154:- ". To support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers about the term—not books and papers that use the term" - Article fails to establish any secondary sources, so its
257:. Should probably be merged somewhere, and google isn't very helpful with this one, but I don't think it should be deleted outright because of that. Give it a chance for references to be added or for it to find a new home in another article. —
200:. There are some in-passing Google Books returns, but it doesn't seem to really be a defined phrase, just one that has been (possibly independently) used descriptively. To that end, most of the article is
116:
222:
89:
84:
93:
17:
243:
76:
296:
36:
295:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
281:
261:
249:
232:
212:
188:
161:
141:
58:
80:
241:, because it concerns factual, familiar, famous phrases, but I agree that sources should be added. --
123:
All google hits are
Knowledge (XXG) mirrors. The article failed to explain (to me) what it even is!
55:
209:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
138:
278:
72:
64:
201:
170:
151:
124:
179:
155:
52:
174:
205:
184:
258:
110:
229:
270:
197:
158:
132:
49:
274:
289:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
106:
102:
98:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
299:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
221:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
223:list of Language-related deletions
24:
1:
245:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
316:
177:is also a concern here. --
282:15:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
262:08:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
250:15:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
233:15:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
213:07:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
189:06:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
162:04:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
142:04:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
59:01:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
292:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
269:merge with something (
277:?), as xezbeth xez.--
235:
226:
48:with redirect to
307:
294:
248:
246:
227:
217:
187:
182:
135:
129:
114:
96:
73:Tripartite motto
65:Tripartite motto
34:
315:
314:
310:
309:
308:
306:
305:
304:
303:
297:deletion review
290:
244:
242:
230:John Vandenberg
180:
178:
137:
133:
125:
87:
71:
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
313:
311:
302:
301:
285:
284:
264:
252:
236:
215:
191:
173:. The lack of
164:
131:
121:
120:
67:
62:
44:The result was
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
312:
300:
298:
293:
287:
286:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
263:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
240:
237:
234:
231:
224:
220:
216:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
190:
186:
183:
176:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
157:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
130:
128:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
291:
288:
266:
254:
238:
218:
193:
175:verifiablity
166:
147:
126:
122:
45:
43:
31:
28:
279:Victor falk
271:hendiatris
198:hendiatris
50:hendiatris
202:synthesis
206:Dhartung
194:Redirect
117:View log
259:Xezbeth
185:iva1979
90:protect
85:history
171:WP:NEO
167:Delete
152:WP:NEO
148:Delete
94:delete
46:Delete
275:motto
159:Corpx
156:WP:OR
127:Giggy
111:views
103:watch
99:links
56:garra
16:<
267:Keep
255:Keep
239:Keep
219:Note
210:Talk
204:. --
169:per
150:per
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
53:Gnan
228:--
225:.
196:to
115:– (
273:?
208:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
181:S
139:P
134:U
119:)
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.