260:. Internet searches for more coverage about the subject in reliable sources were unsuccessful, and specifically searching Google Scholar and ResearchGate for both the subject and their works did not leave me with the impression that the subject is widely cited or otherwise had a significant impact in their field. That having been said, search engines can be finicky about finding evidence of citations, so I would welcome any evidence that demonstrates that Burke has had a wide impact or otherwise meets
623:
some students who were both influenced by him and who are influential. Who are they and what did they write about? You have told us he was influential, show us! (Without considerable improvement with secondary referencing I think the article should be deleted, being based on insufficient sources). So far it is a simple paraphrase of the material on the The
Wynnewood Institute webpages, and hence, essentially, advertising.
496:
his work; The sentence about his importance in propagation of ideas is not supported (organising a conference does not mean that someone was/is instrumental in propagating ideas); many lecturers write textbooks, so some evidence that his is widely used. As yet, there is no evidence that Burke is noteworthy.
851:
book in a respectable journal (Shuster, Arthur, and Thomas
Patrick Burke. āThe Journal of Politics.ā The Journal of Politics, vol. 74, no. 1, 2012, p. e9. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1017/s0022381611001472.) it is, however, the sole book review I was able to locate. One book review ā notability.
283:
I will make a case for stronger claim to notability. To start: 1. There are more citations in academic journals as well as reviews of his books. How many citations or mentions of the subject's work would be considered notable? Should I provide the citations here or elsewhere? 2. He wrote a religious
622:
Apart from Burke/s publications, this article is based on a single source (The
Wynnewood Institute webpage). If the man was/is influential surely his work is discussed in newspapers. Equally, he was professor of religion at Temple college for nearly 30 years,so if he was "influential" he surely had
495:
Thanks, (for the indication that an advertising company is paying you. I didn't manage to read your userpage at the time) If this article is not to be deleted: some ISBNs for the books or links to show that they actually exist would be good; some articles and some evidence that people are using the
850:
Noting that two editors have been hard at work tightening the page, I took another look. the page still lacks so much as a single reliable, secondary source. And yet he had a long university teaching career and wrote books. I took his name to JSTOR and found a very respectful review of a recent
827:
He certainly sounds like he ought to be notable - books, Institute, but I can't source him. No problem finding others with this name (Ensign Thomas
Patrick Burke, of the 16th Regiment) a Napoleonic era soldierĀ ; and the Thomas Patrick Burke who committed a notorious kidnap/murder (O'CONNELL
872:
after having similar search results to E.M.Gregory. There is no question that the subject wrote and edited things. But notability on
Knowledge (XXG) is not based on output. Notability here is based on significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources (see
722:
could you please clarify your !vote? You've bolded a !vote in three different comments, and it looks like another editor has redacted your latest, so it would be helpful to strike the !votes you don't endorse, and clarify your current position.
480:
I interpreted something I'd read to mean that disclosing I am paid to edit on my userpage suffices. Apparently not, and I apologize for not following the procedure properly. I was hired by a company, Syndicate
Strategies, to write the
595:
209:
737:
My previous comments were not votes, but (conflicting) arguments for both keep and delete. He is certainly not an influential thinker, but I think his widespread availablity in libraries does make him notable.
386:
781:
that discuss your career, your ideas, your books and/or your impact. Many academics have useful, honourable careers without being notable. The mere fact of publishing books and articles does not confer
304:
Wiley-Blackwell. This textbook would seem to be a compilation more than an original work. Google scholar says it has been cited 79 times, but this could be for the "texts" rather than for Burke's work??
641:
I will gather more reviews of his works and links to articles he has written. I hadn't realized that reviews of his books in academic journals would be valuable to the article. Is there a deadline?
751:
I clarified my earlier "votes" by unbolding the keep and delete in the earlier comments, rather than striking out. (Thye were not votes and therefore did not need to be struck out)
444:
162:
589:
203:
284:
text titled The Major
Religions that is widely held/used. Does that factor in to the criteria at all? *Please note that I created the article as a work for hire. Thank you.--
405:
828:
KIDNAPPER DIES: Washington
Reveals Passing of Burke in Pennsylvania Prison, New York Times (1923-Current file); New York, N.Y. 21 Dec 1937: 48.). I considered a merge to
424:
367:
94:
325:āthe textbook is certainly a point in Burke's favor, although I wasn't able to quickly find any sources that verified that it is particularly widely used.
109:
169:
135:
130:
690:
He appears to be sufficiently notable. See e.g., his library IDs in the authority control, as well as his books (frequently written with others).
139:
122:
89:
82:
17:
610:
224:
577:
191:
522:
Ok. OCLC links to most of his books were included, and I have now added the ISBNs (for those that were published after 1970).--
103:
99:
661:
321:
You can make edits to the article and then just summarize your additions here. As far as what "counts", I'd read through
907:
40:
571:
185:
890:
860:
841:
809:
791:
760:
746:
732:
707:
679:
650:
632:
558:
531:
517:
490:
475:
456:
436:
416:
397:
378:
354:
336:
314:
293:
275:
64:
805:
756:
742:
695:
646:
628:
567:
554:
527:
513:
501:
486:
471:
350:
310:
289:
181:
126:
829:
253:
617:
231:
832:, but it doesn't look notable either. ( I did find a handful of events listings for lectures back in2007.)
642:
523:
482:
463:
346:
285:
118:
70:
322:
261:
257:
249:
903:
856:
837:
787:
703:
432:
36:
801:
752:
738:
717:
691:
675:
624:
550:
509:
497:
467:
306:
245:
603:
217:
770:
583:
197:
886:
728:
452:
345:, and meant for textbook use, though I do not know where to retrieve stats on assigned reading.--
409:
390:
371:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
902:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
878:
877:), which this subject does not have, or on passing a more specific notability guideline like
773:
because, as you say, "not an influential thinker." The only way to pass those guidelines or
766:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
852:
833:
783:
699:
428:
874:
774:
241:
672:
778:
504:) 20:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC) (I see his textbook is used as a reference at least in
547:
55:
466:, states that he was hired to produce the article, he should indicate who hired him.
882:
724:
448:
329:
268:
156:
546:
A useful source to flesh out the article & support a keep argument might be
256:, which doesn't appear to be a notable enough research institution to satisfy
505:
342:
240:
Non-notable academic. Provided sources do not demonstrate notability per
898:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
52:. It looks like there just isn't enough in the way of sources.
664:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
387:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
548:
OCLC World cat: Burke, T. Patrick (Thomas
Patrick) 1934-
152:
148:
144:
602:
216:
765:
Many, actually, most academics fail guidelines like
698:) 21:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC) one iVote per editor.
670:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
616:
230:
445:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
910:). No further edits should be made to this page.
443:Note: This discussion has been included in the
423:Note: This discussion has been included in the
404:Note: This discussion has been included in the
385:Note: This discussion has been included in the
366:Note: This discussion has been included in the
302:The major religions: An introduction with texts.
881:, which this subject most assuredly does not.
406:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
252:. The subject is the founder and president of
425:list of Religion-related deletion discussions
8:
777:is to have multiple SECONDARY and TERTIRAY
368:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
442:
422:
403:
384:
365:
462:Given that the author of the article,
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
341:Thank you. It is held at over
1:
65:09:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
891:23:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
861:23:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
842:13:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
810:03:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
792:14:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
761:01:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
747:00:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
733:23:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
708:13:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
680:11:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
651:14:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
633:03:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
559:08:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
532:14:33, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
518:20:36, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
491:13:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
476:06:33, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
457:18:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
437:00:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
417:22:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
398:22:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
379:22:21, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
355:13:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
337:00:19, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
315:20:30, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
294:23:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
276:20:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
927:
900:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
830:The Wynnewood Institute
254:The Wynnewood Institute
300:Burke, T. P. (2004).
83:Articles for deletion
464:User:DiamondRemley39
119:Thomas Patrick Burke
71:Thomas Patrick Burke
506:some 448 libraries
796:Changing my vote.
682:
459:
439:
419:
400:
381:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
918:
721:
669:
667:
665:
621:
620:
606:
414:
395:
376:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
926:
925:
921:
920:
919:
917:
916:
915:
914:
908:deletion review
802:MargaretRDonald
753:MargaretRDonald
739:MargaretRDonald
718:MargaretRDonald
715:
692:MargaretRDonald
683:
660:
658:
643:DiamondRemley39
625:MargaretRDonald
563:
551:MargaretRDonald
524:DiamondRemley39
510:MargaretRDonald
498:MargaretRDonald
483:DiamondRemley39
468:MargaretRDonald
410:
391:
372:
347:DiamondRemley39
328:
307:MargaretRDonald
286:DiamondRemley39
267:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
924:
922:
913:
912:
894:
893:
866:
865:
864:
863:
845:
844:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
794:
668:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
636:
635:
561:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
440:
420:
401:
382:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
326:
319:
318:
317:
265:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
923:
911:
909:
905:
901:
896:
895:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
871:
868:
867:
862:
858:
854:
849:
848:
847:
846:
843:
839:
835:
831:
826:
823:
822:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
793:
789:
785:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
730:
726:
719:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
688:
681:
678:
677:
674:
666:
663:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
638:
637:
634:
630:
626:
619:
615:
612:
609:
605:
601:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
569:
566:
565:Find sources:
562:
560:
556:
552:
549:
545:
544:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
458:
454:
450:
446:
441:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
418:
415:
413:
407:
402:
399:
396:
394:
388:
383:
380:
377:
375:
369:
364:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:500 libraries
340:
339:
338:
335:
334:
333:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
303:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
273:
272:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
899:
897:
869:
824:
797:
686:
685:
684:
671:
659:
613:
607:
599:
592:
586:
580:
574:
564:
412:CAPTAIN RAJU
411:
393:CAPTAIN RAJU
392:
374:CAPTAIN RAJU
373:
331:
330:
323:WP:NACADEMIC
301:
270:
269:
262:WP:NACADEMIC
258:WP:NACADEMIC
250:WP:NACADEMIC
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
853:E.M.Gregory
834:E.M.Gregory
784:E.M.Gregory
782:notability.
700:E.M.Gregory
590:free images
429:IntoThinAir
204:free images
481:article.--
246:WP:NAUTHOR
58:Sandstein
904:talk page
771:WP:AUTHOR
37:talk page
906:or in a
883:Bakazaka
725:Bakazaka
662:Relisted
449:Thsmi002
332:Rosguill
327:signed,
271:Rosguill
266:signed,
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
879:WP:PROF
767:WP:PROF
596:WPĀ refs
584:scholar
210:WPĀ refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
875:WP:GNG
870:Delete
825:Delete
798:Delete
775:WP:GNG
676:Sailor
568:Google
242:WP:GNG
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
779:WP:RS
611:JSTOR
572:books
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
887:talk
857:talk
838:talk
806:talk
788:talk
757:talk
743:talk
729:talk
704:talk
696:talk
687:keep
647:talk
629:talk
604:FENS
578:news
555:talk
528:talk
514:talk
502:talk
487:talk
472:talk
453:talk
433:talk
351:talk
311:talk
290:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
673:Sam
618:TWL
508:).
232:TWL
161:ā (
889:)
859:)
840:)
808:)
800:.
790:)
769:,
759:)
745:)
731:)
706:)
649:)
631:)
598:)
557:)
530:)
516:)
489:)
474:)
455:)
447:.
435:)
427:.
408:.
389:.
370:.
353:)
313:)
292:)
264:.
248:,
244:,
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
885:(
855:(
836:(
804:(
786:(
755:(
741:(
727:(
720::
716:@
702:(
694:(
645:(
627:(
614:Ā·
608:Ā·
600:Ā·
593:Ā·
587:Ā·
581:Ā·
575:Ā·
570:(
553:(
526:(
512:(
500:(
485:(
470:(
451:(
431:(
349:(
309:(
288:(
236:)
228:Ā·
222:Ā·
214:Ā·
207:Ā·
201:Ā·
195:Ā·
189:Ā·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:Ā·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.