Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Timeline of STS-115 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

300:
edited text. The GFDL generally requires a record of contributions be kept in order to keep compliant with the license, and that's why in cases where you merge something, you usually do a redirect. The only way you could get around it would be if you were the only significant contributor, which I assume is not the case. I'm also not sure if it's the case that you're copying mission notes directly from NASA, which would also be acceptable. In terms of reducing clutter on Knowledge (XXG), it's really not worth worrying about, as the storage requirements are too vast for the individual to matter with the aggregate. Let's assume it takes 1 megabyte of space to keep this page around. Last year about this time, the database was 1.2 Terabytes
303:. Since one terabyte is one million megabytes, that means we could have over a million copies of this one article and still have room for well...a lot. It's not worth worrying about for that reason. (Especially since in reality, the page probably takes up a tenth or less of that size). Yes, eventually there will be problems with the size of Knowledge (XXG), but it's not going to be handled by boiling tea cups of the ocean with a candle. 318:
It was just a mistake on my part for not thinking it through, again my most abject apologies. I'd appreciate if someone could handle the redirect, and remove the AFD notice, and feel free to remove my addition, and I'll just try and find a way to re-word everything, without losing all the NASA URL references while doing it. So much for my first foray into AfD, lol.
327:
The thing is, if there's any significant edits done (even formatting) once it gets away from NASA (which is a federal agency and thus public domain), you'd run afoul of the GFDL attribution. Since there are in-line references, I'd say that is your problem, and as such, the best thing to do is to use
317:
Understood, and of course, I knew that copying and pasting entire articles is a no-no, but basically this is a list of activities as stated from NASA's end of day Status Reports, nothing changed in what the crew did, or how they did it, so it makes it quite difficult to even attempt to "rewrite" it.
282:
I actually had nearly half of the mission notes written up by hand, and then I found the timeline page, so yes I transferred it as written. However, when pages are merged that contain timeline information that didn't change between the versions, how is the merge handled? I apologize if I merged it
299:
If you want something deleted in its current form, but used elsewhere, the appropriate way to do it is to work from the actual sources involved, and to not involve any other edits on Knowledge (XXG). Though you can get information such as a list of those references from it, you shouldn't copy the
337:
I agree with you FrozenPurpleCube, and I completely understand. Again my apologies for handling it in the wrong way. I'd appreciate anyone who can take care of the redirect/merge, as I guess I still don't understand: If you redirect, are you allowed to "copy/paste" merge, or do you still have to
283:
wrong, and I'd be happy to learn the proper way to merge information such as this. Also, it seems that a redirect is the most appropriate choice, so my apologies for not considering that, I was thinking more of reducing "clutter" from Knowledge (XXG), and I apologize. Thanks.
382:
Yeap. If you copy/paste stuff, the edit history has to be preserved. Leave a note on the talk page of the new page as to where to find the edit history. As of now, this cannot be closed because there is still a "Delete" vote on the board and thus, would not qualify for a
344:
When I redirect/merge, what I do is make sure to note it in the edit summary that I'm copying from a given location, both when I'm pasting over and I'm making the redirect. There is no need to further rewrite it (except for whatever cleanup issues are appropriate). See
289:
Basically you cannot copy content from article to another. This is because the revision history must be maintained, otherwise the GFDL is being violated. The 'merge' is handled by re-writing the data yourself from the external sources and deleting the original
156:
is working to standardize all the mission articles into the same format, so the timeline should remain with the mission page, not as a separate article. While STS-115 will need pruning, this orphaned article can probably be purged. Notices placed on
268:
How was the merge done? Did you copy from this page? That's the way it looks to me, in which case, a deletion is not appropriate, but rather a redirect in order to satisfy the attribution requirements of the GFDL.
395:
Actually, I think it can, since the delete argument can be dismissed as ignorant of the merge. But I'll ask that person to strike their comment unless they feel it doesn't belong as part of STS-115.
121: 338:
re-write the entire thing? If someone would like to remove the AfD, and do whatever is needed, I'll be happy to attempt to rewrite it, if that's required.
162: 94: 89: 153: 98: 81: 239: 17: 222: 444: 36: 180:. Since you've merge the articles, I don't see how this article serves a purpose. It's far from encyclopedic, anyway 429: 400: 390: 373: 353: 339: 332: 319: 307: 294: 284: 273: 256: 242: 226: 197: 170: 63: 328:
the merge/redirect solution. It's far less work, and there's no real benefit from doing things the harder way.
443:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
85: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
397: 350: 329: 304: 270: 422: 238:. That way if something is missed, others can still look over the information, if they try hard enough. -- 190: 58: 218: 148:, and this page can be deleted. It has been orphaned since March 2007. The only link to the page is 141: 77: 69: 369:
Since info is merged - Stuff like this has historic notability and is covered by reliable sources
346: 415: 183: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
149: 210: 384: 48:
for GFDL compliance as information from this article had been substantially merged into
166: 158: 414:
The only reason I said "Delete" is because the OP had already merged the subject.
251:
Good idea, there is one other "Timeline" article that could use that as well, for
115: 291: 53: 387: 370: 301: 52:
prior to nomination and to retain any information for future reference.
252: 235: 206: 145: 137: 133: 129: 49: 437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111: 107: 103: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 447:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 154:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Space_missions 128:To standardize shuttle missions, (see 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 240:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 1: 430:15:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 401:05:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 391:05:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 374:04:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 354:06:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 340:05:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 333:04:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 320:04:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 308:03:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 295:03:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 285:02:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 274:01:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 257:01:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 243:01:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 227:01:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 198:00:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 171:00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 152:which can also be removed. 64:19:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 464: 255:. Thanks for the input! 440:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 169:(current flight). 142:Timeline of STS-115 78:Timeline of STS-115 70:Timeline of STS-115 163:Project talk page 455: 442: 426: 419: 398:FrozenPurpleCube 351:FrozenPurpleCube 349:for the steps. 330:FrozenPurpleCube 305:FrozenPurpleCube 271:FrozenPurpleCube 214: 213:Dennis The Tiger 194: 187: 150:STS-115 Timeline 140:) I have merged 119: 101: 34: 463: 462: 458: 457: 456: 454: 453: 452: 451: 445:deletion review 438: 424: 417: 212: 192: 185: 92: 76: 73: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 461: 459: 450: 449: 433: 432: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 377: 376: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 297: 277: 276: 262: 261: 260: 259: 246: 245: 229: 200: 126: 125: 72: 67: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 460: 448: 446: 441: 435: 434: 431: 428: 427: 421: 420: 413: 410: 409: 402: 399: 394: 393: 392: 389: 386: 381: 380: 379: 378: 375: 372: 368: 365: 364: 355: 352: 348: 343: 342: 341: 336: 335: 334: 331: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 309: 306: 302: 298: 296: 293: 288: 287: 286: 281: 280: 279: 278: 275: 272: 267: 264: 263: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 247: 244: 241: 237: 233: 230: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 208: 204: 201: 199: 196: 195: 189: 188: 181: 179: 175: 174: 173: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 123: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 61: 57: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 439: 436: 423: 416: 411: 366: 316: 265: 231: 211: 202: 191: 184: 177: 176: 167:Talk:STS-118 159:Talk:STS-115 127: 59: 54: 45: 43: 31: 28: 385:speedy keep 165:, and on 412:Redirect 367:Redirect 347:WP:MERGE 266:Question 232:Redirect 203:Redirect 122:View log 46:redirect 290:page.-- 253:STS-121 236:STS-115 207:STS-115 146:STS-115 138:STS-118 134:STS-117 130:STS-116 95:protect 90:history 50:STS-115 425:Luftan 292:Dacium 193:Luftan 178:Delete 161:, the 99:delete 418:James 388:Corpx 371:Corpx 223:stuff 209:. -- 186:James 144:into 116:views 108:watch 104:links 16:< 221:and 219:Rawr 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 234:to 205:to 120:– ( 60:ʏɑɴ 55:ɑʀк 225:) 182:. 136:, 132:, 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 217:( 124:) 118:) 80:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
STS-115
ɑʀк
ʏɑɴ
19:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Timeline of STS-115
Timeline of STS-115
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
STS-116
STS-117
STS-118
Timeline of STS-115
STS-115
STS-115 Timeline
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Space_missions
Talk:STS-115
Project talk page
Talk:STS-118
00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
James

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.