
957:
956:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
922:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:Rolling Stone
896:
893:
891:
887:
881:
875:
871:
870:Rolling Stone
867:
864:
861:
860:
855:
851:
847:
842:
841:
840:
839:
836:
832:
828:
824:
819:
815:
812:
811:
808:
805:
799:
786:
781:
778:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:WP:GOOGLEHITS
749:
745:
741:
738:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
709:
706:
703:
700:
698:
694:
690:
686:
683:
681:
677:
676:
675:
668:
665:
663:
659:
655:
651:
648:
647:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
605:
602:
601:
598:
595:
594:
581:
577:
573:
568:
565:
554:
550:
549:
548:
541:
540:
535:
532:
531:
530:
529:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
492:157.52.16.221
489:
485:
482:
480:
477:
473:
470:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
435:
428:
424:
420:
416:
415:Rolling Stone
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
394:
391:
386:
384:
373:
372:
363:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
256:
252:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
206:
203:
202:Find sources:
198:
194:
190:
187:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
160:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
134:
131:
128:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
107:
102:
95:
92:
91:
82:
79:
77:
76:
72:
68:
64:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1022:
1020:
1001:
989:
977:
923:
894:
874:power~enwiki
862:
813:
784:
774:
739:
707:
701:
684:
673:
671:
666:
649:
614:107.7.91.190
608:— Preceding
603:
587:
571:
561:
546:
544:
538:
504:
483:
471:
454:
437:
414:
378:
367:
361:
344:
262:
250:
244:
236:
229:
223:
217:
211:
201:
188:
99:
93:
88:
49:
47:
31:
28:
964:Nosebagbear
938:!voters. —
911:Nosebagbear
846:Nosebagbear
633:Nosebagbear
517:Nosebagbear
227:free images
58:Nosebagbear
1006:Finnishela
744:WP:ILIKEIT
715:WP:ILIKEIT
509:WP:ILIKEIT
1027:talk page
940:Alpha3031
897:with the
823:Alpha3031
756:Alpha3031
727:Simonm223
689:Simonm223
654:Ottoshade
54:Alpha3031
37:talk page
1029:or in a
777:Relisted
674:Мандичка
610:unsigned
564:Relisted
547:Мандичка
476:Danski14
186:View log
127:glossary
39:or in a
932:Natg 19
708:Comment
488:Xezbeth
442:Xezbeth
400:Natg 19
382:chatter
349:Natg 19
329:Natg 19
309:Natg 19
289:Natg 19
269:Natg 19
233:WP refs
221:scholar
159:protect
154:history
104:New to
67:Natg 19
907:WP:WEB
797:umbolo
723:WP:JDL
205:Google
163:delete
814:Note:
536:Plus
248:JSTOR
209:books
193:Stats
180:views
172:watch
168:links
16:<
1010:talk
1002:Keep
984:JC7V
978:Keep
968:talk
924:Keep
915:talk
903:this
895:Keep
863:Keep
850:talk
818:this
750:and
731:talk
717:and
693:talk
685:Keep
667:Keep
658:talk
650:Keep
637:talk
618:talk
604:Keep
592:5969
589:Onel
578:and
521:talk
511:and
496:talk
484:Keep
472:Keep
463:talk
455:Keep
446:talk
438:Keep
423:talk
404:talk
370:Nate
362:Keep
353:talk
333:talk
313:talk
293:talk
273:talk
241:FENS
215:news
176:logs
150:talk
146:edit
71:talk
56:and
50:keep
803:^^^
678:😜
551:😜
255:TWL
184:– (
1012:)
950:)
946:•
917:)
888:)
882:,
852:)
833:)
829:•
821:—
766:)
762:•
746:,
733:)
695:)
660:)
639:)
620:)
523:)
498:)
465:)
448:)
425:)
406:)
355:)
335:)
327:.
315:)
307:.
295:)
287:.
275:)
235:)
178:|
174:|
170:|
166:|
161:|
157:|
152:|
148:|
73:)
1008:(
970:)
966:(
948:c
944:t
942:(
913:(
885:ν
879:π
876:(
848:(
831:c
827:t
825:(
794:w
764:c
760:t
758:(
729:(
691:(
672:—
656:(
635:(
616:(
582:.
545:—
519:(
494:(
461:(
444:(
421:(
402:(
385:)
379:(
375:•
351:(
331:(
311:(
291:(
271:(
259:)
251:·
245:·
237:·
230:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
207:(
199:(
196:)
189:·
182:)
144:(
129:)
125:(
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.