250:
compilation of concepts that an editor is subjectively comparing. (For example, a trivial mention from NASA that is referring to something very different from what the article purports to be about.) The only source is another online encyclopedia which isn't a reliable secondary source, and may be
413:
661:
in the newly rewritten form. Effectively, my vote is "delete" the old version per TNT (per reasons outlined by the nom applicable to the nominated version), with no prejudice to a rewrite, but with acknowledgement that the rewrite is already happening.
405:
389:
409:
393:
207:
588:). Besides the sources I mentioned above, the principal source I've used is "The Technology of Omniscience: Past Viewers in Science Fiction"–a 10-page, 4,700-word essay by science fiction author
272:
416:
for other articles I've rewritten in prose form during AfD discussions. As for tertiary sources and notability, there was a discussion on that topic about a year ago that can now be found at
385:
397:
401:
164:
201:
486:
or another more suitable article, unless the rewrite proves to be substantial enough to make a merge not needed. Currently too small to need to exist on its own.
686:
as newly rewritten and extensively sourced by TompaDompa. A little too many redlinks for my taste, but it's now a good article on a demonstrably notable topic.
96:
111:
428:
is roughly 800 words, I think this could work as a stand-alone article. I might change my mind and prefer merging it elsewhere when I'm done expanding.
526:. The article has been significantly rewritten since nomination and many of the above comments. I added the Category:Fictional technology at bottom.
417:
461:
294:
91:
84:
17:
362:, and an expansion might address the AFD issues, or at least get it into a mergeable state. Just remember that notability calls for
609:
137:
132:
457:
141:
105:
101:
222:
189:
124:
733:
556:
299:
40:
168:
246:
guideline. There aren't reliable references to the concept of a "time viewer", making me concerned that this is an
617:
62:
183:
589:
568:
358:, and it feels close enough to deletion that a discussion felt like a better idea. Thanks for attempting a
243:
621:
547:
per TTN. The rewrite is an improvement. But it's all cited to the same source, and I'm not sure that it's
322:. So this is clearly notable. I'll start rewriting it as a proper prose article about the topic shortly.
729:
637:
598:
in 2000, all about time viewers. There is also an extended discussion of time viewers on pages 57–60 of
564:
179:
36:
716:
695:
674:
649:
572:
552:
548:
539:
514:
495:
473:
437:
379:
367:
331:
284:
264:
66:
691:
645:
641:
594:
469:
433:
429:
327:
323:
58:
343:
229:
215:
560:
363:
239:
375:
280:
260:
712:
668:
318:
312:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
600:
347:
307:
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
128:
704:
613:
359:
351:
687:
629:
465:
252:
247:
195:
303:
625:
605:
580:
As promised, I've rewritten the article in prose form and expanded it significantly (
536:
510:
491:
371:
276:
256:
452:, "a passive form of time machine" it could be redirected to become a subsection of
708:
664:
453:
52:. There is consensus that the added sources are sufficient to showcase notability.
158:
460:. If real life claims of time viewing are the focus, it could be a subsection of
483:
450:
355:
120:
72:
354:
and I agree with them, but I'm left with something that would be redirected to
414:
WP:Articles for deletion/Loch Ness
Monster in popular culture (2nd nomination)
616:. To me it's also pretty clear that this shouldn't be merged, though using
633:
528:
506:
487:
449:
This could go a couple ways. If a time viewer is, as one source puts it
601:
Time
Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction
608:. I don't think it can be seriously disputed that this topic has the
624:
in addition to this article is of course always an option. I invite
406:
WP:Articles for deletion/Genies in popular culture (2nd nomination)
426:
All the Wonder that Would Be: Exploring Past
Notions of the Future
390:
WP:Articles for deletion/Earth in science fiction (2nd nomination)
319:
All the Wonder that Would Be: Exploring Past
Notions of the Future
410:
WP:Articles for deletion/Battle of
Thermopylae in popular culture
339:
I'm always cautious about an edit that cuts an article down to a
420:. Anyway, I'll see how much I can expand it. Since the entry in
310:) is a subject-matter expert. The concept also gets an entry in
724:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
394:
WP:Articles for deletion/Space stations and habitats in fiction
384:
I think it's safe to say that this isn't my first rodeo. See
559:
from several entries, which doesn't meet the requirement of
585:
581:
340:
273:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
154:
150:
146:
214:
302:
for science fiction concepts, and even if it weren't
228:
456:, or if a literary context is the primary focus,
386:WP:Articles for deletion/Eco-terrorism in fiction
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
736:). No further edits should be made to this page.
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
398:WP:Articles for deletion/Supernovae in fiction
238:Couldn't find reliable secondary sources with
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
402:WP:Articles for deletion/Neptune in fiction
270:
424:is roughly 1400 words and the section in
418:WT:Notability/Archive 73#Tertiary sources
306:(who wrote the entry in question, see
251:circularly pulling material from this
665:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
462:Time travel claims and urban legends
555:source and brings together several
422:The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
295:The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
24:
563:from reliable secondary sources.
316:as well as a page and a half in
97:Introduction to deletion process
458:List of time travel in fiction
1:
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
753:
717:14:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
67:23:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
696:20:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
675:09:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
650:02:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
573:16:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
540:11:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
515:21:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
496:22:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
474:21:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
438:21:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
380:20:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
346:without discussion. Your
332:19:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
285:18:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
265:18:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
255:Knowledge (XXG) article.
726:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
610:WP:Significant coverage
640:to take another look.
622:Time travel in fiction
169:edits since nomination
85:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
557:WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS
551:. Even so, it's a
350:cuts are taken in
300:WP:Reliable source
612:required to meet
582:nominated version
287:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
744:
671:
618:WP:Summary style
538:
533:
505:Seems fine now.
233:
232:
218:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
752:
751:
747:
746:
745:
743:
742:
741:
740:
734:deletion review
673:
669:
586:current version
529:
527:
313:Brave New Words
298:is certainly a
175:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
59:Devonian Wombat
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
750:
748:
739:
738:
720:
719:
698:
680:
679:
678:
677:
663:
653:
652:
590:Stephen Baxter
575:
542:
520:
519:
518:
517:
500:
499:
476:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
304:David Langford
288:
236:
235:
172:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
749:
737:
735:
731:
727:
722:
721:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
699:
697:
693:
689:
685:
682:
681:
676:
672:
666:
660:
657:
656:
655:
654:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:Shooterwalker
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:Paul J. Nahin
603:
602:
597:
596:
592:published in
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
565:Shooterwalker
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
541:
537:
534:
532:
525:
522:
521:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
445:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:sources, not
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
338:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
321:
320:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
292:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
245:
244:WP:NOTABILITY
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
170:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
725:
723:
700:
688:- LuckyLouie
683:
658:
599:
593:
577:
544:
530:
523:
479:
478:
466:- LuckyLouie
454:time machine
446:
425:
421:
336:
317:
311:
293:
290:
242:to meet the
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
553:WP:TERTIARY
549:WP:RELIABLE
484:Time travel
368:WP:TERTIARY
356:time travel
202:free images
121:Time viewer
73:Time viewer
670:reply here
642:TompaDompa
630:LuckyLouie
595:Foundation
430:TompaDompa
352:good faith
344:WP:DICTDEF
324:TompaDompa
730:talk page
561:WP:SIGCOV
364:secondary
240:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
732:or in a
626:Jontesta
620:at e.g.
372:Jontesta
341:one line
277:Jontesta
257:Jontesta
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
709:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ
578:Comment
447:Comment
348:WP:BOLD
337:Comment
208:WP refs
196:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
705:WP:HEY
636:, and
614:WP:GNG
412:, and
360:WP:TNT
180:Google
142:delete
545:Merge
480:Merge
253:WP:OR
248:WP:OR
223:JSTOR
184:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
703:Per
701:Keep
692:talk
684:Keep
659:Keep
646:talk
584:vs.
569:talk
524:Keep
511:talk
492:talk
470:talk
434:talk
376:talk
328:talk
308:here
291:Keep
281:talk
261:talk
216:FENS
190:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
634:TTN
604:by
531:5Q5
507:TTN
488:TTN
482:to
230:TWL
163:– (
715:)
707:.
694:)
648:)
632:,
628:,
571:)
513:)
494:)
472:)
464:.
436:)
408:,
404:,
400:,
396:,
392:,
388:,
378:)
370:.
330:)
283:)
275:.
263:)
210:)
167:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
713:ᴛ
711:(
690:(
667:|
644:(
567:(
535:|
509:(
490:(
468:(
432:(
374:(
326:(
279:(
259:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.