Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/The Lickets (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

215:
I would like to nominate this page for deletion, or some kind of modification. I am one of the members of this band and I wrote most of the content in 2008. It isn’t accurate to describe the band this way, since it ignores the previous history and later history of the band and was mostly made in late
363:
I still think that this should come down, but I think my original intention in making this page was simple playfulness, being excited about the band, but also to try to assert that sources of information like independent radio, blogs and independent journals can bypass mainstream critical and social
219:
It was nominated and survived a deletion request, and contributors have added to it, but it is still inaccurate. The only other solution would be to edit the content to account for the previous 8 years to 2009, and the last 6 years of this project, and with my understanding of wikipedia now, I think
411:
If fixing is an option, that would of course be ideal, but since so much of it (all of it from what I can tell at a glance) was generated by one of the subjects it would probably be best to start from scratch, not only to adjust the tone but to correct details that really only a band member would
364:
validation often achieved through marketing. There aren't any sources that cover music like Sound Projector, Textura, Freak Zone, college radio, and things like Lost at E Minor, and these have been the only places the Lickets, and many, many other projects have had any support.
216:
2008 with a misunderstanding of the intent and nature of wikipedia. Also, one of the core criticisms of the page seems to be that the tone or style does not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on wikipedia, which I absolutely agree with.
386:, not delete it. But that said, an unusual request is not an unreasonable one, it seems a harmless request and the band's notability is borderline, so I think we should do the decent thing and honor the request. 184: 83: 268: 448:
Updated. It's now accurate and I believe the tone is appropriate now, so I withdraw my desire to delete the page, but if this isn't acceptable I absolutely understand. Thanks so much.
290: 244: 137: 55:, you'll obeserve that the comments signed "Mitch Greer" and those signed "Spaceagecrystal" are really the same user. Treating this as "nomination withdrawn by proposer". -- 178: 144: 78: 17: 471: 110: 105: 479: 457: 443: 421: 405: 373: 355: 326: 302: 282: 258: 229: 62: 317:, if there is no consensus after standard listing periods (including relists), then this discussion may be closed as delete. 114: 199: 314: 166: 97: 498: 40: 453: 439: 417: 369: 225: 160: 494: 156: 36: 240: 382:, I guess. It's an unusual request, and general practice for an outdated or inaccurate article is to 467: 449: 435: 413: 365: 253: 221: 431: 383: 52:. Following the thread here is a little confusing, but if you walk through the history (especially, 277: 206: 192: 336: 59: 298: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
493:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
474: 101: 434:, I'm going to go ahead and update it to reflect the current and past history of the band. 248: 172: 427: 387: 272: 351: 322: 56: 412:
know. Apologies if this formatting isn't correct, I'm still very new to wikipedia.
294: 131: 93: 68: 339:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
347: 318: 487:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
220:
it’s inappropriate for a member of the band to update it.
269:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
245:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 20
127: 123: 119: 53: 191: 346:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 239:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
205: 84:Articles for deletion/The Lickets (2nd nomination) 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 501:). No further edits should be made to this page. 291:list of California-related deletion discussions 8: 289:Note: This debate has been included in the 267:Note: This debate has been included in the 466:Since it has been extensively rewritten by 288: 266: 76: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 75: 426:Ok, so based on the feedback from 24: 79:Articles for deletion/The Lickets 1: 243:). I have transcluded it to 518: 458:21:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 444:20:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 422:04:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 406:03:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 374:23:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 356:02:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 327:02:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 303:13:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC) 283:04:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 259:04:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 230:04:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC) 480:01:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC) 63:01:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC) 490:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 430:with the suggestion to 311:Note to closing admin: 74:AfDs for this article: 315:WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE 237:Automated comment: 48:The result was 473: 358: 305: 285: 261: 509: 492: 470: 403: 400: 397: 394: 345: 341: 280: 275: 251: 235: 210: 209: 195: 147: 135: 117: 34: 517: 516: 512: 511: 510: 508: 507: 506: 505: 499:deletion review 488: 468:Spaceagecrystal 450:Spaceagecrystal 436:Spaceagecrystal 401: 398: 395: 392: 334: 278: 273: 257: 249: 152: 143: 108: 92: 89: 72: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 515: 513: 504: 503: 483: 482: 428:Andrew Lenahan 409: 408: 388:Andrew Lenahan 361: 360: 359: 343: 342: 331: 330: 329: 307: 306: 286: 263: 262: 255: 213: 212: 149: 88: 87: 86: 81: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 514: 502: 500: 496: 491: 485: 484: 481: 478: 477: 472: 469: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 455: 451: 446: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 424: 423: 419: 415: 407: 404: 389: 385: 381: 378: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 357: 353: 349: 344: 340: 338: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 284: 281: 276: 270: 265: 264: 260: 254: 252: 246: 242: 238: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 217: 208: 204: 201: 198: 194: 190: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 158: 155: 154:Find sources: 150: 146: 142: 139: 133: 129: 125: 121: 116: 112: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 90: 85: 82: 80: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 58: 54: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 489: 486: 475: 463: 447: 425: 410: 391: 379: 362: 335: 310: 236: 218: 214: 202: 196: 188: 181: 175: 169: 163: 153: 140: 49: 47: 31: 28: 476:victor falk 414:Mitch Greer 366:Mitch Greer 222:Mitch Greer 179:free images 94:The Lickets 69:The Lickets 279:talk to me 250:cyberbot I 495:talk page 295:• Gene93k 274:Jinkinson 37:talk page 497:or in a 337:Relisted 138:View log 57:RoySmith 39:or in a 185:WP refs 173:scholar 111:protect 106:history 432:fix it 384:fix it 380:Delete 256:Online 241:step 3 157:Google 115:delete 60:(talk) 200:JSTOR 161:books 145:Stats 132:views 124:watch 120:links 16:< 464:Keep 454:talk 440:talk 418:talk 370:talk 352:talk 323:talk 313:Per 299:talk 247:. — 226:talk 193:FENS 167:news 128:logs 102:talk 98:edit 50:keep 399:bli 348:Mz7 319:Mz7 207:TWL 136:– ( 456:) 442:) 420:) 402:nd 396:ar 393:St 390:- 372:) 354:) 325:) 301:) 293:. 271:. 228:) 187:) 130:| 126:| 122:| 118:| 113:| 109:| 104:| 100:| 452:( 438:( 416:( 368:( 350:( 321:( 297:( 224:( 211:) 203:· 197:· 189:· 182:· 176:· 170:· 164:· 159:( 151:( 148:) 141:· 134:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

RoySmith
(talk)
01:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
The Lickets
Articles for deletion/The Lickets
Articles for deletion/The Lickets (2nd nomination)
The Lickets
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.