Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Thomas Salme - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

921:"Another issue arises when an individual plays a major role in a minor event. In this case, it is not generally appropriate to have an article on both the person and the event. Generally in this case, the name of the person should redirect to the article on the incident For example, Steve Bartman redirects to Steve Bartman incident. In some cases, however, a person famous for only one event may be more widely known than the event itself, for example, the Tank Man. In such cases, the article about the event may be most appropriately named for the person involved." 541:, per nomination. I have just reported what I consider to be promotional editing in this article at WP:ANI, where I remarked on the questionable notability of someone who's sole evidence of 'notability' (notoriety would be a better word) is to be found in a few short press articles from the time of his conviction. Evidence elsewhere on the interwebs seems to indicate that Salme is keen on promoting himself, and that he thinks that his story makes him deserving of further publicity, but I see no reason why Knowledge (XXG) should assist him in that. 81: 661:. While we do prefer English language sources, Swedish language sources may be used as well. The book (in Swedish) seems to pass NBOOK on Swedish sources. The incident/crime/event (flying without a license) - passes NEVENT/NCRIME even just with English sources (though the scope of international coverage here is such that a multitude of additional sources in available in other languages as well). 923:. I wouldn't say the latter circumstance arises. But the article could be renamed the "Thomas Salme incident" or such. Alternatively, it could be said that this is a set of incidents, and possibly BLP1E doesn't apply. In any case, the content should be retained, whether retitled or not. I don't know why Nom didn't just consider moving and rephrasing this rather than AfD. 1115:
I've no idea whether the article was originally written as promotion, but I don't feel it reads as such. It certainly doesn't rise to the level to warrant deletion, rather than cleanup. Notability is reasonably well shown, even if not glowingly done. BLP1E seems the most reasonable grounds but you've
790:
I wouldn't call a link to a Google search that merely shows that Salme's book can be found on the google.books website evidence for much in the way of 'major news coverage'. Particularly when the fourth item on Google's list (after three links to their own website) is to a book published in 1737, on
1253:
I linked to an article in English, the connection is made in articles published in Swedish and other languages - I put the Swedish article on the page. The point, however, is that there has been ongoing coverage. But it was the articles that discuss this case as part of a group of fake-credential
1166:
above, if you look at the book on Goodreads & Amazon, it's pretty patchy and doesn't seem to have been curated at all by a publisher, it looks self published although the Google Play edition is definitely by established publisher Norstedts. It's not actually BY him, it's ghosted, although that
1194:
aspects of this pilot's, er... career. Certainly privacy concerns do not have much weight because Salme published a book about the flying with a forged pilots license. But the main thing is, there has been some ONGOING interest in the story over the years. In a book. In articles about the
1340:
Not a OneEvent topic. Article is not about any single event (eg: his arrest), but about his career, covered thinly but adequately. More than sufficient RS to establish N. The lede sentence could be revised to avoid inadvertent impression of BLPIE: "Thomas Salme is a pilot who flew commercial
1093:: My feeling is that this wiki article is in essence promotion for the person and his book. He's already infamous for his self-promotion, and his friends wrote this article for him. Most of the links I find online are passing mentions or mentions of his book(s). Knowledge (XXG) is not for 607:). As evident in even a cursory BEFORE - the incident (a pilot without a flying license - flying for 13 years as first officer and then captain of large passenger carrying civil aircraft (737)) gained very international coverage - continuing coverage - that clearly passes 791:
the subject of 'The Church History of England'. And nor do subsequent items on books published prior to the Thomas Salme in question here ever entering an aircraft cockpit. Or books published since, on subjects such as 'Social Constructionism', or an autobiography of
1066:
this person at all, but about someone else entirely. This person receives a one sentence namecheck at the end, that does not add any actual information about this person's life and works that could have been sourced years ago. It is not continued coverage at all.
823:
I don't think I missed anything 'obvious' from the Google search I saw. Google search does not give consistent results, which is why linking to it isn't a good idea. If you want to cite something as evidence for notability in an AFD discussion, do it properly.
694: 774: 838:
Xe did not miss it. It does not turn up as a search result, for me either; and Google Books does not permit me to search the book for anything. A handwave in the general direction of a search engine, Google Books or otherwise, is
969: 326: 1054:) decrying the book on Facebook. It is not a particularly useful source of information for documenting this article subject's life and works, as it contains little in the way of solid facts. So I read the 568:
This IP has come to my talk page and identified himself as someone who "has been editing Knowledge (XXG) for years (longer than you have, it appears), with a dynamic IP." I will AGF and strike this as he
378: 953: 719: 88: 1411:
Toddst1, do note that this perp self-publicizes his crime, writing a book, and so forth. I can see a NOTPROMO argument for deleting more easily that I can see a PRIVACY argument.
438: 1272:
If 'fake-credential scandals' in general are being discussed in multiple reliable sources, that is a justification for an article on the general subject, rather than this one.
498: 279: 398: 320: 478: 458: 949: 518: 418: 1073:
I think that people need to start actually reading these sources that are being waved around. One needs to actually read the things that one's searches turn up.
211: 1167:
hasn't stopped Blair etc al. But if he is to be notable for the book, it's not a very notable book - and not by him! I keep coming back to Nom's assertion of
844: 226: 1116:
not specified why you think it can't just be moved to being the event and slightly tweaked. BLP1E isn't supposed to remove content from the encyclopedia.
1071:
is a trailer for a television interview with the subject, promoting xyr book, again that does not actually discuss anything else than the original events.
1009: 979: 626:. (I'd further note that Salme has publicized this - so we do not have BLP privacy concerns (nor would BLPCRIME be an issue - as he was convicted)). 286: 957: 706: 1273: 1214: 1213:
I'd have thought that the fact that other people have been caught doing the same thing would make this particular example less noteworthy.
825: 796: 676: 553: 542: 97: 561: 127: 713: 206: 199: 17: 675:
I think people might find your arguments about notability being demonstrated by sources more convincing if you provided a few more.
252: 247: 1196: 256: 710: 1431:
and propose merging this to said page, I would support such a move. It's quite remarkable how many of these there have been.
1428: 1101:, and his putative notability is strictly his one-event stunt -- which may have lasted over time, but it's still one event. 729: 220: 216: 113: 965: 341: 1366:
does not apply. I made some improvements to the article and its references before adding my support to keeping the entry.
1016: 986: 239: 308: 1463: 1058:
source. It's an infomercial for the book that ends with an outright instruction to buy it. I thought to then try the
40: 86:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1254:
scandals that led to a wave of more thorough corporate resume vetting that persuaded me that this is not quite a
1176: 698: 648: 591: 945: 941: 702: 690: 159: 1277: 1218: 1002: 972: 829: 800: 680: 557: 546: 302: 1037: 143: 117: 1195:
tightening of resume vetting in the wake of this and other scandals. And, most recently for similarity to
1106: 792: 366: 298: 102: 1459: 1440: 1436: 1420: 1416: 1402: 1375: 1350: 1332: 1315: 1281: 1267: 1263: 1240: 1222: 1208: 1204: 1180: 1154: 1125: 1121: 1110: 1084: 1041: 1021: 991: 961: 932: 928: 897: 893: 856: 833: 818: 814: 804: 785: 781: 757: 684: 670: 652: 635: 595: 578: 574: 530: 510: 490: 470: 450: 430: 410: 390: 370: 64: 36: 737: 1308: 1172: 744:(given that the subject is mentioned in coverage of subsequent similar cases)). Also trivially meets 644: 587: 1098: 741: 733: 725: 348: 334: 612: 608: 1033: 149: 80: 1384: 1363: 1191: 1168: 1138: 1094: 745: 658: 616: 358: 1397: 1236: 1102: 1080: 852: 753: 666: 631: 620: 526: 506: 486: 466: 446: 426: 406: 386: 362: 243: 195: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1432: 1412: 1371: 1328: 1259: 1200: 1117: 924: 889: 810: 777: 570: 1388: 1359: 1255: 748:- as I've produced two independent non-trivial works on the book (and more are available). 1346: 1302: 1051: 314: 1298: 55: 1149: 1143: 1323:- passes WP:RS and WP:GNG barely but still enough to justify inclusion at this time. 1392: 1232: 1163: 1076: 998: 848: 749: 662: 627: 522: 502: 482: 462: 442: 422: 402: 382: 235: 177: 165: 133: 70: 273: 1097:, and I find this article an embarrassing example of just that. He does not pass 112:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1367: 1324: 940:
He has accrued international and persistent coverage in reliable news sources (
1342: 624: 1001:, whose post I omitted to see but says much of what I tiresomely repeated. 1231:
prove that point? It would seem to demonstrate the opposite, if anything.
724:
This is a trivial pass for NEVENT/NCRIME (meets GNG and furthermore -
795:. Writing a book that Google advertises doesn't make you notable... 603:. Possibly re purpose either to the crime, or to the book by Salme ( 809:
You missed the - quite obvious - good book hit, now added to page.
657:
Yes... And? Your comment has no bearing on notability - please see
1190:
revisiting in the light of comments above, I again considered the
1197:
Fake SAA pilot: How William Chandler flew illegally for 20 years
919:(but consider moving) - reading the relevant paragraph of BLP1E 615:. Further more, Salme has penned a book that would seem to pass 1454:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
75: 106:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 1341:
airliners in Europe for 13 years without a valid license."
379:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
96:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
52:. Or weak keep; at any rate, the article stays for now. 971:), from the incident occurring in 2010 to the present. 605:
En bluffpilots bekännelse: Thomas Salmes 13 år i himlen
269: 265: 261: 722:, but possibly not independent as he works for Lucire) 333: 643:
but this is not the Swedish Knowledge (XXG)... Best
1050:source. It's a report of someone on Facebook (one 347: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1466:). No further edits should be made to this page. 517:Note: This discussion has been included in the 497:Note: This discussion has been included in the 477:Note: This discussion has been included in the 457:Note: This discussion has been included in the 439:list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions 437:Note: This discussion has been included in the 417:Note: This discussion has been included in the 397:Note: This discussion has been included in the 377:Note: This discussion has been included in the 1229:makes no mention of this article subject at all 499:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 1032:- barely notable, but squeaks over the line. 399:list of Aviation-related deletion discussions 126:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 845:User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes 709:(seems the book got translated to Italian - 227:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 479:list of Turkey-related deletion discussions 459:list of Sweden-related deletion discussions 519:list of Crime-related deletion discussions 516: 496: 476: 456: 436: 419:list of Italy-related deletion discussions 416: 396: 376: 100:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 1427:That said, if someone wanted to create a 120:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 888:2 reliably published books to the page. 1429:List of fake pilot credential scandals 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 776:, major international news coverage. 720:also coverage in English on the book 24: 1297:passes our notability guide per 212:Introduction to deletion process 79: 968:, etc) as well as literature ( 1: 116:on the part of others and to 549:) 07:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 202:(AfD)? Read these primers! 1483: 1441:10:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1421:10:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1403:03:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1376:03:57, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1351:12:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 1333:15:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC) 1316:18:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1282:19:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1268:16:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1241:15:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1223:15:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1209:14:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1181:13:38, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1155:09:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1126:08:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1111:01:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 1085:00:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 898:16:10, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 857:15:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 834:14:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 819:14:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 579:22:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC) 65:19:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC) 1042:19:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 1022:13:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 992:13:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 933:11:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 805:17:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 786:11:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 758:09:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 685:09:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 671:09:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 653:08:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 636:07:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 596:07:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 531:07:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 511:07:57, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 491:07:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 471:07:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 451:07:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 431:07:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 411:07:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 391:07:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 371:07:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC) 1456:Please do not modify it. 619:- e.g. coverage here in 32:Please do not modify it. 1227:How does a source that 1062:source. It's actually 740:, and would seem to be 158:; accounts blocked for 128:single-purpose accounts 98:policies and guidelines 623:on the book in 2012 - 562:few or no other edits 200:Articles for deletion 1091:Comment by nominator 730:WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE 564:outside this topic. 793:Sven-Göran Eriksson 110:by counting votes. 89:not a majority vote 1401: 1153: 1024: 723: 621:Svenska Dagbladet 565: 533: 513: 493: 473: 453: 433: 413: 393: 217:Guide to deletion 207:How to contribute 191: 190: 187: 114:assume good faith 63: 1474: 1395: 1314: 1147: 1019: 1014: 1007: 996: 989: 984: 977: 717: 699:Aftonbladet 2012 551: 352: 351: 337: 289: 277: 259: 197: 185: 173: 157: 141: 122: 92:, but instead a 83: 76: 62: 60: 53: 34: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1464:deletion review 1358:as passing the 1301: 1173:Alexandermcnabb 1052:Malin Johansson 1017: 1010: 1003: 987: 980: 973: 645:Alexandermcnabb 588:Alexandermcnabb 294: 285: 250: 234: 231: 194: 175: 163: 147: 131: 118:sign your posts 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1480: 1478: 1469: 1468: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1406: 1405: 1378: 1353: 1335: 1318: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1274:86.143.229.185 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1225: 1215:86.143.229.185 1185: 1184: 1183: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1044: 1027: 1026: 1025: 954:Il Sussidiario 935: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 836: 826:86.143.229.185 797:86.143.229.185 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 714:Expressen 2019 695:book from 2011 677:86.143.229.185 598: 581: 554:86.143.229.185 543:86.143.229.185 535: 534: 514: 494: 474: 454: 434: 414: 394: 355: 354: 291: 230: 229: 224: 214: 209: 192: 189: 188: 84: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1479: 1467: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1451: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1034:Beyond My Ken 1031: 1028: 1023: 1020: 1015: 1013: 1008: 1006: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 990: 985: 983: 978: 976: 970: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 936: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 915: 914: 899: 895: 891: 887: 884:that I added 883: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 858: 854: 850: 846: 843:a citation. 842: 837: 835: 831: 827: 822: 821: 820: 816: 812: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 794: 789: 788: 787: 783: 779: 775: 772: 769: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 721: 715: 711: 708: 707:Panorama 2017 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 655: 654: 650: 646: 642: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 625: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 599: 597: 593: 589: 585: 582: 580: 576: 572: 567: 563: 559: 555: 548: 544: 540: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 515: 512: 508: 504: 500: 495: 492: 488: 484: 480: 475: 472: 468: 464: 460: 455: 452: 448: 444: 440: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 415: 412: 408: 404: 400: 395: 392: 388: 384: 380: 375: 374: 373: 372: 368: 364: 360: 350: 346: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 304: 300: 297: 296:Find sources: 292: 288: 284: 281: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 254: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 232: 228: 225: 222: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 204: 203: 201: 196: 183: 179: 171: 167: 161: 155: 151: 145: 139: 135: 129: 125: 121: 119: 115: 109: 105: 104: 99: 95: 91: 90: 85: 82: 78: 77: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1455: 1453: 1380: 1355: 1337: 1320: 1309: 1303: 1294: 1228: 1187: 1162:Followup to 1159: 1142: 1137:as textbook 1134: 1103:Softlavender 1090: 1075: 1072: 1069:ilSussidario 1068: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1047: 1029: 1012:SerialNumber 1011: 1004: 982:SerialNumber 981: 974: 966:Der Standard 937: 920: 916: 885: 881: 840: 770: 640: 604: 600: 583: 550: 538: 363:Softlavender 357:Non-notable 356: 344: 338: 330: 323: 317: 311: 305: 295: 282: 236:Thomas Salme 193: 181: 169: 160:sockpuppetry 153: 142:; suspected 137: 123: 111: 107: 101: 93: 87: 71:Thomas Salme 57: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 1433:E.M.Gregory 1413:E.M.Gregory 1260:E.M.Gregory 1201:E.M.Gregory 1118:Nosebagbear 1048:AftonBladet 1046:I read the 997:Basically, 962:aftonbladet 925:Nosebagbear 890:E.M.Gregory 811:E.M.Gregory 778:E.M.Gregory 738:WP:GEOSCOPE 586:, per nom. 571:E.M.Gregory 560:) has made 321:free images 1304:Tonereport 1099:WP:NAUTHOR 773:book hits 742:WP:LASTING 734:WP:DIVERSE 726:WP:INDEPTH 94:discussion 58:Sandstein 1460:talk page 1171:... Best 1064:not about 1060:Expressen 950:Telegraph 691:CBS, 2010 613:WP:NCRIME 609:WP:NEVENT 569:requests. 150:canvassed 144:canvassed 103:consensus 37:talk page 1462:or in a 1385:WP:BLP1E 1364:WP:BLPIE 1192:WP:BLP1E 1169:WP:BLP1E 1139:WP:BLP1E 1095:WP:PROMO 1056:Panorama 958:Panorama 746:WP:NBOOK 718:(also - 703:RTL 2016 659:WP:NOENG 617:WP:NBOOK 359:WP:BLP1E 280:View log 221:glossary 182:username 176:{{subst: 170:username 164:{{subst: 154:username 148:{{subst: 138:username 132:{{subst: 39:or in a 1393:Toddst1 1233:Uncle G 1188:comment 1164:Uncle G 1160:Comment 1077:Uncle G 999:Icewhiz 849:Uncle G 750:Icewhiz 689:Sure - 663:Icewhiz 641:Comment 628:Icewhiz 523:Icewhiz 503:Icewhiz 483:Icewhiz 463:Icewhiz 443:Icewhiz 423:Icewhiz 403:Icewhiz 383:Icewhiz 327:WP refs 315:scholar 253:protect 248:history 198:New to 146:users: 1389:WP:GNG 1381:Delete 1368:gidonb 1360:WP:GNG 1325:BabbaQ 1135:Delete 886:a book 584:Delete 539:Delete 299:Google 257:delete 1387:: --> 1343:DonFB 1299:WP:RS 1256:BLP1E 1150:Help! 1018:54129 988:54129 342:JSTOR 303:books 287:Stats 274:views 266:watch 262:links 124:Note: 16:< 1437:talk 1417:talk 1398:talk 1372:talk 1356:Keep 1347:talk 1338:Keep 1329:talk 1321:Keep 1295:Keep 1278:talk 1264:talk 1237:talk 1219:talk 1205:talk 1177:talk 1122:talk 1107:talk 1081:talk 1038:talk 1030:Keep 938:Keep 929:talk 917:Keep 894:talk 882:Note 853:talk 830:talk 815:talk 801:talk 782:talk 771:Keep 754:talk 681:talk 667:talk 649:talk 632:talk 601:Keep 592:talk 575:talk 558:talk 547:talk 527:talk 507:talk 487:talk 467:talk 447:talk 427:talk 407:talk 387:talk 367:talk 335:FENS 309:news 270:logs 244:talk 240:edit 1391:. 1144:Guy 946:RTL 942:CBS 847:. 841:not 712:), 349:TWL 278:– ( 178:csp 174:or 166:csm 134:spa 108:not 1439:) 1419:) 1383:: 1374:) 1362:. 1349:) 1331:) 1280:) 1266:) 1239:) 1221:) 1207:) 1179:) 1141:. 1124:) 1109:) 1083:) 1040:) 1005:—— 975:—— 964:, 960:, 956:, 952:, 948:, 944:, 931:) 896:) 855:) 832:) 817:) 803:) 784:) 756:) 736:, 732:, 728:, 716:. 705:, 701:, 697:, 693:, 683:) 669:) 651:) 634:) 594:) 577:) 552:— 529:) 521:. 509:) 501:. 489:) 481:. 469:) 461:. 449:) 441:. 429:) 421:. 409:) 401:. 389:) 381:. 369:) 361:. 329:) 272:| 268:| 264:| 260:| 255:| 251:| 246:| 242:| 184:}} 172:}} 162:: 156:}} 140:}} 130:: 1435:( 1415:( 1400:) 1396:( 1370:( 1345:( 1327:( 1313:) 1310:☎ 1307:( 1276:( 1262:( 1258:. 1235:( 1217:( 1203:( 1199:. 1175:( 1152:) 1148:( 1120:( 1105:( 1079:( 1036:( 927:( 892:( 851:( 828:( 813:( 799:( 780:( 752:( 679:( 665:( 647:( 630:( 611:/ 590:( 573:( 566:. 556:( 545:( 525:( 505:( 485:( 465:( 445:( 425:( 405:( 385:( 365:( 353:) 345:· 339:· 331:· 324:· 318:· 312:· 306:· 301:( 293:( 290:) 283:· 276:) 238:( 223:) 219:( 186:. 180:| 168:| 152:| 136:|

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
19:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Thomas Salme
Not a vote
not a majority vote
policies and guidelines
consensus
assume good faith
sign your posts
single-purpose accounts
spa
canvassed
canvassed
sockpuppetry
csm
csp

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Thomas Salme
edit
talk
history

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.